Because vaccines are given to healthy children to protect others in addition to themselves, it is important to understand fully the possible risks of serious adverse consequences of vaccines. Therefore, the committee recommends continued attention in the form of policy analysis, research, and communication strategy development. However, the committee does not recommend a review by national and federal vaccine-related advisory bodies of the licensure or schedule of administration of the vaccines administered to infants in the United States on the basis of concerns about immune dysfunction. See Box ES-1 for a summary of all conclusions and recommendations.
Immunization to protect infants and children from vaccine-preventable diseases is one of the greatest achievements of public health. Immunization is not without risks, however. It is well established, for example, that the oral polio vaccine can on rare occasion cause paralytic polio.
The Immunization Safety Review Committee was established by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to evaluate the available evidence on a series of immunization safety concerns. While all of the committee members share the view that immunization is generally beneficial, none of them has a vested interest in the specific immunization safety issues that come before the group.
For each hypothesis to be examined, the committee assesses both the scientific evidence and the significance of the issue for society.
The scientific assessment has two components: an examination of the epidemiological and clinical evidence regarding a possible causal relationship between the immunization and the adverse event, and an examination of experimental evidence for any biological mechanism(s) relevant to the hypothesis.
The significance assessment addresses such considerations as the burden of the health risks associated with the vaccine-preventable disease and with the adverse event in question, as well as the level of public concern about the safety issue.
In this report, the committee examines the hypothesis that receipt of multiple immunizations adversely affects the developing immune system.
The examination of experimental evidence for biological mechanisms has been referred to in previous reports of this committee (IOM, 2001a, 2001b) and others (IOM, 1991, 1994) as an assessment of “biological plausibility.” The committee has noted, however, that the term is a source of confusion on at least two fronts. First, it is associated with a particular set of guidelines (sometimes referred to as the Bradford Hill criteria) for causal inference from epidemiological evidence; and second, readers sometimes regard the term with a degree of certainty or precision the committee never intended. For example, a relationship