National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals (2002)

Chapter: 10 Conclusions and Recommendations

« Previous: 9 Sulfur Dioxide
Suggested Citation:"10 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 2002. Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10242.
×

10
Conclusions and Recommendations

After reviewing the available data on ammonia, carbon monoxide, chlorine, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide, the subcommittee concludes that the Navy’s proposed SEALs would be protective of the health of personnel in a disabled submarine with the exception of the SEALs for chlorine. In addition, the subcommittee concludes that the SEALs for the gases except chlorine could be set at levels higher than the Navy’s proposed levels and still be protective of the health of crew members in a disabled submarine; eye or respiratory-tract irritation or central-nervous-system effects would not be intolerable or impair performance of specific tasks, including the ability to escape. A comparison of the subcommittee’s recommended SEALs with the Navy’s proposed SEALs is presented in Table 10–1. In addition to the research needs identified for each gas in Chapters 29, the subcommittee also has several additional recommendations that are presented in this chapter.

The subcommittee recommends that additional research be conducted on the health effects of mixtures of the irritant gases—ammonia, chlorine, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide. The subcommittee also recommends additional studies be conducted on the combined effects of hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen sulfide.

As described in Chapter 1, the Navy has developed instructions for the management of toxic gases in disabled submarines. Those instructions use a Cumulative Exposure Index (CEI) approach, which assumes that the effects of

Suggested Citation:"10 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 2002. Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10242.
×

TABLE 10–1 Comparison of the Navy’s Proposed SEALs with the Subcommittee’s Recommended SEALs

 

Navy’s Proposed SEALs (ppm)a

Subcommittee’s Recommended SEALs (ppm)b

Gas

SEAL 1

SEAL 2

SEAL 1

SEAL 2

Ammonia

25

75

75

125

Carbon monoxide

75

85

125

150

Chlorine

2

5

1

2.5

Hydrogen chloride

2.5

25

20

35

Hydrogen cyanide

1

4.5

10

15

Hydrogen sulfide

10

20

15

30

Nitrogen dioxide

0.5

1

5

10

Sulfur dioxide

3

6

20

30

aU.S. Navy (1998)

bThe Subcommittee’s recommended SEALs are for an atmospheric pressure of 1 at 25°C. Values obtained for the gases using Dräeger tubes or other measurement devices in a disabled submarine might need to be corrected to an atmospheric pressure of 1 and 25°C.

exposure to the irritant gases—ammonia, chlorine, hydrogen chloride, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide—are additive and not synergistic. The subcommittee believes that hydrogen sulfide should be considered an irritant gas and added to the CEI. The subcommittee also believes that a separate CEI should be established for carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide because the effects of exposure to these gases maybe additive as well. If the results of research conducted on the health effects from exposures to mixtures of gases show that the effects are not additive, then the CEI approach will have to be modified accordingly.

The effects of environmental conditions (e.g., humidity, temperature, and pressure) found on a disabled submarine on the toxicity of the gases should be studied. Also, because fires on a disabled submarine will generate participate matter, research should be conducted on the effects of particles on the toxicity of the gases.

Suggested Citation:"10 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 2002. Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10242.
×

As noted in Chapter 1, the Navy instructs crew members wearing EABs to remove them each hour, as concentrations of some of the gases should decrease overtime because of contact with the wet surfaces likely to be found in a disabled submarine. That same logic leads the subcommittee to recommend that the concentrations of all gases be determined as frequently as possible.

The subcommittee emphasizes that its recommended SEALs are for normal atmospheric conditions (an atmospheric pressure of 1 and a temperature of 25°C). Values obtained for gas concentrations using Dräeger tubes in a disabled submarine might need to be corrected to an atmospheric pressure of 1 and 25°C. The subcommittee did not find information on the effects of hyperbaric conditions on Dräeger-tube measurements and recommends that research be conducted to determine the effect of increased pressure on Dräeger-tube measurements.

Currently, Dräeger tubes are the only means available on submarines for measuring gas concentrations once the spectrophotometers stop functioning because of power loss. Dräeger tubes have an error rate of about 30% (i.e., the indicated value maybe 30% lower or higher than the actual gas concentration), and a new tube is required for each measurement of an individual gas. The subcommittee recommends that the Navy place high priority on developing a battery-operated instrument for use in submarines to more accurately measure the gases and allow for frequent measurement of the gases in disabled submarines.

REFERENCES

U.S. Navy. 1998. Memorandum from N.A. Carlson, Acting Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory to Officer in Charge, Naval Medical Research Institute Toxicity Detachment. Subject: The Management of Toxic Gases in a Disabled Submarine. March 2, 1998.

Suggested Citation:"10 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 2002. Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10242.
×
Page 288
Suggested Citation:"10 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 2002. Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10242.
×
Page 289
Suggested Citation:"10 Conclusions and Recommendations." National Research Council. 2002. Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10242.
×
Page 290
Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals Get This Book
×
 Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals
Buy Paperback | $75.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

On-board fires can occur on submarines after events such as collision or explosion. These fires expose crew members to toxic concentrations of combustion products such as ammonia, carbon monoxide, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen sulfide. Exposure to these substances at high concentrations may cause toxic effects to the respiratory and central nervous system; leading possible to death. T protect crew members on disabled submarines, scientists at the U.S. Navy Health Research Center's Toxicology Detachment have proposed two exposure levels, called submarine escape action level (SEAL) 1 and SEAL 2, for each substance. SEAL 1 is the maximum concentration of a gas in a disabled submarine below which healthy submariners can be exposed for up to 10 days without encountering irreversible health effects while SEAL 2 the maximum concentration of a gas in below which healthy submariners can be exposed for up to 24 hours without experiencing irreversible health effects. SEAL 1 and SEAL 2 will not impair the functions of the respiratory system and central nervous system to the extent of impairing the ability of crew members in a disabled submarine to escape, be rescued, or perform specific tasks.

Hoping to better protect the safety of submariners, the chief of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery requested that the National Research Council (NRC) review the available toxicologic and epidemiologic data on eight gases that are likely to be produced in a disabled submarine and to evaluate independently the scientific validity of the Navy's proposed SEALs for those gases. The NRC assigned the task to the Committee on Toxicology's (COT's) Subcommittee on Submarine Escape Action Levels. The specific task of the subcommittee was to review the toxicologic, epidemiologic, and related data on ammonia, carbon monoxide, chlorine, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide in order to validate the Navy's proposed SEALs. The subcommittee also considered the implications of exposures at hyperbaric conditions and potential interactions between the eight gases.

Review of Submarine Escape Action Levels for Selected Chemicals presents the subcommittee's findings after evaluation human data from experimental, occupational, and epidemiologic studies; data from accident reports; and experimental-animal data. The evaluations focused primarily on high-concentration inhalation exposure studies. The subcommittee's recommended SEALs are based solely on scientific data relevant to health effects. The report includes the recommendations for each gas as determined by the subcommittee as well as the Navy's original instructions for these substances.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!