National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Read this book online, free! Click here to proceed to linked table of contents

Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs:

A Methodology Study

Book Cover

Status: Available Now

Size: 164 pages, 8 1/2 x 11

Publication Year:2003


E-mail this page
Print List Price    
Order online and save 10%
PAPERBACK
ISBN-10: 0-309-09058-X
ISBN-13: 978-0-309-09058-2
$35.00   Add to Cart
PDF     About PDF

Authors:
Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, Editors, Assisted by James A. Voytuk, Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, National Research Council
Authoring Organizations

Description:
How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an ...
Read More


Paste into your Web page:

Preview
Free Resources
Read

Full Text
Jump to this book's table of contents to begin reading online for free.

Research Tools
Download Free

PDF Summary
Download the summary in PDF.

Report In Brief
Download report in brief in PDF.

Rights & Permissions

Reprint Permission
Request permission to license or reprint the book's content through Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink.

Request Permission to Distribute a PDF

Request Translation Rights

Questions About Rights and Permissions?

Description

How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph.D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph.D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings.

Search This Book

»Find more like this book

SIGN UP FOR...

New Title Emails
Read about the newest releases and receive special offers.