It is essential for patients and clinicians to have the resources needed to make informed, collaborative care decisions. Despite this need, only a small fraction of health-related expenditures in the United States have been devoted to comparative effectiveness research (CER). To improve the effectiveness and value of the care delivered, the nation needs to build its capacity for ongoing study and monitoring of the relative effectiveness of clinical interventions and care processes through expanded trials and studies, systematic reviews, innovative research strategies, and clinical registries, as well as improving its ability to apply what is learned from such study through the translation and provision of information and decision support.
As part of its Learning Health System series of workshops, the Institute of Medicine's (IOM's) Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care hosted a workshop to discuss capacity priorities to build the evidence base necessary for care that is more effective and delivers higher value for patients. Learning What Works summarizes the proceedings of the seventh workshop in the Learning Health System series. This workshop focused on the infrastructure needs--including methods, coordination capacities, data resources and linkages, and workforce--for developing an expanded and efficient national capacity for CER. Learning What Works also assesses the current and needed capacity to expand and improve this work, and identifies priority next steps.
Learning What Works is a valuable resource for health care professionals, as well as health care policy makers.
Table of Contents
|1 The Need and Potential Returns for Comparative Effectiveness Research||57-86|
|2 The Work Required||87-152|
|3 The Information Networks Required||153-190|
|4 The Talent Required||191-240|
|5 Implementation Priorities||241-314|
|6 Moving Forward||315-332|
|Appendix A: Learning What Works Best: The Nation's Need for Evidence on Comparative Effectiveness in Health Care||333-438|
|Appendix B: Comparative Effectiveness Studies Inventory Project||439-468|
|Appendix C: Comparative Effectiveness Research Priorities: IOM Recommendations (2009)||469-510|
|Appendix D: Comparative Effectiveness Research Priorities: FCCCER Recommendations (2009)||511-518|
|Appendix E: Affordable Care Act (ACA) (2010) Provisions for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)||519-540|
|Appendix F: Workshop Agenda||541-548|
|Appendix G: Biographical Sketches of Workshop Participants||549-568|
|Appendix H: Workshop Attendee List||569-579|
|Other Publications in The Learning Health System Series||580-580|
The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Rightslink, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Rightslink allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Rightslink you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the National Academies Press (NAP) through Rightslink:
Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses. If you have questions or comments concerning the Rightslink service, please contact:
Rightslink Customer Care
Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543
To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at 800-624-6242 for pricing.
To request permission to translate a book published by the National Academies Press or its imprint, the Joseph Henry Press, please click here to view more information.