Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

LoginRegister

| Items in cart [0]

PAPERBACK
price:$44.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

Free Resources

Related Titles

Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations (2002)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format
Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.
Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book.
Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Citation Manager

. "4 The Mammography Exemplar." Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Please select a format:

Page
144


E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Populations

TABLE 4-1 Estimated Intervention Effects

		Combined Estimate Difference
Intervention Type	Number of Studies	Unadjusted (95-percent confidence interval^a)	Adjusted for Months^b	Combined Estimate Odds Ratio (95-percent confidence interval^a)
Access enhancing^c	14	18.9 (10.4, 27.4)	16.5	2.3 (1.7, 3.1)
Individual directed associated with a health care setting	15	17.6 (11.6, 24.0)	14.1	2.5 (1.9, 3.4)
Individual directed associated with a community setting	13	6.8 (1.8, 11.8)	7.0	1.3 (1.0, 1.6)
Community education^a	14	9.7 (3.9, 15.6)	10.4	1.5 (1.2, 1.9)
Media Campaigns^a	6	5.9 (0.3, 11.5)	11.4 (1.0, 1.8)	1.3
Social Network^a	7	5.8 (-0.2, 11.9)	13.0	1.4 (1.0, 2.0)
Estimated combined effect sizes with confidence limits for each intervention type. Random effects models. Studies may be classified as implementing more than one type of intervention. Entire group comparisons for primary outcomes. ^aConfidence intervals only approximate because cluster randomization is not taken into account. ^bModel includes outcome months. ^cControl groups do not include strategies of the same intervention type.