National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×

APPENDIX B

LETTERS OF REQUEST FOR THIS STUDY

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×

Department of Energy

Washington, DC 20585

April 13, 2000

Dr. Kevin D. Crowley

Direct

Board on Radioactive Waste Management


National Research Council

2001 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20007


Dear Dr. Crowley:

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and your Committee Members for your extraordinary effort providing the Department with an independent technical review of alternatives for processing the high-level radioactive waste salt solutions at the Savannah River Site. We agree with your interim comments noting that additional research and development is required for each option, and we are proceeding with addressing your comments in our research and development plans for fiscal years 2000 and 2001. I am looking forward to receiving your final report this month so that we can make adjustments in the current plans if needed.

I believe that the complexity of the salt processing technology alternatives warrants your continued involvement in our continuing research and development efforts. Therefore, I would like to request that you and your Committee continue to support the Department throughout the next year by providing us with your independent review of each technology road map, and the selection criteria.

Dr. Huntoon has tasked me, as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Project Completion, to provide the leadership and program management for technology development and selection of a preffered treatment alternative. I am working closely with the Office of Science and Technology, as well as the DOE-Savannah River Operations Office, to make sure that this effort is adequately supported. An Action Plan has been prepared, and is enclosed, which provides details of the roles and responsibilities for the project. I will be providing the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management with quarterly progress reviews on each of the technology activities throughout the ensuing months, and I propose that we follow those reviews with a briefing to your Committee to keep you abreast of the salt processing project's progress. Of course, additional briefings, meetings, and documentation will be made available to the Committee as you deem necessary to support your review.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×

Based on the current schedule, we would be seeking your Committee 's review of the items identified above in early summer 2000. Due to the short time available between now and the anticipated time we require your support, may I suggest that you utilize your existing Committee to expedite matters.

Mr. Ken Lang of my staff will be contacting you directly to coordinate the details. Mr. Lang can be reached at (301) 903-7453.

Thank you in advance for your continued support of DOE. I look forward to working with you in this endeavor.

Sincerely,

Mark W. Frei

Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Project Completion


Office of Project Completion

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×

Department of Energy

Washington, DC 20585

June 15, 2000

Dr. Kevin D. Crowley

Director

Board on Radioactive Waste Management

National Research Council

2001 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20007


Dear Dr. Crowley:

Thank you for your May 16, 2000, letter responding to my request that the National Research Council continue its support of the Department 's high-level waste salt processing alternatives at the Savannah River Site.

I am pleased that you would like to continue to provide technical assistance to the Department throughout the planned research and development phase of this project, pending approval of the Board on Radioactive Waste Management and the National Research Council Governing Board.

Your proposals to (1) comment on the criteria that will be used to select a processing alternative; (2) evaluate the results of the research and development work that is undertaken on the candidate processing alternatives; and (3) provide the Department with an assessment of whether the technical uncertainties have been sufficiently resolved to proceed with downsizing the list of alternatives will meet our needs throughout the remaining research and development period. I found the interim report you provided on your current evaluation to be particularly useful in planning the research and development now underway, and I am confident that an interim report for this phase of the study will be valuable in the selection of alternative processing technologies.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×

Mr. Kenneth Lang of my staff is available to support you and the committee for this review. Mr. Lang can be reached at (301) 903-7453.

Thank you for your continued support of DOE.

Sincerely,

Mark W. Frei

Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Project Completion

Office of Environmental Management

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×
Page 13
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×
Page 14
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×
Page 15
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×
Page 16
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letters of Request for this Study." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10088.
×
Page 17
Next: Appendix C: High-Level Waste Tanks at the Savannah River Site »
Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report Get This Book
×
 Evaluation of Criteria for Selecting a Salt Processing Alternative for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site: Interim Report
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!