Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$32.00
Web:$28.80
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $24.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Disposition of High-Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges (2001)
Board on Radioactive Waste Management (BRWM)

Page
4
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Page 4

  • Successful decision making is open, transparent, and broadly participatory. National waste disposition programs in democratic countries cannot hope to succeed today without a decision-making process that facilitates choices among competing social goals and ethical considerations. Sufficient time must be devoted to developing this process, including the involvement of broader circles of citizens in examining the choices in an informed way. The challenges of such complex decision making can best be met by flexible and adaptive management. A management system that is flexible, responsive to surprises, capable of midcourse corrections, and effective in its interaction with concerned segments of the public has the greatest possibility of success.

  • International cooperation can help achieve national solutions. Cooperation especially can help less advantaged nations, for example, those with more limited financial means, small nuclear programs, or unfavorable geology. Cooperation can range from shared research programs to shared storage or disposal facilities offered by a host country to other nations. Sharing technology and facilities will reduce the cost burden for all the cooperating nations and will facilitate the establishment of internationally accepted standards. Progress in adopting a solution in one country serves as a positive example to other countries.

PRINCIPAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations from the study are discussed in Chapter 3. The following brief discussion presents the principal recommendations.

    1. National organizations with responsibility for the management of HLW, together with the scientific and engineering communities (including social scientists), should provide the leadership and support for solving the problems posed by HLW. Because the current situation in many countries does not present an urgent safety hazard and because the issue of radioactive waste management is extremely sensitive politically, there is a temptation to postpone or avoid decisions and actions. Nevertheless, the safety problem is immediate in some countries and will grow elsewhere as more waste is generated and new storage facilities become necessary. Moreover, security concerns will grow as more fissile material arises from dismantling nuclear weapons unless a disposition route for this material is prepared. Accordingly, actions are needed to generate options, understand their implications, and involve the public in the choice of approaches to safe and secure disposition.

    2. National HLW programs should expand their efforts beyond technical project development and implement processes that involve the public in decisions to assure safety and security. A decision is by definition a choice between at least two alternatives. In a democracy, the

Page
4