The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 151
the importance of uncertainties created by our limited
understanding of oceanic behavior and other phenomena.
Although the full warming due to emissions from 1990 to 2030
will not occur until a few decades thereafter, there will also be
warming during the period from emissions prior to 1990. In
addition, the continuing emissions beyond 2030 will lead to further
warming over the longer term.
Implications
The results of this analysis offer several points for
consideration in attempting to optimize a greenhouse gas limitation
policy.
1. The slope of the N2O
curve in Figure 17.3 is so flat that even large changes in
emissions would have a relatively minor effect over this period.
This assumes, however, that the ozone interactions with N2O are small. In any case, continued
emissions of N2O, over the long
term, will not lead to a significant increase in warming despite
its long lifetime.
2. Once CFC emissions are reduced by 50 percent, little
more is gained (with respect to their greenhouse warming effect) by
further reduction in the period to 2030, although a CFC buildup
would continue to occur at this level of emissions. (In addition,
the effects of CFCs on ozone need to be considered.) Clearly,
however, a failure to implement the Montreal Protocol would have a
substantial warming effect (as pointed out by Hansen et al., 1989).
Unless emissions of the uncontrolled CFCs increase substantially
(and they might), their greenhouse warming effect will be
relatively modest over this period, although continued emissions
would allow an additional concentration buildup and the associated
forcing. The uncontrolled CFCs do not generally have long
lifetimes.
3. Strong controls on CH4
emissions, though perhaps difficult to implement, would produce a
large effect. (Note that the potential for additional CH4 emissions from CH4 hydrates now tied up in permafrost has
not been included.)
4. Carbon dioxide is clearly the major factor and has the
steepest slope and the potential to lead to the largest temperature
changes. Note, however, that 25 to 50 percent reductions in CO2 emissions over the period 1990 to 2030
will still lead to rather substantial increases in the radiative
flux (and ultimately in temperature change).
Summing the radiative flux changes assuming no change in
emissions (already a rather stringent measure) produces a flux
increase of about 1.6 W/m2. This,
when added to the 2.45 W/m2
already experienced since 1765 (or the 1.95 W/m2 since about 1900), indicates that the
climate will have been committed to the radiative equivalent of a
CO2 doubling (4.4 W/m2) by about 2030 or a little later. Any
increases in emission rates will only