National Academies Press: OpenBook
Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

SPECIAL REPORT 268

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

A LONG-TERM STRATEGY

Surface Transportation Environmental Cooperative Research Program Advisory Board

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Transportation Research Board

Washington, D.C.

2002
www.TRB.org

Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

Transportation Research Board Special Report 268

Subscriber Category

I planning, administration, and environment

Transportation Research Board publications are available by ordering individual publications directly from the TRB Business Office, through the Internet at www.TRB.org or national-academies.org/trb, or by annual subscription through organizational or individual affiliation with TRB. Affiliates and library subscribers are eligible for sub stantial discounts. For further information, contact the

Transportation Research Board Business Office,

500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001 (telephone 202-334-3213; fax: ; or e-mail TRBsales@nas.edu).

Copyright 2002 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America.

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance.

This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to the procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.

The study was sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Surface transportation environmental research : a long-term strategy / Surface Transportation Environmental Cooperative Research Program Advisory Board, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.

p. cm.—(Special report ; 268)

Includes bibliographical references.

ISBN 0-309-07702-8

1. Transportation—Environmental aspects—United States. 2. Transportation—Environmental aspects—Research—United States. I. National Research Council (U.S.). Surface Transportation Environmental Cooperative Research Program Advisory Board. II. Special report (National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board) ; 268.

TD195.T7 S93 2002

363.73'1—dc21

2002072442

Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine


The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.


The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.


The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.


The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both the Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.


The Transportation Research Board is a division of the National Research Council, which serves the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. The Board’s mission is to promote innovation and progress in transportation by stimulating and conducting research, facilitating the dissemination of information, and encouraging the implementation of research results. The Board’s varied activities annually engage more than 4,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation. www.TRB.org

www.national-academies.org

Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

This page intially left blank

Page v
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ADVISORY BOARD

Elizabeth Deakin, Chair,

University of California at Berkeley

F. Kaid Benfield,

Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, D.C.

Kenneth J. Button,

George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Judith M. Espinosa,

The Alliance for Transportation Research, Albuquerque, New Mexico

Richard T.T. Forman,

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Fred Hansen,

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, Portland

Edwin E. Herricks,

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Wayne W. Kober,

Wayne W. Kober, Inc., Dillsburg, Pennsylvania

Alan J. Krupnick,

Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

Martin Lee-Gosselin,

Laval University, Quebec, Canada

Ysela Llort,

Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee

C. Ian MacGillivray,

Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames

Jane T. Nishida,

Maryland Department of the Environment, Baltimore

John P. Poorman,

Capital District Transportation Committee, Albany, New York

Catherine L. Ross,

Georgia Regional Transportation Authority, Atlanta

Daniel Sperling,

University of California at Davis

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD STAFF

Kris A. Hoellen, Study Director

Page vi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

This page intially left blank

Page vii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

PREFACE

In 1998, as part of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), Congress called for the establishment of an advisory board to recommend a national agenda for environmental research in the domain of surface transportation.1 Section 5107(c)(1) of TEA-21 states:

In consultation with the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, the Secretary shall establish an advisory board to recommend environmental and energy conservation research, technology, and technology transfer activities related to surface transportation.

To respond to this legislative mandate, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) contracted with the Transportation Research Board (TRB) to create the Surface Transportation Environmental Cooperative Research Program Advisory Board (Advisory Board).2 The National Research Council appointed the board members, who collectively have expertise in state and metropolitan transportation planning and policy, travel behavior, transit and highway systems, vehicles and fuels, land use, roadside ecology, air and water quality, facility planning and design, management and organization, and decision making and community participation. The board members also represent a broad spectrum of the transportation and environmental communities,

1

The term “environmental” as used here encompasses energy conservation.

2

In keeping with the language of the congressional directive to the Department of Transportation to establish an “Advisory Board” to advise the agency on environmental and energy conservation research, the ad hoc study committee appointed to carry out this study is referred to in this report as the “Advisory Board.” This terminology is different from the normal use of the term “Board” in the National Academies to refer to standing units that have administrative and program oversight responsibilities.

Page viii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

including academia, state departments of transportation, state environmental protection agencies, metropolitan planning organizations, transit organizations, environmental groups, and industry.

The Advisory Board was formally charged with recommending a national agenda of energy and environmental research for the surface transportation community. During the board’s first meeting, it became apparent that planning processes and methods would have to be a major focus of the board’s work. The Advisory Board therefore agreed to amend its charge to develop a national agenda for environmental and planning research related to surface transportation.

For purposes of this report, surface transportation encompasses only land-based modes of transportation, thereby excluding water-related travel and all associated environmental impacts. Moreover, the Advisory Board followed the lead of the U.S. Congress in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 and TEA-21 in using the term surface transportation to refer to the motor vehicle–highway system and public transit systems, along with pedestrian and bicycle facilities and their use. However, many of the board’s findings and recommendations encompass, or could be extended to, other modes and facilities, such as railroads, canals and waterways, and airports. Taken literally, the term surface transportation would encompass all modes, since all modes use the earth’s surface for all or a significant portion of the time. However, surface transportation has become a term of art in the United States during the past decade and is widely understood as used by Congress and the Advisory Board.

During the course of a 2-year period, the Advisory Board held six meetings at which members identified and prioritized research areas. At several of these meetings, the board heard testimony from representatives of federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Office of the Secretary, FHWA, and the Federal Transit Administration, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy. The board also convened a workshop on research priorities, inviting a broad range of experts from the transportation and environment communities to provide their ideas and advice on the highest research priorities. A summary of the workshop findings is contained in Appendix A.

The Advisory Board wishes to acknowledge the contributions of many individuals and organizations to the development of this report. Kris A. Hoellen managed the study and drafted sections of the report under the guidance of

Page ix
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

the Advisory Board and the supervision of Stephen R. Godwin, Director of TRB’s Studies and Information Services Division. Cynthia Burbank, Jill Hochman, and Debra Elston served as liaisons and project sponsors from FHWA; all three provided background materials and valuable insights to the Advisory Board.

The board also expresses appreciation to the following individuals for briefing its members on the activities of their respective organizations: John Horsley, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials; Donald Chen, Surface Transportation Policy Project; Alexander Cristofaro, Environmental Protection Agency; and Thomas Gross, Department of Energy.

In addition, the Advisory Board wishes to express gratitude to all those who participated in the workshop on research priorities and to those who took the time to provide written responses to questions posed by the board. Input received during the workshop was invaluable to the board in formulating its research recommendations.

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

The Advisory Board thanks the following individuals for their review of this report: David G. Burwell, Surface Transportation Policy Project; Aaron Cohen, Health Effects Institute; Robert T. Dunphy, The Urban Land Institute; Gary L. Evink, Florida Department of Transportation (retired); David L. Greene, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Susan Handy, University of Texas at Austin; Susan Hanson, Clark University; Michael D. Meyer, Georgia Institute of Technology; William W. Millar, American Public Transportation Association; and Neil J. Pedersen, Maryland Department of Transportation. Although these reviewers provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the Advisory Board’s findings and conclusions, nor did they see the final draft of this report before its release. Special appreciation is expressed to Michael D. Meyer, who re-reviewed two chapters of this report.

The review of this report was overseen by Lester A. Hoel, University of Virginia. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for

Page x
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×

making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Suzanne Schneider, Associate Executive Director of TRB, managed the report review process. The report was edited and prepared for publication under the supervision of Nancy Ackerman, Director of Reports and Editorial Services. Rona Briere edited the report. Special thanks go to Frances Holland for assistance with meeting arrangements and to Alisa Decatur for production of the final report.

Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R2
Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R3
Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R4
Page v
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R5
Page vi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R6
Page vii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R7
Page viii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R8
Page ix
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R9
Page x
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R10
Page xi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R11
Page xii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Transportation Research Board. 2002. Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10354.
×
Page R12
Next: Executive Summary »
Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy -- Special Report 268 Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB Special Report 268 - Surface Transportation Environmental Research: A Long-Term Strategy defines a broad and ambitious research program to address and inform major public policy debates about the effects of surface transportation facilities and operations on the human and natural environments. The committee that conducted the study identified major gaps in knowledge that could be filled through a cooperative program of research involving federal agencies, states, and environmental organizations. The committee recommended creation of a new cooperative research program to carry out its recommended research agenda. Special Report 268 Summary

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!