 |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 2
presented by such a system, with the goal of fostering a broad,
deliberate, and sophisticated discussion among policy makers and
stakeholders about whether such a system is desirable or feasible.
Policy questions that the committee believes should be considered when
contemplating any kind of identity system include the following:
-
What is the purpose of the system? Possibilities
range from expediting and/or tracking travel to prospectively
monitoring individuals' activities in order to identify
and look for suspicious activity to retrospectively
identifying perpetrators of crimes.
-
What is the scope of the population that would be
issued an “ID” and, presumably, be recorded in
the system? How would the identities of these individuals be
authenticated?
What is the scope of the data that would be gathered
about individuals participating in the system and correlated
with their national identity? While colloquially it is referred
to as an “identification system,” implying that all
the system would do is identify individuals, many proposals talk
about the ID as a key to a much larger collection of data. Would
these data be identity data only (and what is meant by identity
data)? Or would other data be collected, stored, and/or analyzed
as well? With what confidence would the accuracy and quality of
this data be established and subsequently determined?
Who would be the user(s) of the system (as opposed to
those who would participate in the system by having an ID)? One
assumption seems to be that the public sector/government will be
the primary user, but what parts of the government, in what
contexts, and with what constraints? In what setting(s) in the
public sphere would such a system be used? Would state and local
governments have access to the system? Would the private sector
be allowed to use the system? What entities within the
government or private sector would be allowed to use the system?
Who could contribute, view, and/or edit data in the system?
What types of use would be allowed? Who would be able
to ask for an ID, and under what circumstances? Assuming that
there are datasets associated with an individual's identity,
what types of queries would be permitted (e.g., “Is this
person allowed to travel?” “Does this person have a
criminal record?”)? Beyond simple queries, would analysis
and data mining of the information collected be permitted? If
so, who would be allowed to do such analysis and for what
purpose(s)?
Would participation in and/or identification by the system be
voluntary or mandatory? In addition, would participants
have to be aware of or consent to having their IDs checked (as
opposed to, for example, allowing surreptitious facial
recognition)?
|
|
|