About Ordering New Releases Special Offers Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press The National Academies

PAPERBACK
price:$35.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Marine Mammal Populations and Ocean Noise: Determining When Noise Causes Biologically Significant Effects (2005)
Ocean Studies Board (OSB)

Citation Manager

National Research Council. "3 How to Get From Acoustic Disturbance to Population Effects." Marine Mammal Populations and Ocean Noise: Determining When Noise Causes Biologically Significant Effects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005. 1. Print.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
65
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Marine Mammal Populations and Ocean Noise: Determining When Noise Causes Biologically Significant Effects

strategies akin to the PBR model (see Chapter 4). Essential components of such a model would be estimates of the reliability of every categorization in the model and explanations of how each categorization was reached. The models would provide a structure for further refinement and, like the proposed IBM and demographic modeling exercises, help to identify gaps in knowledge. The key point to make is that modeling exercises like this can lead to robust management approaches, as the PBR model demonstrates, even when knowledge is incomplete.

Expert Opinion

Data on many links in the chain from acoustic stimuli to population effects on marine mammal populations are sparse or lacking. Therefore, regulators such as NOAA Fisheries and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) may often find it necessary to rely on expert opinion regarding the probable effects of specific activities until more data accumulate. Although the use of expert opinion does not necessarily produce an accurate result (experts can be wrong, especially when data are lacking), it does provide a structured, well-documented basis for decision-making that often with-stands legal scrutiny. Precedents for the use of expert opinion to evaluate risk in a conservation context are provided by the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service’s extensive reliance on expert opinion for population-viability assessments under the National Forest Management Act (Andelman et al., 2001) and FWS’s increasing use of expert opinion for making listing decisions under the Endangered Species Act (ESA; J. Cochrane, US Fish and Wildlife Service, personal communication, 2004). Because eliciting and using expert opinion are complex tasks beset with pitfalls for the inexperienced, any use of expert opinion should follow established procedures detailed in the substantial scientific literature on the subject (Morgan and Henrion, 1990; Goodwin and Wright, 1991; Meyer and Booker, 1991; Anderson, 1998; Andelman et al., 2001) to avoid bias and increase credibility.

Risk Assessment

Evaluating the effects of noise on marine mammal populations is a problem in risk assessment. Previous National Research Council reports have considered the general process of risk assessment by the federal government (NRC, 1983) and risk assessment in relation to contaminants and

Page
65
?>