. "10 Teaching to Promote the Development of Scientific Knowledge and Reasoning About Light at the Elementary School Level." How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom
Metz, K.E. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction,22(2), 219-290.
Mortimer, E.F. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science and Education,4, 267-285.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2003). Learning and instruction: A SERP research agenda. M.S. Donovan and J.W. Pellegrino (Eds.), Panel on Learning and Instruction, Strategic Education Research Partnership. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Newmann, F.M., Marks, H.M., and Gamoran, A. (1995). Authentic pedagogy: Standards that boost student performance. (Issue Report #8, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.) Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research, University of Wisconsin.
Osborne, R. (1983). Towards modifying children’s ideas about electric current. Research in Science & Technological Education,1(1), 73-82.
Osborne, R., and Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Palincsar, A.S., and Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction,1, 117-175.
Palincsar, A.S., and Magnusson, S.J. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and text-based investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. Carver and D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 151-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Palincsar, A.S., Anderson, C.A., and David, Y.M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal,93(5), 643-658.
Palincsar, A S., Magnusson, S.J., and Hapgood, S. (2001). Trafficking ideas through the rotaries of science instruction: Teachers’ discourse moves and their relationships to children’s learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Schwab, J.J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In G.W. Ford and L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6-30). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S., and Richert, E.R. (1988). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking. New York: Taylor and Francis.