The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Ground Water & Soil Cleanup: Improving Management of Persistent Contaminants
REFERENCES
Aines, R. 1997. Results from Visalia: Rapid thermal cleanup of dense nonaqueous-phase liquids. Presentation to the National Research Council Committee on Technologies for Cleanup of Subsurface Contaminants in the DOE Weapons Complex, Third Meeting, Livermore, Calif., December 15–17.
Ballard, J. H., and M. J. Cullinane, Jr. 1997. Tri-Service Site Characterization and Analysis Penetrometer System (SCAPS) Technology Verification and Transition. Vicksburg, Miss.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Baum, J. S. 1998a. SCFA processes for setting project funding priorities. Presentation to the National Research Council Committee on Technologies for Cleanup of Subsurface Contaminants in the DOE Weapons Complex, Fifth Meeting, Augusta, Ga. February 18–20.
Baum, J. S. 1998b. Written memorandum in answer to questions submitted by the Committee on Technologies for Cleanup of Subsurface Contaminants in the DOE Weapons Complex. Aitken, S.C.: DOE, Savannah River Site.
Brown, R. A., W. Mahaffey, and R. D. Norris. 1993. In situ bioremediation: The state of the practice. Pp. 121–135 in In Situ Bioremediation: When Does It Work? Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Civil Engineering. 1998. Chemical barrier remediates groundwater. Civil Engineering (November):14.
Cooper, R. K. 1993. Winning at New Products. New York: Perseus Press.
Crocker, T. 1997. Buried waste containment system: Results of recent research. Presentation to the National Research Council Committee on Technologies for Cleanup of Subsurface Contaminants in the DOE Weapons Complex, Second Meeting, Woods Hole, Mass., September 22–23.
Cummings, M., and S. R. Booth. 1996. Cost Effectiveness of In Situ Redox Manipulation for Remediation of Chromium-Contaminated Groundwater. Los Alamos, N.M.: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
DOE (Department of Energy). 1996. Innovative Technology Summary Report: Lasagna® Soil Remediation. DOE/EM-0308. Washington, D.C.: DOE.
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1996. Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Eighth Edition). EPA-542-R-96-010. Washington, D.C.: EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
EPA. 1997. Superfund Public Information System. Washington, D.C.: EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. http://www.epa.gov/Superfund.
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. 1995. Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies. EPA-542-R-95-001. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. 1997. Abstracts of Remediation Case Studies. EPA-542-R-97-010. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
Fruchter, J. S. 1997. In situ redox manipulation: Results of recent research. Presentation to the National Research Council Committee on Technologies for Cleanup of Subsurface Contaminants in the DOE Weapons Complex, Second Meeting, Woods Hole, Mass., September 22–23.
GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). 1992. Cleanup Technology: Better Management for DOE's Technology Development Program. GAO/RCED-92-145. Washington, D.C.: GAO.
GAO. 1994a. Department of Energy: Management Changes Needed to Expand Use of Innovative Cleanup Technologies. GAO/RCED-94-205. Washington, D.C.: GAO.
GAO. 1994b. Nuclear Cleanup: Difficulties in Coordinating Activities Under Two Environmental Laws. GAO/RCED-95-66. Washington, D.C.: GAO.