National Academies Press: OpenBook

Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs (2001)

Chapter: PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE PROTECTION OF HUMANS STUDIED IN RESEARCH

« Previous: INTRODUCTION
Suggested Citation:"PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE PROTECTION OF HUMANS STUDIED IN RESEARCH." Institute of Medicine. 2001. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10085.
×
Page 116

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

APPENDIX B 116 standards will serve as a guidepost to aid organizations and other entities in building and/or strengthening their programs for the protection of protections for individuals studied in research. The on-site review portion of the accreditation program is the second phase, and, as mentioned above, be voluntary, educational, and constructive. Standards are prerequisite to the successful operation of an accreditation system, as they provide a means by which expectations can be stated, and by which performance in accordance with those expectations can be measured. When evaluating the applicability of these standards to a given research program, the responsible institutional individual(s) should take into account the types of research with which that human research protection program is involved. For example, in light of the continuing increase of multicenter and cooperative studies, organizations participating in such trials must first assess the manner in which the various components of their Human Research Protection Program interact in order to provide appropriate protective mechanisms. GOALS The goal of voluntary accreditation is to improve the systems that protect the rights and safeguard the welfare of individuals who participate in research. Secondary goals may include: • To communicate to the scientific community and to the public a strong declaration of a research organization's commitment to the protection of human research participants; • To help organizations understand the need to commit adequate resources to maintain quality human research protection programs; • To enhance an organization's ability to attract students to graduate research training programs; and • To promote a higher quality of research, which will in turn result in better scientific outcomes and, ultimately, better healthcare. PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE PROTECTION OF HUMANS STUDIED IN RESEARCH In the United States the conduct of research involving humans is a conditional privilege requiring that research is conducted in keeping with well-established ethical principles, applicable federal, state, and local laws, and/or relevant policies and procedures. The Belmont Report—Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (1979) provides the philosophical basis for current laws governing human subjects research. This Report identifies three fundamental ethical principles that are relevant to all research involving human

Next: GLOSSARY »
Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs Get This Book
×
 Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs
Buy Paperback | $60.00 Buy Ebook | $47.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Amid increasing concern for patient safety and the shutdown of prominent research operations, the need to improve protections for individuals who volunteer to participate in research has become critical. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs considers the possible impact of creating an accreditation system to raise the performance of local protection mechanisms. In the United States, the system for human research participant protections has centered on the Institutional Review Board (IRB); however, this report envisions a broader system with multiple functional elements.

In this context, two draft sets of accreditation standards are reviewed (authored by Public Responsibility in Medicine & Research and the National Committee for Quality Assurance) for their specific content in core areas, as well as their objectivity and validity as measurement tools. The recommendations in the report support the concept of accreditation as a quality improvement strategy, suggesting that the model should be initially pursued through pilot testing of the proposed accreditation programs.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!