References

Adams, Tamara, and Elizabeth A.Krejsa 2001 ESCAP II: Results of the Person Followup and Evaluation Followup Forms Review. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 24. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 12).

Adams, Tamara, and Xijan Liu 2001 ESCAP II: Evaluation of Lack of Balance and Geographic Errors Affecting Person Estimates. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 2. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 11).

Anderson, Margo J. 1988 The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

2000 Advertising and the census. Pp. 13–14 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J. Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

Anderson, Margo J., and Stephen E.Fienberg 2001a Counting and Estimation: Methodology for Improving the Quality of Censuses—The U.S. 2000 Census Adjustment Decision. Paper presented at the International Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Stockholm. Department of History, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Department of Statistics and Center for Automated Learning and Discovery, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. (August).

2001b Who Counts? Census-Taking in Contemporary America. Revised Paperback Edition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.


Bailar, Barbara A. 2000 Census testing. Pp. 62–66 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

Bateman, David V 1991 Post Enumeration Survey Evaluation Project P11: Balancing Error Evaluation. 1990 Coverage Studies and Evaluation Memorandum Series M-2. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Baumgardner, Stephanie K., Darlene A.Moul, Robin A.Pennington, Rebecca I.Piegari, Herbert F. Stackhouse, Kevin J.Zajac, Nick S.Alberti, Jennifer W.Reichert, and James B.Treat 2001 Quality of 2000 Census Processes. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-3. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28).

Bean, Susanne L. 2001 ESCAP II: Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Matching Error. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 7. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 12).

Brown, Lawrence D., M.L.Eaton, David A.Freedman, S.P.Klein, Richard A.Olshen, Kenneth W. Wachter , Martin T.Wells, and Donald Ylvisaker 1999 Statistical controversies in Census 2000. Jurimetrics 39:347–375.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment References Adams, Tamara, and Elizabeth A.Krejsa 2001 ESCAP II: Results of the Person Followup and Evaluation Followup Forms Review. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 24. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 12). Adams, Tamara, and Xijan Liu 2001 ESCAP II: Evaluation of Lack of Balance and Geographic Errors Affecting Person Estimates. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 2. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 11). Anderson, Margo J. 1988 The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. 2000 Advertising and the census. Pp. 13–14 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J. Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Anderson, Margo J., and Stephen E.Fienberg 2001a Counting and Estimation: Methodology for Improving the Quality of Censuses—The U.S. 2000 Census Adjustment Decision. Paper presented at the International Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Stockholm. Department of History, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Department of Statistics and Center for Automated Learning and Discovery, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. (August). 2001b Who Counts? Census-Taking in Contemporary America. Revised Paperback Edition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Bailar, Barbara A. 2000 Census testing. Pp. 62–66 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Bateman, David V 1991 Post Enumeration Survey Evaluation Project P11: Balancing Error Evaluation. 1990 Coverage Studies and Evaluation Memorandum Series M-2. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. Baumgardner, Stephanie K., Darlene A.Moul, Robin A.Pennington, Rebecca I.Piegari, Herbert F. Stackhouse, Kevin J.Zajac, Nick S.Alberti, Jennifer W.Reichert, and James B.Treat 2001 Quality of 2000 Census Processes. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-3. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). Bean, Susanne L. 2001 ESCAP II: Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Matching Error. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 7. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 12). Brown, Lawrence D., M.L.Eaton, David A.Freedman, S.P.Klein, Richard A.Olshen, Kenneth W. Wachter , Martin T.Wells, and Donald Ylvisaker 1999 Statistical controversies in Census 2000. Jurimetrics 39:347–375.

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment Cantwell, Patrick J., David McGrath, Nganha Nguyen, and Mary Frances Zelenak 2001 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Missing Data Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-7. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). Childers, Danny R. 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: The Design Document. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series, Chapter S-DT-01. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 2000, revised January 26, 2001). Childers, Danny R., and Deborah A.Fenstermaker 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Overview of Design. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series, Chapter S-DT-2. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (January). Childers, Danny R., Rosemary L.Byrne, Tamara S.Adams, and Roxanne Feldpausch 2001 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Person Matching and Follow-up Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-6. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). Citro, Constance F. 2000a Advisory committees. Pp. 14–18 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. 2000b Editing and imputation. Pp. 195–197 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J. Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. 2000c Enumeration: Special populations. Pp. 201–206 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Davis, Peter P. 2001 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Dual System Estimation Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-9. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). Dillman, Don, Jon R.Clark, and Michael D.Sinclair 1993 The 1992 simplified questionnaire test: Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design, and request for Social Security numbers on completion rates. Pp. 8–17 in Proceedings of the 1993 Bureau of the Census Annual Research Conference. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. Ericksen, Eugene P., Leobardo F.Estrada, John W.Tukey, and Kirk M.Wolter 1991 Report on the 1990 Decennial Census and the Post-Enumeration Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy 2001a Report: Recommendation Concerning the Methodology to be Used in Producing Tabulations of Population Reported to States and Localities Pursuant to 13 U.S.C. 141(c). U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (March 1). 2001b Analysis Plan for Further ESCAP Deliberations Regarding the Adjustment of Census 2000 Data for Future Uses. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (July 26). 2001c Report of the Executive Steering Committee for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Policy on Adjustment for Non-Redistricting Uses. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 17). Farber, James 2001a Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Consistency of Post-Stratification Variables. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-10. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). 2001b Quality Indicators of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-2. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28).

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment Fay, Robert E. 2001 Evidence of Additional Erroneous Enumerations from the Person Duplication Study. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 9. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (Preliminary version, October 26). Feldpausch, Roxanne 2001 Census Person Duplication and the Corresponding A.C.E. Enumeration Status. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 6. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 13). Fienberg, Stephen E. 2000 Capture-recapture methods. Pp. 49–55 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J. Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Freedman, David A. 1991 Adjusting the 1990 census. Science 252:1233–1236. Freedman, David A., and W.Navidi 1992 Should we have adjusted the U.S. census of 1980? (with discussion). Survey Methodology 18:3–74. Goldfield, Edwin D., and David M.Pemberton 2000 1960 census. Pp. 148–153 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Griffin, Richard 2001 Census 2000: Missing Housing Unit Status and Population Data. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-17. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). Griffin, Richard, and Dawn Haines 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Post-Stratification for Dual System Estimation. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-21. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (January). Haines, Dawn 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Final Post-Stratification Plan for Dual-System Estimation. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-24. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (April). Hogan, Howard 1992 The 1990 Post-Enumeration Survey: an overview. American Statistician 46:261– 269. 1993 The 1990 Post-Enumeration Survey: operations and results. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:1047–1060. 2000a Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Pp. 3–5 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. 2000b Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Theory and Application. Paper prepared for the Second Workshop of the Panel to Review the 2000 Census. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 2). 2001a Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Data and Analysis to Inform the ESCAP Report. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-1. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (March 1). 2001b Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Effect of Excluding “Late Census Adds.” DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-43. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (March 22). Keathley, Don, Anne Kearney, and William Bell 2001 ESCAP II: Analysis of Missing Data Alternatives for the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 12. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 11). Keeley, Charles 1993 Could the Census Bureau Reduce the Undercount by Not Using a “Long Form?” U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment Killion, Ruth Ann 1997 Group Quarters and the Integrated Coverage Measurement Survey. Memorandum for Census 2000 Committee on Statistical Policy. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (August 7). Krejsa, Elizabeth A., and David A.Raglin 2001 ESCAP II: Evaluation Results for Changes in A.C.E. Enumeration Status. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 3. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 15). Love, Susan, and Don Dalzell 2001 Comparison of Record Substitution and 100% Data Allocation. Memorandum for the Record. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (March 27). LUCA Working Group [Joseph Salvo (chair), Shoreh Elhami, Abby Hughes, Terry Jackson, Tim Koss, Harry Wolfe, Patricia Becker (consultant)] 2001 Assessment of the 2000 Census LUCA Program. Report prepared for the Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (April, revised September). Marks, Eli S. 1978 The role of dual system estimation in census evaluation. Chapter 20 in Developments in Dual Systems Estimation of Population Size and Growth, Karol J.Krotki, ed. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press. McMillen, David B. 1998 The census under attack. CHANCE 11(2)(spring):50–55. Miskura, Susan M. 2000a Addressses in the Master Address File (MAF) Excluded from the April 7, 2000 MAF Extract. Census 2000 Informational Memorandum No. 67. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. (August 15). 2000b Results of Reinstatement Rules for the Housing Unit Duplication Operations. Census 2000 Informational Memorandum No. 82. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (November 21). Miskura, Susan M., Robert W.Marx, Charlene A.Leggieri, Charles H.Alexander, Jr., and A.Edward Pike III 2001 2010 Census Planning: Opportunities to Meet the Challenges. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Atlanta. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (August). Mule, Thomas 2001 ESCAP II: Person Duplication in Census 2000. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 20. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 11). Mulry, Mary, and Bruce D.Spencer 2001 Overview of Total Error Modeling and Loss Function Analysis. Prepared for U.S. Census Bureau. Abt Associates, Inc., Washington, D.C. (February 28). Nash, Fay F. 2000 Overview of the Duplicate Housing Unit Operations. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (November 7). 2001 ESCAP II: Analysis of Census Imputations. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 21. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (September 24). National Research Council 1978 Counting the People in 1980: An Appraisal of Census Plans. Panel on Decennial Census Plans, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1985 The Bicentennial Census: New Directions for Methodology in 1990. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology, Constance F.Citro and Michael L.Cohen, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment 1994 Counting People in an Information Age. Panel to Evaluate Alternative Census Methodologies, Norman Bradburn and Duane Steffey, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1995 Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Census Requirements in the Year 2000 and Beyond, Barry Edmonston and Charles Schultze, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1999a Letter from Janet L.Norwood to Kenneth Prewitt, Director, U.S. Census Bureau. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics, Washington, D.C. (May). 1999b Measuring a Changing Nation: Modern Methods for the 2000 Census. Panel on Alternative Census Methodologies, Michael L.Cohen, Andrew A.White, and Keith F. Rust, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2000a Designing the 2010 Census. First Interim Report. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Michael L.Cohen and Benjamin F.King, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2000b Letter from Janet L.Norwood to Kenneth Prewitt, Director, U.S. Census Bureau. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics, Washington, D.C. (November). 2000c Small-Area Income and Poverty Estimates—Priorities for 2000 and Beyond. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, Constance F.Citro and Graham Kalton, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2001a Proceedings, First Workshop of Panel to Review the 2000 Census (October 6, 1999). Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2001b Proceedings, Second Workshop of Panel to Review the 2000 Census (February 2–3, 2000). Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2001c Proceedings, Third Workshop of Panel to Review the 2000 Census (October 2, 2000). Committee on National Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Navarro, Alfredo, and Douglas Olson 2001 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Effect of Targeted Extended Search. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-18. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). Owens, Karen L. 2000 Census 2000 Address List Review. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Indianapolis. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (August). Passel, Jeffrey S. 2001 Comparison of Demographic Analysis, A.C.E., and Census 2000 Results by Race. Memorandum prepared for the U.S. Census Monitoring Board, Presidential Members. Urban Institute, Washington, D.C. (February 27). Prewitt, Kenneth 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Statement on the Feasibility of Using Statistical Methods to Improve the Accuracy of Census 2000. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. (June). Raglin, David A. 2001 ESCAP II: Effect of Excluding Reinstated Census People from the A.C.E. Person Process. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 13. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 9). Raglin, David A., and Elizabeth A.Krejsa 2001 ESCAP II: Evaluation for Results for Changes in Mover and Residence Status in the A.C.E. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 16. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 15) .

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment Robinson, J.Gregory 1991 Robustness of the Estimates of the Population Aged 65 and Over. Preliminary Research and Evaluation Memorandum No. 79. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 2001a Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Demographic Analysis Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-4. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). 2001b ESCAP II: Demographic Analysis Results. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 1. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 13). Salvo, Joseph J. 2000 Data capture. Pp. 105–108 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Salvo, Joseph J., and A.Peter Lobo 1998 The American Community Survey: Nonresponse follow-up in the Rockland County Test Site. Paper prepared for the American Community Survey Symposium. Population Division, Department of City Planning, New York, N.Y. (March). Schindler, Eric 2001 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) Survey—Census Imputations by Post-stratum. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-64. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. (July 17). Siegel, Paul M. 1993 The Impact of Content on Census Coverage. Memorandum. Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. Starsinic, Michael D., Charles D.Stissel, and Mark E.Asiala 2001 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Variance Estimates by Size of Geographic Area. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-11. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (February 28). Steffey, Duane L. 1997 A Review of the Census Undercount Issue. Faculty Fellows Program, Center for California Studies, California State University. Thompson, John H. 1992 CAPE Processing Results. Memorandum. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 2000 Organization and administration of the census. Pp. 295–299 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Thompson, John H., Preston J.Waite, and Robert E.Fay 2001 Basis of “Revised Early Approximation” of Undercounts Released Oct. 17, 2001. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 9a. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 26). Treat, James B. 1993 1993 National Census Test Appeals and Long-Form Experiment, Long-Form Component. Final Report. Census Data Quality Branch, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. U.S. Census Bureau 1992a Assessment of Accuracy of Adjusted Versus Unadjusted 1990 Census Base for Use in Intercensal Estimates: Recommendation. Report of the Committee on Adjustment of Postcensal Estimates. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 1992b 1990 Census of Population, General Population Characteristics. 1990 CP-1–1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. 1993 1990 Census of Population and Housing—History, Part A. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. 1994 Nonresponse Followup Reinterview. 1990 Census of Population and Housing Evaluation and Research Reports: Effectiveness of Quality Assurance. Washington, D.C. (February).

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment 1996 Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. 1999 Census 2000 Operational Plan Using Traditional Census-Taking Methods. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. 2000 The Census 2000 Evaluation Program. Planning, Research, and Evaluation Division. Washington, D.C. (February 4). U.S. Census Monitoring Board Congressional Members 2001 A Guide to Statistical Adjustment: How It Really Works. Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. (May 23, 2001). U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members 2001a Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. (April). 2001b Final Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. (September). U.S. General Accounting Office 1992 Decennial Census: 1990 Results Show Need for Fundamental Reform. GAO/GGD-92–94. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2000a 2000 Census—New Data Capture System Progress and Risks. GAO/AIMD-00–61. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. (February). 2000b 2000 Census—Status of Nonresponse Follow-up and Key Operations. GAO/T-GGD/ AIMD-00–164. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. (May 11). Waite, Preston J., Sally M.Obenski, and Lisa E.Buckley 2001 2010 Census Planning: The Strategy. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Atlanta. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (August). Warren, Robert 2001 New Census Data and INS Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population. INS Release. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Washington, D.C. West, Kirsten K., and J.Gregory Robinson 2001 The Use of Demographic Benchmarks to Ensure Census Data Quality. Paper prepared for the International Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Stockholm. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. (May). Wetrogan, Signe I., and Arthur R.Cresce 2001 ESCAP II: Characteristics of Census Imputations. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report 22. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. (October 12). Word, David L. 1997 Who Responds/Who Doesn’t?: Analyzing Variation in Mail Response Rates During the 1990 Census. Population Division Working Paper No. 19. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. Wright, Tommy 2000 Sampling for follow-up of nonresponding households. Pp. 325–327 in Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, Margo J.Anderson, editor-in-chief. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

OCR for page 215
The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment This page in the original is blank.