Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$72.50
Web:$65.25
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $37.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines (1991)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Page
7
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Page 7

TABLE 1-2 Summary of Conclusions by Adverse Event for DPTa and RA 27/3 MMRb Vaccines

 

Adverse Events Reviewed

 

Conclusion

DPT Vaccine

RA 27/3 Rubella Vaccine

1. No evidence bearing on a causal relationc

Autism

 

2. Evidence insufficient to indicate a causal relationd 

Aseptic meningitis
Chronic neurologic damage
Erythema multiforme  or other rash
Guillain-Barré syndrome
Hemolytic anemia
Juvenile diabetes Learning disabilities and attention-deficit disorder
Peripheral mononeuropathy
Thrombocytopenia

Radiculoneuritis and other neuropathies
Thrombocytopenic purpura

3. Evidence does not indicate a causal relatione

Infantile spasms
Hypsarrythmia
Reye syndrome
Sudden infant death syndrome

 

4. Evidence is consistent with a causal relationf 

Acute encephalopathyg
Shock and "unusual shock-like state"

Chronic arthritis

5. Evidence indicates a causal relationh 

Anaphylaxis
Protracted, inconsolable crying

Acute arthritis

a Evidence does not differentiate between DPT vaccine and the pertussis component of DPT vaccine except in the case of protracted, inconsolable crying where the evidence implicates the pertussis component specifically.

b RA 27/3 MMR, Trivalent measles-mumps-rubella vaccine containing the RA 27/3 rubella strain.

c No category of evidence was found bearing on a judgment about causation (all categories of evidence left blank in Table 1-1).

d Relevant evidence in one or more categories was identified but was judged to be insufficient to indicate whether or not a causal relation exists (no category of evidence checked as supporting causation in Table 1-1; exceptions are this designation under biologic plausibility for erythema multiforme and hemolytic anemia).

e The available evidence, on balance, does not indicate a causal relation (one or more categories of evidence checked as not supporting causation in Table 1-1, with evidence supporting causation being either absent or outweighed by the other evidence).

f The available evidence, on balance, tends to support a causal relation (one or more categories of evidence checked as supporting causation in Table 1-1, with evidence checked as insufficient or not supporting causation being absent or outweighed by the other evidence).

g Defined in controlled studies reviewed as encephalopathy, encephalitis, or encephalomyelitis.

h The available evidence, on balance, supports a causal relation, and the evidence is more persuasive than that for conclusion 4 above (the categories of evidence are coded similarly to those in conclusion 4, with evidence checked as insufficient or not supporting causation in Table 1-1 being absent or less than for 4).

Page
7
[ Top of Page ] [ Home ] [ Contact Us ] [ Help ] [ The National Academies Home ]