National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$44.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs (2001)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "Executive Summary." Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
22
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs

BOX 1 Summary of Committee's Recommendations According to the Three Implementation Phases of an Accreditation Process

Development of an Accreditation Program:

Pursue Accreditation Through Pilot Testing as One Approach

(Recommendation 1)

Establish (a) Nongovernmental Accreditation Organization(s)

(Recommendation 2)

Accommodate Distinct Research Methods and Models Within Accreditation Programs

(Recommendation 5)

Directly Involve Research Participants in Accreditation Programs & HRPPPs

(Recommendation 8)

Development of Standards:

Articulate Sound Goals Within Accreditation Standards

(Recommendation 3)

Establish Flexible, Ethics-Based, and Meaningful Standards

(Recommendation 4)

Base Standards on Existing Regulations

(Recommendation 6)

Incorporate Continuous Quality Improvement Mechanisms into Standards

(Recommendation 7)

Use Modified NCQA Standards to Initiate Pilot Programs

(Recommendation 9)

Development of an Evaluation Process:

Begin Collecting Data and Assessing Impacts of Accreditation Now

(Recommendation 10)

Initiate Federal Studies Evaluating Accreditation

(Recommendation 11)

Page
22