 |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 3
During 2001, a severe drought occurred in the Klamath River Basin. The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) determined that the newly issued biological opinions and their RPAs must prevail;
thus, water that would have gone to irrigators was directed almost entirely to attempts to maintain minimum lake levels and minimum flows as prescribed in the two RPAs. The severe economic
consequences of this change in water management led DOI to request that the National Research Council (NRC) independently review the scientific and technical validity of the government's
biological opinions and their RPAs. The NRC Committee on Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin was formed in response to this request. The committee was charged with
filing an interim report after approximately less than 3 months of study and a final report after about 18 months of study (see statement of task, Appendix). The
interim report, which is summarized here, focuses on the biological assessments of the USBR (2001) and the USFWS and NMFS biological opinions of 2001 regarding the effects of Klamath Project
operations on the three listed fish species. The committee conducted a preliminary assessment of the scientific information used by the agencies and other relevant scientific information,
and has considered the degree to which the biological opinions are supported by this information. During November and early December 2001, the committee studied written documentation, heard
briefings from experts, and received oral and written testimony from the public, and used this information as the basis for its interim report.
THE COMMITTEE'S PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
The NRC committee concludes that all components of the biological opinion issued by the USFWS on the endangered suckers have substantial scientific support except for the recommendations
concerning minimum water levels for Upper Klamath Lake. A substantial data-collection and analytical effort by multiple agencies, tribes, and other parties has not shown a clear
connection between water level in Upper Klamath Lake and conditions that are adverse to the welfare of the suckers. Incidents of adult mortality (fish kills), for example, have not been
associated with years of low water level. Also, extremes of chemical conditions considered threatening to the welfare of the fish have not coincided with years of low water level, and the
highest recorded recruitment of new individuals into the adult populations occurred through reproduction in a year of low water level. Thus, the committee concludes that there is
presently no sound scientific basis for recommending an operating regime for the Klamath Project that seeks to ensure lake levels
|
|
|