|
Items in cart [4] |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 553
Numerical Prediction of Scale Effects in Ship Stern Flows with
Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models
L. Eca ( nstituto Superior Tecnico, Portugal)
M. Hoekstra (Maritrne Research Institute, Netherlands)
Abstract
his pcper presents c m mericcl mve tigation of
sccle effects on ship tem flows he mo t popu-
kr cigebrcic, one-equation md two-equation eddy-
viscosity turbulence models are successfully cpplied
to fhe calcoktion of fhe flow aro md fhe Mystery
tmkerfiom modelup to full sccle R y oldsmmber
It is show that fhe choice of the tmbulence model
does have m i fluence m fhe results (notably fhe
near wake fleld), but the dffferences c msed by ch mg-
mg fhe turbulence model tff~d to dim mish wifh the m-
crecse of th Rey olds m mber
1 Introducidon
One of the mcin cdvmtages of Computatiorurl
Fhid Dynamics (CF ) over haditiork~l model testmg
is the potenticl) c mctility to p~edict R y olds m m-
ber effects on fhe flow fleld aro md c ship But be-
fore this cdvmtage cmbe exploited, two major tasks
arise he fl st is to chmge th potenticl ccpability
to c true ccpability by mcking sme fnat fhe m mer-
iccl method c m cope with the ext~eme reqmir ments
posedbyfl wsimohtionsatfullscaleR y oldsmm-
ber he second task is to go th ough fhe verffcation
md validation processes
Only c few ctt mpts to p~edict scale effects with
CF have been reported One such cttempt is [I ], p~e-
sentmg ~esults, h wever, which are not m mericcily
convmcing he present cubhors have show to be
more succes dul in computmg ship stern fl ws from
model up to full sccle R y olds n mbers, [2], with
ver iflca t ion of m m ericcl error s, [3] md [ 4] U for -
tmutely, there me vi tually no ~elictle experimentcl
dch a~ihtle for full scale ship tem flows, so that
fhe validation process is obsh ucted he best fhing to
do is thff~ to inxecse fhe level of co fldence by vali-
datmg et model-sccle R y olds m mber md sh wmg
fnatw 11-kmow t~endsforR inxecsmgaresytem-
ctically reproduced
~ the hst two decad s, chuge efforthcs been mcde
to validate CF predictions et model sccle R y olds
n mber H wever, the present tat s is far from be-
mg completely satisfactory Notably fhe accurcte p~e-
diction of the axicl velocity fleld in regions of high
treamwise vorticity hcs proved to be diff cult Some
success hcs been ckimed for second moment clo-
sures, e g [5] But if one cims et selecting c tmbu-
lence closure that is m merically robust et model and
f 11 sccle R y olds n mbers, eddy-viscosity models
are still fhe only ~ecsoruible choice
~ fhis p mer we present c m mericcl inve tigation
mto fhe prediction of sccle effects with eddy-viscosity
tmbulence models, mcludmg cigeb~aic, one~quation
md two-equation models Two mcin gocis are con-
side~ed:
e Ir~stigate which turbulence m odels are m meri-
ccily robu t from model up to f 11 sccle R y olds
m mbers, without fhe need of fmfher t ming
e Evalucte fhe i fluence of fhe R y olds n mber
on fhe diffe~ences betw en sohtions obtamed
with dffferent eddy-viscosity tmbulence models
With cchie ing these gocis, we expect to inxecse the
co fldence m fhe use of CF et full sccle R y olds
n mbers, usmg turbulence models that have been
origincily d veloped for thin shear hyers et model
sccle Rey olds m mbers
The pcper is orgmised in fhe following way: sec-
tion 2 gives c brief description of fhe tmbulence mod-
els md fheir m mericcl impleme htion The ~esults
of cpplication to fhe fl w aro md the Myste y t mker
ctR y oldsn mbersfiommodelsccleuptofullsccle
Rn me presented md discussed in section 3 Section
4 summarizes fhe conchsions of fhe pcper
OCR for page 554
2 Turbulence Models
~ order to cover ~ broad spech m of eddy-
viscosity tmbuler e models, w bav considered 6be
following models:
e Algebraicmodels
Cebeci & Smith, [6, (CS)
Baldwin & Lomax [7], (BL)
e Or ~quationmodels
Spalart & Allmaras, [8], (SA)
Menter, [9], (MT
k—d models
* Two-kyer model, [10], (KE-TL)
* Cbien's low-Rn model, [11], (KE
k—m mod is
* Stmdard, [12], (KV~
* M nter, [13], (KVvM)
q—5 model, [14], (Q~
Tbe or -eq wtion model of Baldwin & Bardb, [15],
md 6be SST v sion of M nter's k—m model, [13],
w re aIso tested How v r, remlts of 6bese models
will notbe mcluded indbe presentpaper Tbe Baldwm
& Barth model sh wed ~ v ry poor bebaviour m 6be
mitial te t r ms, while the SST v sion of Menter's
k_ m does r t perform berer 6 m 6be other k_ m
models te ted
It is poss~ble to improv 6be quality of the pr dic-
tions of ship tern flows wibb the or -equation md
two-equation tmbuler e models usmg ~ simple cor-
r ction to the production term of 6be hansport equa
tions, [16] However, in 6bis paper w will gdopt 6be
tmdardv rsionsofthemodels
2.1 Algebraic Models
Tbe two algcbrdic models are w 11-kmown md
based m ~ two-hyer d flmition of the eddy viscosity,
v~, where 6be eddy viscosity is obtamed from 6be m m-
im m of its values m 6be two 1ayers ~ 6be i mer-
kyer, bobb models use 6be mixmg-length approach
wibb the Vm D lest dgmping f mction m 6be r ar-wall
rgim
~ 6be Cebeci & Smithmodel, the eddy viscosity in
6be outer region is obtair d from
(v,)O = 0.0168q~6~ j (1)
wher q~ stmds for tb v locity at 6be edge of the
viscous region md 6* is the dispkcement thick-
r ss, which is m integ al parameter deflmed for 2-D
bo mdary-hyer fl ws, md ~ is the mtemmitter y fac-
tor, which is giv nby
~ =
2)
wher 6 is 6be thickmess of tb viscous region
~ ~ ship stem flow calcohtion, perfommed m
curvilirRar coordir~te system, (; ~ 5)l some as-
sumptions bav to be made to compute q~, 6* md ~
We detemm me these q mtities fi om i fommation along
each g id lir normal to 6be wall md the viscous 1ayer
6bickmessiscalcoktedfr mbbetotathead D tailson
6be calcoktion of q~, 6* md ~ me giv n m [16]
Tbe main advmtage of 6be Baldwin & Lomax
model ov r 6be Cebeci & Smibb model is the abser e
of 6 md 6* fiom the deflmition of 6be lengh scale
m 6be outer r gion in 6be Baldwm & Lomax model,
(v,jO is giv nby
wher
(V~>o = 0-ol68ccpl;~cledFw te i
(3)
Fwww = mm (ymwFmwicCud If (4)
Fmw is 6be maxim m of the f mction
F=yrlwl(l—e~~ ) (5)
md y w is 6be value of Yr where F w occurs Ud~f is
6be differer e betw en the maxim m md mmim m
values of q along m ~ g id lir, I Wl is 6be magmitude
of 6be v rticity v ctor, A = 26 md Yr is 6be non-
dimff~siorul di tance to 6be wall in wall coordir~tes
Ftl~d is 6be equivalent of ~, md is giv by
Ftied ~ 6 (6)
+ ~ tledymw)
Ccp = 1.6, Cg = 0 25 md Ctl~d = 0-3
Althoughtb calcuhtionofFww~ mdymw seemsto
be stmighfforward, it is not Tbe values of these two
parameters me directly rehted to 6be v rticity, which
ismv selyproportiorultotheg idlmedi tanceinthe
phy ical space Tbis depender y of F on 6be v rticity
makes its m merical calcuhtion extr mely sensitiv to
'4t sstemwisecoordinde.~t sooordt decorm~lolhe
hipsmbace md~t sgtdhwisecoordinde
OCR for page 555
OCR for page 556
OCR for page 557
OCR for page 558
OCR for page 559
OCR for page 560
OCR for page 561
OCR for page 562
OCR for page 563
OCR for page 564
OCR for page 565
OCR for page 566
OCR for page 567
OCR for page 568
Representative terms from entire chapter:
turbulence models
6he me m flow field, which dep nds on v~ md is d -
termin d itemtiv Iy To cvoid umdershoots md ov -
shoots of the eddy viscosity, the spaticl variction of
Y~~m; must be limited in 6he present implemenbtion,
6he following limiters are cdopted
0.95y,,m,
2.2.3 Boundary Condfldons
~ c ship tem flow cclculation we n cd to spec-
ffy boumdary conditions et 6he si boumdaries of 6he
domcm: mlet, outlet, ship su face, ship symme-
hy pkme, fiee suface: md external b mdary The
boumdary conditi ms are specffed in the wme way
for both on ~quation tu bulence m odels At the ship
surfae the tmbulent qumtities are vmo md symme-
hy conditions are cpplied on 6he flee su face md et
6he ship s symmeby plane At the outlet, the sheam-
wise derivativ of 6he tu bule t qumtities is cssumed
tobe:owo Di ichletboumdaryconditionsme imposed
for the tu bulent qumtities on 6he external boumdary
md are fl cd by 6he valu on 6he border of the inlet
pkme The p~esent calcoktions w re pe formed only
for 6he di p ut of the ship; 6he mlet plane is located et
mid-ship, md so there is cl ecdy c viscous ~egion in
6he inlet pkme A t mdard st~aighffo ward procedme
was cdopted to deflme the tmbulent qumtities et 6he
mlet plane: v~ is ccl ulated with 6he Cebeci & Smi6h
algeb~aic model md the tmbuient qumtities are 6hen
deriv d fi om the km wn eddy-viscosity
2.3 Two-equation Models
2.3.1 Two-layer k—~
The two-kyer k—d model p~esented by Chen
md Pctel m [10] solv s two h m port equstiom in
6he outer flow region ~ 6he n ar-wall region only
6he equation fcr 6he tmbulen e kmetic en rgy, k, is
solv d The valu of d is deriv d from m clgebrcic
length sccle The n ar-wall model is equivalent to 6he
on -equationmodel of Wolishtein, [17]
The eddy-viscosity is obtain d fi om
V, = C~—
(I 5)
md k md d for c stecdy flow me obtain d from 6he
solution of 6he equations:
=v~S+V ((v+—)Vk)—~ (16)
md
=C~kv~S+V I~,l~,v+—JVeJ—C k (17)
the n ar wall region, d is detemmmed from
kl i
c=0.416 / j
(l 8)
slmbe presecl o~ ml dioc we haw m ed Ihe double model m
prox m diom md so Ihe tree whace is ssymmet y~l me
wi6h
md
/e =Yr (1—e—o 263de~) (19)
Rq = Y
20)
The f~ f mction deflmed by the Woffshtem on -
equation model is
I—e—O.Ol de~
f~ = I _~0.~63de,
21)
The stmdard k—d constmts me cp = 0.09, Cl =
1.44, C: = 1.92, t = I md t = 1.3
The k y fectme of 6his two-kyer m odel is the deter-
minati m oftheboumdarybetwe nthe im~er md outer
kyers which is often deflmed by c criteri m based on
y However, withy it is diflflcult to establish c cri-
terion which is insensitiv to 6he Rey olds m mber in
ou cpprocch, 6he i mer-lcyer region is deflmed by the
following criteric:
f~ < 0.99 Ay < 50 .
The fl t criterion would be 6he nstmal choice to bor-
der 6he im r-hyer ~egion How v r, in the iterctiv
detemmination of the eddy viscosity fleld it may lecd
to excessiv Iy large regions, which provoke m meri-
calconvergeneproblems Therefore,w hav cdded
6he second criterion which originates fi om the kmowl-
edge on flct pkte boumdary kyers, where the fully-
tmbuient region starts et y ~ 30 - 50 This cp-
procch does not guarmtee that 6he f~ is close to I et
6he edge of im~er-kye' Therefore, m 6he outer-hyer
6he d h m port equation is solv d but f~ is still ob-
tain d from (21)
As in 6he one-equation models, iyr>~. deflmed by
equation (11 ), is used in the wake to ~epresent the dis-
tmce to the wall
2.3.2 Ctden's k—d model
The low R y olds k—d model proposed by Chien,
[11], does not distingmish betw en im r md outer
kyers md is directly cpplicable in 6he n ar-wall ~e-
gion The eddy viscosity is obtamed from equation
(15) The k md d h m port equations of this model
D k v S + V ( (v + vt ) Vk) _ _ 2 k 22)
md
~f = C, kV,S—k ~C2fi~ + T] +
V ((v+ vq,}V~) .
7he near wall dampmg f mctions are giv n by:
f~ = I _ e_c~; j
7he model constants are
t=l—I 8e {~~) . 25)
cp = 0.09 j Cl = 1.35 j C: = 1.8
t =1 j t =1.3
C3=0.0115 j C4=0.5 .
2.3.3 Standard k—m model
7he k—m model hcs been proposed by Wilcox,
[12] it obtams 6he eddy-viscosity from
k
V, =—
md k md m are obtsined fiom 6he solution of 6he
equations:
giv by (27) 7he m t msport equation is re-w itten
as :
¢= ~S+2(1—Fl)(q~:Q~Vk.Vm+
v.~4v+ V, NV~-hw:
23) \\ ~./ J 29)
whe~e th con t mts of 6he model, for convemence
24) mbolicclly dffmted by ¢~, me obtamed from
¢,=F,f,+(I—F,)~
7he ¢1 set of constmtsis6he one ofthe t mdardk—m
model md the ,6 set of constmts has beff~ deriv d
fiomthek—smodel mdisgiv nby:
~ = 0 4404 i h~ = 0 09 i h: = 0.0828 j
(t >~=1 j (qw)~=1,l7 j
7he blendmg function, F. is giv by
F. = t mh (org4) j
(3o)
wi6h
I ~ ~ SOOv 4(qw)2k
t/rg=mm LmaX ~o 090)Yri y 0) i CD~
26) (31)
md
CDKW=maX(2(q~20~3 t~ ~ jlO-~° (32)
k VS+V ((V+Vt)Vk)—hS k 27) 2.35 q—S model
md
Dt S+V ((v+` )Vm)—hm . 28)
7he m equationc mbe integ cted d wnto the wall
md the model con t mts me:
c = 0.5532 j h~ = 0.09 i h = 0 075 i
t =2 j q~=2.
2.3.4 Menterts k—m model
M nter's v rsion of 6he k—m model, [13], is c
blendmgbetw enthek—~ mddhek—mmodels 7he
objectiv of 6he model is to solv the m equation in 6he
near wall ~egion, which does not ~equi e exhc damp-
mg f mctions, wherecs m 6he octer region of the flow
6he ~ h m port equation is solv d
As m the t mdard k—m model,6he eddy viscosity
is computed from 26) md the k t mspo t equati m is
7he q—5 model is proposed m [14] It is c two-
equation model deriv d from 6he k—~ m odel wi6h the
objectiv of having tmbulent q mtities which go to
vmo et the wall 7he two turbulent q mtities of the
model, q md 5 are rehted to k md ~ by
(33)
7he h msport equations of q md 5 are deriv dfr m
6he h mspo t equations of k md ~ with the rehtions:
Dq = I Dk
Z)F 2qNf
D ~Ds _ ~Dq
Ot ~ ~T q Ot
~ 6he p~esent impl menbtion of the method,
hien's low Rey olds v rsion of 6he k—~ model was
cdopted to obbin 6he h msport equations of q md 5
7he eddy-viscosity is giv nby
v~ =C~f~25
(34)
(3s)
ad
7 he near wall dampmg fumctions are giv n by:
D] vtS + V . ( (v + Vt ) Vq)—S—y j (3 6)
D; C ~vS C ~a C 5
~F Ciq~- <2f<2q- 43f<3~+
V ((V+ t ) VS)
(37)
f~ = 1—e~°-°l 15Y~ (38)
C<:f<: = 2.6 - 0.792e (~) j (39)
1~N
7 he model const mts are
C<3f<3 =2e ~ J_I. (40)
cp= 0.09 j C
6he skin friction coefficient for the flow on z flzt phte
Ther for, only 6he fl st option is lef to zvoid the use
of z g id-dependent bo mdary c mdition in this paper
w shall compme two zlternativ s: i) zdopt equation
(43) with N~ in hding viscous conections to deflme
6he n ar~ll values of m, BCI; md ii) obtzm m zt 6he
wall fi om equation (44), BC2
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 General
All calcuhtions w re carried out with the computer
code PARNASSOS, [19], which solv s the R y olds
Av raged Nzvier-Stokes equations m thei complete
form [20] The test case m 6his paper is the flow
aro md 6he D e ~dy te y) tmker which has ear-
lier been subject of c mparativ computations m 6he
Gothenburg md Tokyo Workshops, [21] md [22]
Two main reasons justify this choice: the flow is
sufflciently complex to test 6he ccuray of 6he tm-
bulen models, md, in particular, it e hibits, zt lez t
zt model scale R y olds m mber, the socalled 'hook
shape' of the isolmes of the axial v locity zt 6he end
of 6he stern, zs z r sult of the existen of shongbilge
v rtices A detailed m merical v rff cation st dy has
ben pe formed with PARNASSOS for this test case,
bodh zt model scale R y olds n mber, [3], md full
cale R y olds m mber, [4], which permits 6he selec-
tion of z g id with sufflcient resolution
~ 6he pr sent tudy, flv dffferent Rey olds m m-
bers hav been consider d: 5 x 1o6, 2 x 107, 1Os,
5 x 108 md 2 x 109, with 6he R y olds n mber d -
flmedby
R =—.
v
A Cartesi m coordinate system is inh oduced with
6he z axis zlong the mdisturbed sheam, the z axis
v rtical positiv pomtmg upwards md y completing
z right-h md system The origin of the coordinate sys-
tem is located on the forward p rpendicular zt 6he ship
mmet y phne on the k cl Ime All the variables pr -
sented cc made non-dimensional using U~ md l zs
6he v locity md length r fer n e cales
The c mputational domain covers only 6he flow
fleld n ar 6he tem The inlet md outlet phne are z
c mst mt pkmes The inlet pkme is located zt z = 0.5l
md 6he outlet phne zt z = I.25l Th extemal b md-
aryis mellipticalcylinder,giv nby:
y ~ /z—0.056lN
(0,149) +1~ 0,140 J =
The r mainmg bo mdaries are 6he fiee surice, pkme
z = 0.056l, 6he symmeby phne of the ship, y = 0,
md the hull surface
The vol me g ids w r cr zted wi6h z proprietary
elliptic PDE g id gen ztor, based on 6he GRAPE zp-
proach [23] The m mber of g id nodes in 6he sheam-
wise md gi thwise di ection is the same fcr 6he fl e
R y olds m mbers: N; = 161 md N: = 41 The
n mber of g id nodes in 6he normal di ection, N~, m-
creases wifh R N~ = 81 for fhe low st R md 10
g id lin s cc zdded each time R is mcreased, which
leads to N~ = 121 for R = 2 x 109 The g id lin
p cing in the ncrmal di ection is deflmed by on -
dim nsiorul str tching f mctions, which are t med to
obtamamaxim mvalueofy ztfheflsthyerofgid
nod s zway fiom fhe ship smfce of zpproximately
05
Fiv sigmiflc mt flow p~meters w re selected to
compme the dffferent m merical sol tiom:
e Friction r sistance coeflflcie t~ CDI:
CD!
(~3U') 14 xo<|did
-pU l:
e Pr ssure resi tance coefflcient, CDP:
CD =2Jcp(4xo<) ~did5
e Wzke frction, Wf:
W = 1: (I— ) d
e Maxim m cross-sheam v locity zt z = 0.989l,
(Vw~m~,, with Vw = J:u )2 + (U3~.
e Minim m axial v locity compon nt m fhe flow
fleld. Um~r
The maxim m cross-sheam v locity zt z = 0.989l
is r hted to fhe bilge vortex intensity md U~ ~r identi-
fles fhe exi ten e of sheamwise flow separation The
mteg zls in hded in the deflmitions of CDI. CDF md
Wf are evaluated with G mssim quadratme rules as-
summg zbi-lmear variation of fhe urJmownsbetw en
fhe g id nodes The arez Q for the calcoktion of the
wake fi ction is fhe propeller di c, which has be n IO-
cated zt z = 0.989l wifh fhe axis of the propeller zt
z = 0.0166l; the die radius is R = 0.015l, while z
ero hub mdius h~s been zss med.
3.2 Wall Boundary Condition for tO
To mv stigate fhe i flu n e of fhe m mericel im-
plementation of the wall boumdary condition of P.
Varietle
CD! X 1 O
CD X 1 O
Wf
uW)m:~
mir 4
L.Vt~me' X 10
(V~>m~; X 1O
BCt
1 944
0911
0 609
0 343
-0 075
0 265
I 582
BC2
1 612
0 878
0 565
0 365
-0 076
0 257
I 504
Tetle 1: Comparison of solutioms obtamed with
Mbuter's k—P model usi g differ nt implementa-
tions of the P wall boumdary condition
w hav calcuiated the flpw et f = Sxl06 with
Mbuter's v rsion of the k—P model with fhe two op-
tions considered: BCt, which obteins P from fhe th -
or ticel valu for y < 2.5 md BC2, which is based
on m od hoc deflmition of c flmite valu et fhe wall
Tetle I presents the fl e selected flpw qumtities md
fhe me m md maximum valu s of v~ obtamed with
BCt md BC2
The dffferen s obtain dbetwe n fhe two solutions
are certamly not neglig~ble As on might expect, fhe
fi iction resist mce coefflcient, CDf, e hibits the largest
d fference How v r, the limitmg treamlin s of both
prlcuiations, which are depicted m flgme I, are simi-
~ BCZ, (T~)c
Figme 1: Limiti g sheamlmes for Mbuter's k—P
model wifh dffferent wall boumd uy conditions
At fhe propeller pime, x = 0.989l, fhere me sig-
nffc mt differen es between fhe isolin s of the axiel
v locity, as shown in flgme 2 With BCt the speed is
deflnitely Ipwer in the i mer wake th m with BC2
0.0<
\ 0.01
A rlC
0~00 0 0 i O.O2 0.03 0 04
02
os
04
05
~ o:
~ 0.7
v o:
~ Oq
Y/~
Figme 2: A ial v locity isolin s et x = 0.989l for
Mbuter's k—P model wifh d fferent wall bp mdary
conditions
These r suits show that th flpw prediction is
clearly dependent onthe m mericel implementation of
fhe P wall boumdary condition They suggest ft et the
P behaviou et the wall c mhardlybe seen es c shong
pomt of the k—P models From the r suits it is not
clear which is fhe best choip,BCt or BC2, how v r,
as discussed etov, the re mlts of BC2 me irJ~erently
g id-dependent Therefore, w will edopt BCt for the
r meinmg prlcuiations wifh fhe k—P models
3.3 Scaling EEects
The results of fhe fl e selected flow qumtities md
fhe maximum valu of v~ me giv n m table 2 for the
fl e R y olds numbers md for th various tu bulence
models te ted ~ st mds for the maximum dffferen
betw en th predLctions of th different tubulenee
models et c giv n Rey olds m mber Th dffferen s
betw en predictions wifh dfferent tubulen e mod-
els come out es mprecietle et model scele R y olds
number but tend to diminish with the mcrease of the
R y olds m mber A e peption is foumd in fhe maxi-
mum cross-sh eam v locity et the propeller pi me; it is
fhe only on of the selected flow varietles which does
not ch mge m on tonicelly with the Rey olds m mber
Figme 3 pr sents the friction resi tanee coefflcients
giv n in tdole 2 We hav tried to compme the r suits
wifh two fi ietion Imes, the ITTC lin .
(CDf)° {i 'f ~ 2)2 i
Va~ nble
CD!
xlo4
Cl o4
Wf
(Vw~mcD
Ul ~r
(V~)mm:
xlo4
SXIO6
2xl07
108
SxlO~
2xlO9
sxlo6
2xl07
108
SxlO~
2xlO9
SXIO6
2xl07
108
SxlO~
2xlO9
SXIO6
2xl07
108
SxlO~
2xlO9
SXIO6
2xl07
108
SxlO~
2xlO9
SXIO6
2xl07
108
SxlO~
2xlO9
CS
I 573
1269
1 22
0846
0732
0598
0527
0466
0423
04 2
0528
0462
0397
0347
0315
0209
0199
0203
0206
0208
-0012
0004
0 000
0 000
O 000
2 327
1 979
1 647
1 374
1173
Sf
1 816
1 469
1177
0965
0825
0788
0720
0649
0605
0578
0632
0547
0452
0393
0352
0280
0301
0302
0294
0263
-0059
-O 055
-0035
-O 005
0 000
1 627
1 338
I 093
0917
0780
MT
1 606
1 335
1 098
0916
0791
0741
0648
0583
0547
0535
0619
0535
0454
0393
0353
0290
0289
0276
0252
0228
-0068
0040
-O 001
0 000
0 000
1259
1 026
0845
0711
0626
KE-TL
I 561
1280
I 059
0885
0767 ,
o7l3
0638
0580
o s43
0542
0563
0493
0421
0369 1
0334 1
0287
0286
0262
0229
0227
-0028
-0007 1
o ooo 1
o ooo 1
o ooo 1
lil3 1
0927 1
0798
0660
0556
KE
598
3ls
082
9oo
0776
0687
0645
0604
7o
0565
0576
0512
437
0380
0341
0266
0284
0284
0256
1 0229
1 -o ols
-0016
1
1 o ooo
1 o ooo
9s
0965
0823
0 708
0586
rQZ I
44
ll97
0988
0824
o7l3
o 655
0614
o 589
os7
o s7
o 532
o 479
o4
0 365
0 330
0 263
0 271
0 268
0244
0 228
7 1
1
o ooo 1
o ooo 1
o ooo 1
1 046
o 889
0742
0 603 1
osos 1
KW
1 939
I 546
1 213
0 981
0 841,
o 923
o 829
0744
0690
0 648
0616
o 532
o4
0384
0 345
0 347
0 378
0 396
0 395
0 336
7
065
4
27 1
o ooo 1
492
l 318
o 93
0 763
0 700
K\AfM
944
47
1221
983
0 843,
9
0817
0732
0675
0638
0609
3
449
0386
0345
0343
0367
0377
0369
0331
7
-0 064
-°°41
1 -0 034 1
1 oooo 1
582
1361
4
0862
0756
r~
499
3so
0233
4l
3o
325
0 320
0278
0267
0236
4
085
7
0 046
0 038
0 138
0 179
0 193
0 189
0 128
063
061
4l
1 o o34
1 o ooo
281
9o
9os
800
0 668
Table 2: Comparison of solutions obtamed with the
md the Schoe herr line,
0 242 = loglO (Rn(CDf)O~s) j
Smce our computation domam covers the afi haff of
6he hull only, w have estimated 6he equivalent plate
fi iction of 6he aftbody as
Di)pl [2(CDI>O(.R )—(CD )O ( )~ T
whe~e Sw is th wetted surface of the ship included
m 6he computatiom~l domam, which is ass med to be
half of the total w tted surface The p~edictions of a11
6he turbulence models e h~bit the correct hend with
sewval turbulence models at different Rey olds n mbers
6he mcrease of the Rey olds m mber, but there is
clear diffe~ence m slope
As ~ fur6her relevmt result, w have plotted the
ae m wake fracti m, Wf, as afunction of the Rey olds
~ mber m figme 4 It is interesting to note 6~t m both
igmes 3 md 4 the~e is good ag eement betweff~ the
iA model md the two k—m models, K\Af md K\AfM
The calculated limitmg sheamlines at R = 5 x I o6,
b'= 108 mdRn=2 x lO9are illu trated mfigmes 5
o 7 fcr th models CS, ~iA, MT, K\Af, KWM md KE
As in the previous re mits, 6he dffferences betw en
he predictions of the various tmbulence models tend
o diminish with 6he inmease of Rn Once mme, the
2.5F
2.0
o
~ ~ 5
. . . _
1.0
0.6
6.
~ MT
; td
W?
:. ttt
ITTC \<
Schoenher:
+CS *SA hKE
O MT ~ KE TL
f QZ
1~ KW
0 KWM
7 6 9 10.
LogtO(Rn)
Figme 3: Friction resistmce coeffcient of the cft-
body, CD! CS C f motion of the Rey olds m mber for
fhe variocs turtclence models tested
0.65F
o 6ot
o 55t
- o 50t
o 45t
o 40t
o 35t
O 30~
6
+C3 *3A xKE
* OMT ~ KE TL
~QW
x O KWM
A ~
+
k3
+
3
+ ~
+
7 6 9 10
Log t o (Rn)
Figme 4: Wcke ficotion, Wf, es c f motion of fhe
Rey olds m mber for the seve~al turtclff~qe models
tested
~esclts of the SA, mw md mw v~ models are very sim-
ilar: At full qcle, f = 2 x 109, the CS, MT md KE
also show good cg e ment
he axicl velocity isolines et fhe propeller pkme,
x = 0.989l, et fhe same f ee Rey olds m mbers,
5 x 106, 108 md2 x 109, are presented infigmes 8 to
I O he turbulence models i qlcded are cgain the CS,
SA, MT, KW, K\AfM md KE he Ul isolines e hlbit
Figme S: Limitmg sheamlmes ctf = S x 106
c d c tic i fiue qe of f At model scale, fhe t pical
hOOk shape' does cppear for th k—m models, md
to some extent, for fhe one-eq wtion mod 1s5 SA md
MT Hqwever, et x = 0.989l, the 'hook shape' tends
to discpp ar wifh fhe i q~ecse of fhe Rey olds m m-
ber At f = 2 x 109, nqDe of fhe p~edictioms e h~bits
c hOOk shape' md d fferff~qes betweff~ the resclts of
fhe variocs m odels, i qhding the clgebrcic CS m odel,
are rcther smell
his effect of f is ~eMted to the st~etch ng of the
b ilge qrt :x, genemte d wif hin fhe ship b o mdary Icyer
which red ces its thick ess with the i q~ecse of f
Figmes I I to 13 illc trcte the cross- trem velocity
field et x = 0.989l for fhe same f ee Rey olds m m-
bers he plots i qlcde fhe CS, MT md K\AfM mod-
els Although there me some dffferences betwen the
p~edictions of the f ee models ew~n et f = 2 x 109,
xsm co e Deo ,mese remoco om eeas~ylmprov
wi h s s mple ooneotlm t the grodcotloc temm o the tr m
eqc diOC of he twbulect qc mtity
Figme6:Limiting treamlinesatR =108
The tretchmg of The bilge vo tex with The increase of
R is clear for the th ee models
We should note 6~t The present results do not im-
ply 6~t the t pick hook shape' of The al velocity
isoh es disappears with The inverse of R. it just m-
pearsfmtherdow sheam Figmel4presentsth ve-
locity field et x = I.ll obtained with the IC.'JM model
for Rn = 2 x 109 At this location, the bilge vo tex is
almo t axisymmetric md The Ul plot shows The typi-
cal 'hook shape', which is mder t mdbly w cker 6 m
et the propeller plane et m odel sac e, bec mse The bilge
vortex has not only rolled up m the near wake but it
has also diffused
4 Conclusions
We have presented remits of c m meri cl inves-
tigation of scaling effects in ship stern flows using
algebraic , one -e quct ion md two ~ qua t ion turbulence
Figure 7: Limiting mecml es et R = 2 x 109
models The turbulence models w He all implemented
without my special t ming d pendent on the R y olds
n mber
For the two-equation k—m models, we have
pouted out the deficiencies of c widely accepted mm-
mericcl implementation of The wall bo mdary condi-
tion of m
The results of The ccicoktion of The -I w aro md
The IA e (mystery) t taker et -i e R y olds m mbers,
5x 109,2 x 107,109, 5x 109 md2x 109, suggestthe
following conclusions:
e it is possible to simulate m merically ship stern
-I wsfrommodeluptof llsccleRey oldsmm-
bers with the most popular eddy-viscosity tmbu-
lence models, mcludmg algebraic, oneequation
md two-equation models
e in global temms, The predictions e habit the same
Tend in the flow field with The increase of the
Rey olds m mber for all the turbulence models
A AA
A na
A A
0.0
A A
U.U ~U
0.01
0 00 0 01 0 02 0 03 0.04
~.u
A Aq
A A
A A 1
y/L
A A
U.U ~ UA
MT
0.01
0 00 0 01 0 02 0 03 0.04
.u
A Aq
A A
A A 1
A A
t 01
* OZ
O Os
04
as
~ as
s 07
os
os
y/L
0.0
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
y/L
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0 00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
y/L
0.01
0 00 0 01 0 02 0 03 0.04
y/L
Fit3~re (i: Axi4i vebc~t isolines 4t ~ = 0.989l ob-
+ ot
* 02
0 Os
04
as
~ cs
07
08
Og
+ ot
* 02
0 Os
04
cs
~ cs
07
08
~ OD
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
+ ct
* Oz
0 o3
o4
os
os
~ 07
os
~ OD
000 001 002 003 0. 04
y/L
Fit3~re 7: Axi4i velocit isolines 4t ~ = 0.989l ob-
Do
N
0.0
0.0
0.0
A n
r/
w.u (S
0.0
0 00 0 01 0 02 0 03 0.04
y/L
0.04 ~
0.0
0.0
N
.1
~ I
0.0
A ~
oo h
oo h
1
0.01
A ~
y/L
0.04 ~ ~
w.w
KE
0.01
0 00 0 01 0 02 0 03 0.04
y/L
Ot
OF
04
04
o~
06
07
09
09
Fit3~re 8: Axi41 velocit isolines 4t ~ = 0.989l ob-
hined 4t Rn = 2 x 109
~ ~A
... .
0.01 g~) ~
0.00 0 01 0.02 0 03 0.04
N
0.0
0.0
y/L MT
·~W
0.00 0 01 0.02 0 03 0.04
y/L KWM
i>3~re 9: T~nsverse velocit field st ~ = 0.989l ob-
hined 4t Rn = s x I o6
o.ol
o.oo .
0.01
M
O.01 ; V
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
y/L CS
004
0.01
0 00 0 01 0.02 0 03 0.04
y/L MT
004
0.01
0 00 0 01 0.02 0 03 0.04
y/L KWM
Figure 10: Transverse velocity field et ~ = 11.989l ob-
tained et Rn = I 09
~ i
\
N
\
N
U.U
0.0
~ fit
0.0
0.0
::~ ~
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
y/L CS
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
y/L MT
AAt i ;~\
o.ol Alto ~~'~Ir~I~;~ ~~ v \ ~~ N ~ ~ \
0.00 0 01 0.02 0 03 0.04
y/E KWM
~ ~t3~e 11: Trarisverse velocity field et ~ = 0.989l ob-
tained et Rn = 2 x 109
\
~ . ~ ~
nn~
nn~
nn
not
nn~
002
nn,
n nn
0.01
ooz
0 oo 0.01 0 oz 0 03 0 04
+ 07t
~ 076
0 o79
~z
09s
ggs
~ 09t
~ 094
y/L
Figme 12 Velo ity field et I / l bbm d with
Menter k t m del et Rn 2 x ;O9 Above axwl
velocity, U', isolmes Below: cross- tream velocity
field
e The dismep mcies betw en figw fields obtamed
with diffe~ent tmbule ge models et c given
Rey olds n mber tend to decr cse wifh the m-
crecse of the Rey olds m mber
e Although fhe perfommance of the k—t models
seems to be wxy e souraging. fhe predictions
depend on fhe m merical implementation of fhe
t bo mdary conditigm et c solid surfae Some
implementations cdvised m fhe open literatme
are mass ptable
The present ~esults ~ei force fhe need for relictle
experimenbl dat4 et full secle Rey olds n mber for
41idation p gposes All eddywiscosity turbulff~se
models, used here, w re essentially developed for
bo mdary-kyers et modemte R y olds n mbers
References
[1] Wctson S JP, Bull PW - TheScolingofHigh
R y 71du Numben Vuco u Fbow Pnedictio u
Using CFD Technigu~ - Thi d Osakc Collo-
qui m, Osakc, Jcp m
[2] E94 L, Hock t c M -Numericol Colculotio u
of Ship St m Fbow ot Full S 71e R yno u
Numbens Twer&st Symposi m on Naval Ship
Hyd odynamics, Trondheim, June 1996
[3] Hoekst c M, Eg4 L - An Example of Eman
Ouantt icotion of Ship Reloted CFD Result -
7th N mericcl Ship Hyd odynamics Co fer-
e ge, N mtes, July 1999
[4] E94 L, Hock trc M - On 6he Numenicol Veni
ficohon of Ship St m Flow Colculoho u - I t
MARNET Workshop, Barcelo c, November
1999
[5] Deng G B. Visom m M - Componuon of Ex
plicit Algeb 7ic St~u Models ond S 7nd
Onden Tuxbulence Cbasumu fw Steody Flow
anound Ships - 7th N mericcl Ship Hyd ody-
rumics Co ference, N mtes, July 1999
[6] C beci T. Smith A M O. - Anoysu of Tum
bulent Boundo y l yens - Academic Press,
November 1984
[7] Bcl dwin B S. L omax H. - Th in yen App 7x
im7hon and Algeb 7ic Models fon S pon7t d
Tuxbul mt Flow - A AA Pcper 78-257, J m-
uary 1 978
[8] S pakr t P. R. Al l mares S R. - A One Eg uotio u
Tuxbul m s Model fon A 7dyn mic Flow
- A AA 30fh Aero pase Sciences Meeting,
R no, J m uy 1992
[9] Menter F. R - Eddy Vuc uih Tno up ntEguo
tio u and Th in Relohon to the k—9 Model -
Jo mcl of Fluids E gineering, Vol. 119, De-
cemberl997,pp 876-884
[10] Chen H. C, Pctel VC - Pnochcol Neom Woll
Tuxbulm sModelsiwComple~Flow Inckd
ing Sepon7hon - A AA 19th Fhid Dynam-
ics, Pksmc Dynamics md Lcsers Co ferff~ge,
J'me 8-10, 1987
[11] Chien KY - Pnediction of Channel and
Boundo y yen Flow wi6h o l~w Reynoldu
Numben Tuxbulence Model - A AA Jourrul,
Jarulary 1992, pp 33-38
[12] Wilcox D C -Turhd mce Model ing fw CFD -
DWC Indu tries 1993
[13] Menter FR - TwoEguotion EddyVucuih
Tuxbul mce Modeu fw Engine ing Applico
tio u - A AA Jomrml, Vol. 32, Aug t 1994,
pp 1598-1605
[14] GibsonMM,DcicAlhAA -Tw Eguohon
Modelfon Tuxbul mt Woll Fbow - A AA Jour-
m~l, Vol. 33, Aug st 1995, pp 1514-1518
[15] Bcldwin S B. Barth TJ - A OneEguotion
Tuxbul mce Tno up nt Model fw High
R yno u Woll Bounded Flow - A AA Pcper
91-0610, 29t Aerospace Sciences M etmg,
R noNevadc, January 1991
[16] Hoekst~a M - Numericol Simulotion of Ship
St~n Fbow wi6h o Spoce Moehing Noviem
Stok s Method - PhD Thesis D if University,
1999
[17] Wolishtein M - The Vebxih and Tempe?otu e
Dut ibution in One Dim ulonol Fbow with
Tuxbul mce Augm mtohon and P~uune Gno
dient - ~tenurtiorurl Jourm~l of Hect md Mess
T msfer,Vol 12,1969,pp 301-318
[18] Goldberg U. Peroomi m O. Chakravarfhy S.
- A Woll Dutonce Free k—~ Model with En
hanced NeomWoll Treotm mt - Jourm~l of Fh-
ids E gineering, Vol. 120, September 1998,
457-462
[19] Hoekst~a M, Ega L - PARNASSOS: An Ef i
cl mt Me6hod fon Ship Stern Flow Cole dotion
- Thi d Osakc Colloqui m on Ad anced CFD
Applications to Ship Flow md Hull Fcrm De-
sig, Osakc, hp m, l 998
[20] m der Ploeg A, Bgc L, Hoekst~a M - Com
bining Accuxacy and Ef ici m y wi6h Rob~ut
n u in Ship St nn Fbow Comp t tion - Twen-
thi d Symposi m onNcval Ship Hyd odynam-
ics, September 2000
[21] Larsson L, Pctel VC, Dy e G (eds ) - Ship
Vuco u Flow - Proceedmgs of 1990 SSPA-
CTH-IIHR Workshop, Flowtech Interm~tiorul
AB R se ch R po t Nt 2, Gothenburg, June
[22] Procedings of CFD Workshop Tokyo 1994,
Ship R search ~stitute Tokyo, March 1994
[23] Sorenson R. L - Th~Dim ulonol Gnd
Gmenahon obout Fight n Aienofl fon Zonol
Finite Dkfe~mce Comp t tio u - A AA 86-
0429 A AA 24th Aero pace Sciences Co fer-
ence, l 986, Rffm, NV
