National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$49.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs (2002)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "Survey Design Options for the Measurement of Persons with Work Disabilities." The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
302
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs

REFERENCES

Altman B. 2001. Definitions of disability, and their operationalization, and measurement in survey data: An Update. Research in Social Science and Disability 2:77–100.


Bixby L. 1976. Retirement patterns in the United States: Research and policy interaction. Social Security Bulletin 3–19.

Bound J, Waidmann T. 2000. Accounting for Recent Declines in Employment Rates Among the Working-Age Disabled. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.

Bye B, Schechter E. 1982. 1978 Survey of Disability and Work. SSA Publication No. 13-11745. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.


Haber L. 1973. Social planning for disability. Journal of Human Resources (February):33–55.


Jette A, Badley E. 2000. Conceptual issues in the measurement of work disability. In: Mathiowetz N, Wunderlich GS, eds. Survey Measurement of Work Disability: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Mathiowetz N. 2000. Methodological issues in the measurement of work disability. In: Mathiowetz N, Wunderlich GS, eds. Survey Measurement of Work Disability: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Mathiowetz N, Lair T. 1994. Getting better? Change or error in the measurement of functional limitations. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 20:237–262.

Mathiowetz N, Wunderlich G, eds. 2000. Survey Measurement of Work Disability: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

McNeil J. 1993. Census Bureau Data on Persons with Disabilities: New Results and Old Questions about Validity and Reliability. Paper presented at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the Society for Disability Studies, Seattle, Washington, 1993.


Nagi S. 1991. Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In: Pope A, Tarlov A, eds. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Rodgers W, Miller B. 1997. A comparative analysis of ADL questions in surveys of older people. Journal of Gerontology 52B:21-36.


Sheppard H. 1977. Factors associated with early withdrawal from the labor force. In: Wolbein SL, ed. Men in the Pre-Retirement Years. Philadelphia: Temple University. Pp. 163–215.


World Health Organization. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.


Yelin EH, Nevitt MC, Epstein WV. 1980. Toward an epidemiology of work disability. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 58(3):384-415.

Page
302