Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Read this book online, free! Click here to proceed to linked table of contents

Review of Science Requirements for the Terrestrial Planet Finder:

Letter Report

Book Cover

Status: Not for Sale

Size: 12 pages, 8 1/2 x 11

Publication Year:2004

PDF      

Authors:
Panel to Review the Science Requirements for the Terrestrial Planet Finder, National Research Council
Authoring Organizations

Description:
The NRC, in its 2000 report, Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium, ranked the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TFP) project third among major NASA missions and sixth overall in its research priority recommendations to NASA for the coming decade. ...
Read More


Paste into your Web page:

Preview
Free Resources
Read

Full Text
Jump to this book's table of contents to begin reading online for free.

Research Tools

Web Search Builder
Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.

Reference Finder
Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Download Free

Sample PDF
Try before you buy. Download this sample PDF file to examine the quality of our PDF files and chapters.

Rights & Permissions

Reprint Permission
Request permission to license or reprint the book's content through Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink.

Request Permission to Distribute a PDF

Request Translation Rights

Questions About Rights and Permissions?

Table of Contents
Select a link below to start reading online free!
Letter Report 1-12 (skim)

Description

The NRC, in its 2000 report, Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium, ranked the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TFP) project third among major NASA missions and sixth overall in its research priority recommendations to NASA for the coming decade. In January 2004, NASA asked the NRC for an updated assessment of the TPF mission. In April 2004, NASA also announced its intention to proceed with both coronagrahic and interferometric planet finder missions (TPF-C and TPC-I) on an accelerated schedule. This letter report presents the findings of that updated assessment in light of NASA s announcement. In it, the NRC concludes that the mission's goals are consistent with the 2000 report, but raises two primary concerns. First, the current schedule for TPF-C does not leave enough time for vital precursor missions, and second, proceeding with the TPF-C now would disrupt the scientific balance of NASA s space science portfolio.

Search This Book

»Find more like this book

SIGN UP FOR...

New Title Emails
Read about the newest releases and receive special offers.