The National Academies Press: Home The National Academies: Home
Read more than 3,700 books online FREE! More than 1900 PDFs now available for sale
HOME ABOUT NAP CONTACT NAP HELP NEW RELEASES ORDERING INFO Questions? Call 888-624-8373 cart icon Items in cart [0]
Browse by topic
View special offersEmail this pageSign up for email updates

PAPERBACK
list:$52.00
Web:$46.80
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Immigration Debate: Studies on the Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration (1998)
Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (CBASSE)

Page
374
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Immigration Debate: Studies on the Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration

Scalia, 1996:Table 2). About 45 percent of the legal immigrants to the United States are Hispanic in origin (Heer, 1996:Table 5.4). Of course this grouping is itself quite heterogeneous, including immigrants from Mexico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, and other countries in Central and South America and the Caribbean islands.

The heterogeneity of immigrant groups is an important source of complication in the relationship between immigration and crime. Not only is there social and cultural variation, for example, among Hispanic immigrants, there may be further significant variation in self-selection to participate in particular kinds of crime, as well as in legal documentation, with regard to vulnerability to statutory mandatory sentences and further group-linked variations in age and gender. Of course, such sources of variation also plague studies of other general correlates of crime, such as poverty and family breakdown, and crime itself is a heterogeneous entity. These problems do not stop research on these topics, but they do constitute reasons for caution in reaching policy-related conclusions. We attempt to address some of these concerns below.

Calculated on the basis of the Survey of State Prisons, the imprisonment rate for U.S. citizens is about 3.5 per 1,000 population. This rate is used as the base for calculating ratios presented in the first column of Table 9-1 for the most frequently imprisoned immigrant groups in U.S. state prisons. These figures indicate that immigrants from Cuba and the Dominican Republic are incarcerated at rates between four and five times those of citizens, that immigrants from Mexico, Jamaica and Colombia are incarcerated at rates from two to two and one-a half times those of citizens, and that immigrants from Guatemala and El Salva-

TABLE 9-1 Rates of Incarceration in U.S. State Prisons Per 1,000 Population

 

Number of Persons who entered U.S. between 1980 and 1990 (in thousands)

Inmates in State Prisons

State Imprisonment Rate

State Imprisonment Rate for Males 15–34***

National Origin

Mexico

2,145

14,711

6.858

47.61

Cuba

188

3,130

16.649

131.78

United Kingdom

154

313

2.032

19.34

Vietnam

336

313

1.073

6.81

El Salvador

350

1,252

3.577

26.48

Dominican Republic

185

2,817

15.227

126.98

Jamaica

155

1,252

8.077

69.52

Colombia

146

1,252

8.575

78.242

Guatemala

154

626

4.065

73.33

State Citizens

217,182*

751,200**

3.459

45.51

*U.S. Population less foreign-born noncitizens

**Inmates who are U.S. citizens

***Rate based on adjusting base for country-specific immigrant sex ratio and overall immigrant age distribution

Page
374
[ Top of Page ] [ Home ] [ Contact Us ] [ Help ] [ The National Academies Home ]