In November 2000, the Board on International Comparative Studies in Education (BICSE) held a symposium to draw on the wealth of experience gathered over a four--decade period, to evaluate improvement in the quality of the methodologies used in international studies, and to identify the most pressing methodological issues that remain to be solved. Since 1960, the United States has participated in 15 large--scale cross--national education surveys. The most assessed subjects have been science and mathematics through reading comprehension, geography, nonverbal reasoning, literature, French, English as a foreign language, civic education, history, computers in education, primary education, and second--language acquisition. The papers prepared for this symposium and discussions of those papers make up the volume, representing the most up--to--date and comprehensive assessment of methodological strengths and weaknesses of international comparative studies of student achievement. These papers answer the following questions: (1) What is the methodological quality of the most recent international surveys of student achievement? How authoritative are the results? (2) Has the methodological quality of international achievement studies improved over the past 40 years? and (3) What are promising opportunities for future improvement?
Table of Contents
|1. Progress and Challenges for Large-Scale Studies||1-24|
|2. The Measurement of Student Achievement in International Studies||25-57|
|3. Adapting Achievement Tests into Multiple Languages for International Assessments||58-79|
|4. Sampling Issues in Design, Conduct, and Interpretation of International Comparative Studies of School Achievement||80-114|
|5. Cultural-Cognitive Issues in Academic Achievement: New Directions for Cross-National Research||115-149|
|6. Measuring Family Background in International Studies of Education: Conceptual Issues and Methodological Challenges||150-197|
|7. Advancements in Conceptualizing and Analyzing Cultural Effects in Cross-National Studies of Educational Achievement||198-228|
|8. The Measurement of Opportunity to Learn||229-266|
|9. Statistical Issues in Analysis of International Comparisons of Educational Achievement||267-294|
|10. Drawing Inferences for National Policy from Large-Scale Cross-National Education Surveys||295-318|
|11. Large-Scale, Cross-National Surceys of Educational Achievement: Promises, Pitfalls, and Possibilities||319-350|
|Appendix A: Symposium Agenda and Participants||351-357|
|Appendix B: Biographical Sketches of Board Members||358-362|
The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Rightslink, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Rightslink allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Rightslink you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the National Academies Press (NAP) through Rightslink:
Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses. If you have questions or comments concerning the Rightslink service, please contact:
Rightslink Customer Care
Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543
To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at 800-624-6242 for pricing.
To request permission to translate a book published by the National Academies Press or its imprint, the Joseph Henry Press, please click here to view more information.