National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$49.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs (2002)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "SSA's Disability Determination of Mental Impairments: A Review Toward an Agenda for Research." The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
279
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs

In summary, the evaluation of claims for disability benefits is a complex and difficult task. This task is also a small component of the many extrinsic factors that have bearing on the shape of the disability program, such as long- and short-range economic factors, the changing characteristics of the general population and labor force, and the general priority and ideology held regarding people with disabilities. This paper has limited its focus to the medical review of claims for disability benefits based on mental conditions and has been informed by the APA’s evaluation of SSA’s standards and guidelines used in disability determination. With the recent revision of WHO’s ICF and the development of related disability assessment and research instruments, a new and valuable resource has become available for use in modifications of the tools used in sequential evaluation.

Building on the research database provided by the APA study, the development of the ICF as a conceptual model, and on a classification system of disablement and functioning and its related instruments, it is possible to suggest recommendations for a research-based agenda to refine sequential evaluation and the standards and guidelines that implement disability determination for claims based on both mental and physical conditions. This is made possible because basic work requirements are consistent across disorder types. Each of the recommendations that have been made is intended to be a component of an explicit research plan developed by an interagency working group.

Finally, it is important to note that all recommendations are made within the context of the SSA’s definition of disability. There are no indications that any change to the statutory definition should be considered.

REFERENCES

Americans with Disabilities Act. 1990. Public Law 101–336.

American Psychiatric Association. 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd Ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.


Pincus HA, Kennedy C, Simmens SJ, Goldman HH, Sirovatka P, Sharfstein S. 1991. Determining disability due to mental impairment: APA’s evaluation of Social Security Administration guidelines. American Journal of Psychiatry 148(8):1037–1043.

Pope AM, Tarlov AR. 1991. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Social Security Act. as in effect January 2001.

Social Security Administration. 2001. Disability Evaluation under Social Security. Listing of Impairments Adult [Online]. Available: http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/AdultListings.htm [accessed September 24, 2001].

Social Security Administration Regulations. 20 CFR Ch.III 404.1520 [Online]. Available: http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/404/404-0000.htm [accessed September 24, 2001].

Social Security Administration Regulations. 20 CFR Ch.III 404.1520a [Online]. Available: http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/404/404-0000.htm [accessed September 24, 2001].

Page
279