Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $47.00
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$40.00
Web:$36.00
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $31.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $3.90
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Improving Undergraduate Instruction in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Report of a Workshop (2003)
Center for Education (CFE)

Page
89
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Using the RTOP to Evaluate Reformed Science and Mathematics Instruction1

Anton E. Lawson

Department of Biology, Arizona State University

INTRODUCTION

The Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers (ACEPT) Program is a National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored program aimed at improving undergraduate science and mathematics instruction at Arizona State University (ASU) and in the surrounding community colleges. The primary reform mechanism has been summer workshops in which college faculty experience reformed teaching methods and then attempt to implement those methods in their courses. The reformed methods are based on the principles of effective teaching introduced by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science for All Americans (1989). In turn, the AAAS teaching principles (see Box A-1) are based on learning theory derived from years of cognitive research. That theory posits that learning results from active, learner-centered inquiry in which students construct new concepts and conceptual systems by connecting new information and concepts to what they already believe. Further, effective learning often requires restructuring, or even discarding, previous concepts and beliefs when they prove incompatible with, or contradictory to, new evidence and new concepts (e.g., Alexander and Murphy, 1999).

The ACEPT program has attempted to incorporate reformed teaching methods into several courses for nonmajors and majors. These include

1  

Based in part on Lawson et al. (2002).

Page
89