| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System
A Program Review
Philip S.Brachman, Heather C.O’Maonaigh, and Richard N.Miller, Editors
Committee to Review the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System
Medical Follow-Up Agency
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C.
OCR for page R2
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20418
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
Support for this project was provided by Contract No. DAM17-00-P-0412. The views presented in this report are those of the Institute of Medicine Committee to Review the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Response System and are not necessarily those of the funding agencies.
International Standard Book Number 0-309-07635-8
Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the
National Academy Press,
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Box 285, Washington, DC 20055. Call (800) 624–6242 or (202) 334–3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area), or visit the NAP’s home page at www.nap.edu. The full text of this report is available at www.nap.edu.
For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page at: www.iom.edu.
Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history. The serpent adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is a relief carving from ancient Greece, now held by the Staatliche Museen in Berlin.
OCR for page R3
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
“Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.”
—Goethe
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
Shaping the Future for Health
OCR for page R4
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M.Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm.A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I.Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M.Alberts and Dr. Wm.A.Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.
OCR for page R5
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GLOBAL EMERGING INFECTIONS SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE SYSTEM
PHILIP S.BRACHMAN (Chair), Professor,
Department of International Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
RUTH L.BERKELMAN, Professor,
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
DONALD S.BURKE, Professor,
Department of International Health and
Director of the Center for Immunization Research,
Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
KATHLEEN F.GENSHEIMER, State Epidemiologist,
Bureau of Health, Maine Department of Human Services, Augusta, Maine
C.JAMES HOSPEDALES, Director,
Caribbean Epidemiology Center, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, Port of Spain, Trinidad, West Indies
ANN MARIE KIMBALL, Professor,
Health Services and Epidemiology, Adjunct in Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
GUÉNAËL R.RODIER, Director,
Department of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
RONALD K.ST. JOHN, Executive Director,
Center for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Project Staff
RICHARD N.MILLER, Study Director
HEATHER C.O’MAONAIGH, Program Officer
PAMELA RAMEY-McCRAY, Administrative Assistant
ANDREA COHEN, Financial Associate
OCR for page R6
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page R7
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
Preface
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has historically defined its interest in infectious diseases almost exclusively in terms of “battle-stopper” illnesses—those resulting in acute effects that can directly affect military operations. Although this approach remains central to the U.S. military’s infectious disease doctrine, development of the DoD Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (GEIS) is part of an important transition in the way that the threat of infectious diseases— and, more specifically, the threat of emerging infectious diseases—is perceived and addressed by the U.S. military.
Emerging infectious disease surveillance is sustained globally through a network of activities maintained through the collective efforts of numerous governmental and nongovernmental agencies. It is through the contributions of many partners that surveillance for emerging infectious diseases is possible. The DoD possesses valuable resources that can be brought to bear in this effort. It maintains an extensive, diverse array of laboratory facilities, both within the United States and overseas. These DoD laboratories can perform routine diagnostic testing, but they also possess rare, sometimes unique, diagnostic capabilities. DoD overseas laboratories are located throughout the world in areas where the potential for the emergence of infectious diseases is high. Often, laboratories operate in regions where alternative laboratory resources are sparse or nonexistent (e.g., sub-Saharan Africa). No other organization or government in the world maintains such extensive or capable laboratory facilities and staffing internationally. DoD laboratory facilities represent medical re-
OCR for page R8
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
search, public health, and diplomatic resources that serve U.S. military, U.S. civilian, and global interests alike.
For more than a decade, formal DoD participation in emerging infectious disease surveillance has been encouraged by many in the U.S. public health community and within the DoD. In 1996, Presidential Decision Directive NSTC-7 (NSTC is the National Science and Technology Council of the Executive Office of the President) transformed these recommendations into a mandate. Thereafter, the National Intelligence Council declared emerging infectious diseases to be a threat to the national security of the United States, underscoring the importance of DoD participation in disease surveillance efforts. This role is not an altogether new one, as the DoD has been conducting various infectious disease surveillance projects (e.g., for influenza) for many years. Accommodation of its expanded role has led the DoD to implement GEIS. The committee recognizes this effort as a responsive and effective step toward addressing the problem of emerging infectious diseases.
We would like to thank the staff of the DoD laboratories, both domestic and overseas, and the staff of the GEIS Central Hub for the time and effort that they have invested in sharing with us information about the GEIS operations that they support. This review effort was very much a collegial one, and the report benefited from the openness of all those who provided us with documentation, presentations, and conversations. This study was also enriched by the insights that GEIS collaborators and associates provided regarding their views of GEIS from the outside looking in. Lists of the laboratory staff and GEIS collaborators and associates who shared their time with the committee can be found at the ends of Chapters 2 through 7 of this report. Any omissions are strictly the result of oversight.
The support provided by Institute of Medicine staff was instrumental in keeping this study moving apace. We extend our thanks to Richard Miller, Heather O’Maonaigh, and Pamela Ramey-McCray of the Institute of Medicine’s Medical Follow-Up Agency and to National Academies Travel staff, particularly Ann-Marie Walko, for their assistance. This study also benefited from the attention of Andrea Cohen, financial associate; Michael Hayes, consulting editor; and Linda Kilroy, contracting officer. Medical Follow-Up Agency staff members Phillip Bailey, Salem Fisseha, Lois Joellenbeck, and Karen Kazmerzak also helped along the way.
In addition, we are grateful to GEIS Central Hub staff members, particularly Joel Gaydos, Steve Gubenia, Patrick Kelley, Jennifer Rubenstein, and James Writer for their tireless assistance in preparing and compiling background documents and for helping to plan and negotiate the logistics of site visits. Likewise, we offer special thanks to Roxana Lescano, Lucy Rubio, and Trueman Sharp, Naval Medical Research Center Detachment,
OCR for page R9
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
Peru; Andrew Corwin and John Sisson, Naval Medical Research Unit 2, Indonesia; Gaye Ruble, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Thailand; Cole Church, Naval Medical Research Unit 3, Egypt; Ronald Rosenberg, U.S. Army Medical Research Unit, Kenya; and Leslie Henry, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, for their help in putting site visits together.
This report is a testament to the hard work, patience, and resolve of many. We extend to all involved our appreciation and gratitude.
Philip S.Brachman (Committee Chair)
Ruth L.Berkelman
Donald S.Burke
Kathleen F.Gensheimer
C.James Hospedales
Ann Marie Kimball
Guénaël R.Rodier
Ronald K.St. John
OCR for page R10
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page R11
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
Reviewers
This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
JAMES BANTA, Adjunct Professor, International Public Health, International Health Policy, The George Washington University Medical Center
KENNETH BART, Director, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University
DAVID BRANDLING-BENNETT, Deputy Director, Pan American Health Organization
SCOTT HALSTEAD, Adjunct Professor, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
ROBERT HOLZMAN, Professor of Clinical & Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine
JOSHUA LEDERBERG, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Foundation Scholar, The Rockefeller University
OCR for page R14
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
Collaborations,
39
Recommendations,
42
People Met and Interviewed,
44
Itinerary,
45
3
GEIS AT NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH UNIT 2, INDONESIA
47
Laboratory,
48
Staffing,
50
Technology and Information Management,
51
Surveillance,
52
Response Capacity,
56
Collaborations,
57
Recommendations,
58
People Met and Interviewed,
61
Itinerary,
62
4
GEIS AT THE ARMED FORCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (AFRIMS), THAILAND
65
Laboratory,
66
Staffing,
67
Technology and Information Management,
69
Surveillance,
69
Response Capacity,
74
Collaborations,
74
Recommendations,
77
People Met and Interviewed,
79
Itinerary,
80
5
GEIS AT NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH UNIT 3, EGYPT
83
Laboratory,
84
Staffing,
84
Technology and Information Management,
86
Surveillance,
87
Response Capacity,
90
Collaborations,
91
Recommendations,
93
People Met and Interviewed,
96
Itinerary,
96
6
GEIS AT U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH UNIT, KENYA
99
Laboratory,
100
Staffing,
102
Technology and Information Management,
104
OCR for page R15
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
Surveillance,
105
Response Capacity,
109
Collaborations,
111
Recommendations,
115
People Met and Interviewed,
119
Itinerary,
119
7
GEIS CENTRAL HUB AND MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM ACTIVITIES
121
Description of GEIS Central Hub and MHS Activities,
122
Conclusions,
146
Recommendations,
150
Agendas,
153
GEIS Central Hub and Military Health System Activities Review: Meeting Participants, Guests, and Other Contributors,
155
8
SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
159
Summary Conclusions,
159
Summary Recommendations,
170
REFERENCES
177
APPENDIX: COMMITTEE MEMBER AND STAFF BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARIES
187
OCR for page R16
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page R17
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADP
automated data processor
AFEB
Armed Forces Epidemiology Board
AFI
acute febrile illness
AFIERA
Air Force Institute for Environmental Safety and Occupational Health Risk Analysis
AFIP
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
AFRIMS
Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences
AMREF
African Medical and Research Foundation
AFRESS
Air Force Reportable Events Surveillance System
AIDS
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
BSL
biosafety level
CAREC
Caribbean Epidemiology Center
CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (United States)
CHCS/CHCS II
Department of Defense Composite Health Care System (I and II)
CHPPM
Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine
CINC
Commander-in-Chief, Unified Combatant Command
OCR for page R18
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
CISET
Committee on International Science, Engineering, and Technology
CRDA
Cooperative Research and Development Agreement
DoD
Department of Defense (United States)
DMS
Department of Medical Services
DMSS
Defense Medical Surveillance System
EID
emerging infectious disease
ELISA
enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
EMRO
Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, World Health Organization
ENSO
El Niño/Southern Oscillation
EWORS
Early Warning Outbreak Response System
ESSENCE
Electronic Surveillance System for Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics
FSN
foreign service national
FETP
Field Epidemiology Training Program
FLUNET
WHO’s influenza surveillance system
GEIS
Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System
GIS
geographic information system
GISP
Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
ILRI
International Livestock Research Institute
IOM
Institute of Medicine
IT
information technology
IS
information systems
INS
Instituto Nacional de Salud (Peru)
JICA
Japanese International Cooperative Agency
KEMRI
Kenya Medical Research Institute
LITS
Laboratory Information Tracking System
MDR-TB
multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis
MEDCOM
Medical Command
MFO
U.S. Multinational Forces and Observers
OCR for page R19
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
MHS
Military Health System
MIDRP
Military Infectious Disease Research Program
MoH
Ministry of Health
MOHP
Ministry of Health and Population (Egypt)
MSF
Médicins Sans Frontières; Doctors without Borders
NAMRID
Naval Medical Research Institute Detachment
NAMRU-2
Naval Medical Research Unit 2
NAMRU-3
Naval Medical Research Unit 3
NASA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NDRS
Naval Disease Reporting System
NEHC
Naval Environmental Health Center
NEPMU
Navy Environmental and Preventive Medicine Unit
NHRC
Naval Health Research Center
NIAID
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
NMRCD
Naval Medical Research Center Detachment
NGO
nongovernmental organization
NIH
National Institutes of Health
NSTC-7
National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President, Presidential Decision Directive NSTC-7
NSDD
National Security Decision Directive
OGE
Oficina General de Epidemiologia (Ministry of Health Office of Epidemiology, Peru)
OSTP
Office of Science and Technology Policy
PACOM
Pacific Command
PAHO
Pan American Health Organization
PHLIS
Public Health Laboratory Information System
RSD
Research Sciences Department
SEATO
Southeast Asia Treaty Organization
SOUTHCOM
Southern Command
STD
sexually transmitted disease
TAML
Theater Area Medical Laboratory
TB
tuberculosis
TEPHINET
Training in Epidemiology and Public Health Intervention Network
TMA
Tricare Management Area
OCR for page R20
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
USAID
United States Agency for International Development
USAID-VIGIA
United States Agency for International Development-project Addressing Threats of Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases
USAMRIID
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
USAMRU-K
United States Army Medical Research Unit, Kenya
U.S. CDC
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
USUHS
United States Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
VEE
Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis
VIGIA
Addressing Threats of Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases project
VPHL
Virtual Public Health Laboratory
VOIP
Voice Over Internet Protocol
VSAT
very small apperature terminal
WHO
World Health Organization
WRAIR
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
OCR for page R21
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
GEIS Maps
Source: J.Writer, Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System.
OCR for page R22
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
OCR for page R23
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
OCR for page R24
Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review
This page in the original is blank.