The National Academies Press: Home The National Academies: Home
Read more than 4,000 books online FREE! More than 1900 PDFs now available for sale
HOME ABOUT NAP CONTACT NAP HELP NEW RELEASES ORDERING INFO Questions? Call 888-624-8373 cart icon Items in cart [0]
Browse by topic
View special offersEmail this pageSign up for email updates

PAPERBACK
list:$26.00
Web:$23.40
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

National Spatial Data Infrastructure Partnership Programs: Rethinking the Focus (2001)
Board on Earth Sciences and Resources (BESR)

Page
43
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


National Spatial Data Infrastructure Partnership Programs: Rethinking the Focus

BOX 4 Soil Data in Minnesota-a Partnership Success Story

A 1994 survey of the Minnesota GIS community identified soil data at the top of the list of needs for new and improved data. The need was especially high for county governments and natural resource agencies. At the time, only one of Minnesota’s 87 counties had a spatially correct digital soil map and the rate of production for such products by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS-then called the Soil Conservation Service) was one county per year. Something needed to be done to provide the required geospatial soil data.

NRCS recognized a need to accelerate soil mapping nationwide and joined with USGS and other federal agencies to create a National Digital Orthophoto Program, with the expectation that the resulting orthophotos would provide a solid base for creating new soil maps. The Minnesota legislature provided matching funds, which accelerated completion of orthophotos across the state. As a consequence of the availability of these orthophotos, NRCS scientists focused new mapping activities on Minnesota.

The Minnesota Governor’s Council on Geographic Information created a soil committee, which studied the situation and determined that the biggest problem for many counties was spatial distortion in many of their soil maps, caused by lack of an orthoimagery base when the maps were compiled. Most Minnesota counties are in areas of low to moderate relief, and there was hope that these existing soil maps could be adjusted to the spatially correct orthophotos using elevation data collected as part of the National Digital Orthophoto Program.

The Minnesota Legislature, using special funds set aside for investing in natural resources, funded research by Professor Jay Bell at the University of Minnesota to see if such adjustments could be made without distorting other parts of the map. The project was successful and his approach is now being considered for approval by NRCS for use in other states. The approach has also helped focus fieldwork in counties updating obsolete soil maps.

As of late 2000, fourteen Minnesota counties have spatially-correct, modern digital soil maps and ten more are in progress. This progress would have been impossible without the contributions of the NRCS, USGS, the state policy council, the state legislature, individual counties, and the University of Minnesota.

Page
43
[ Top of Page ] [ Home ] [ Contact Us ] [ Help ] [ The National Academies Home ]