National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$49.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs (2002)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "Conceptual Issues in the Measurement of Work Disability." The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
201
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs

FIGURE 4 Relationship of disablement process to quality of life.

“work disability” or other restrictions to social participation. Close inspection of the definitions given above suggests that a number of steps can be identified in the pathway between the health condition and the social consequences described as work disability. At a micro level there are the pathological changes in the body and impairment in the structure and functioning of organs and body systems. There may be an impact on the activity of the person, ranging from simple movements, to basic activities of daily living, to instrumental activities of daily living, and so on. These can then contribute to the performance of more complex social roles, and ultimately, the person’s participation in all aspects of society can be adversely affected. Work is one such social role.

Both the Nagi and the ICIDH models cover the spectrum of the consequences of health conditions. As indicated earlier, as well as terminology, a major difference is where these models place the boundaries between the different concepts (see Figure 3). In the Nagi model the performance of all activities, except for basic actions or functions of the body, is subsumed into the overall category of disability (Nagi, 1976). In the ICIDH model the concept of activity includes these basic actions as well as ADLs, IADLs, and some other role activities (with the emphasis very much on activity) (WHO, 1980, 1997; Badley, 1993). Participation is reserved to highlight the way in which the performance of activities may be constrained by more than the immediate context of the activity. The juxtaposition of the two models in this way illuminates some nuances in the ways

Page
201