Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$36.50
Web:$32.85
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2002 NAE Symposium on Frontiers of Engineering (2003)
National Academy of Engineering (NAE)

Page
11
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Eighth Annual Symposium on Frontiers of Engineering

Dimension-Dependent Properties of Macromolecules in Nanoscopic Structures

JUAN J. DE PABLO AND PAUL F. NEALEY

Department of Chemical Engineering

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Many materials exhibit size-dependent properties as system dimensions approach the atomic or molecular level. For example, metal and semiconducting nanoclusters with dimensions of a few nanometers exhibit remarkable optical, electrical, mechanical, catalytic, and magnetic properties (Murray et al., 2000). Nanocluster properties differ significantly from corresponding bulk properties; they depend on the quantum-level electronic structure of the ensemble and the ratio of surface to bulk atoms, and they provide the foundation for a wide range of innovative nanotechnologies. Unfortunately, much less is known about the properties of amorphous, polymeric materials in nanoscopic structures. Because the characteristic dimensions typically associated with polymeric molecules are on the order of 5- to 10-nm, it is natural to expect size-dependent properties in polymeric structures with dimensions from 10 to 100 nm.

Evidence for dimension-dependent properties of amorphous polymers has been observed in measurements of the glass transition temperature, Tg. Experiments by several research groups, including ours, report that the Tg of polymer films with nanoscopic dimensions can be significantly different from the corresponding bulk value (Forrest and Dalnoki-Veress, 2001). Based on seminal experiments by Forrest et al. (1996), it is now widely perceived that the Tg of freestanding, ultrathin films is substantially lower than that of the bulk material. Our recent simulations suggest that polymer chains or chain segments near the free surfaces of the films have greater mobility than the polymer in the interior of the film (Torres et al., 2000). We postulate that as the film thickness decreases, the fraction of the film with higher mobility increases, thereby resulting in the observed monotonic decrease with film thickness (Jain and de Pablo, 2000). In contrast, Tg for supported, ultrathin films has been observed to increase or de

Page
11