| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 32
STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF SOVIET SOCIAL SCIENCE:
THE CHALLENGE FOR THE
AMERICAN SCHOLARLY COMMUNITY
August 24-25, 1989
National Academy of Sciences
2101 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC
AGENDA
THURSDAY; AUGUST 24
The emphasis this day is on: (1) providing and sharing information, (2)
encouraging communication among participants, and (3) giving participants
an opportunity to discuss issues of interest to them.
~M.—Plenary Sessions
8:15 Registration open
8:30 Coffee, continental breakfast
9:00 Welcome—Suzanne Woolsey, Executive Director, CBASSE
9:15 Plenary Session I: Background for Our Discussions
"The History and Development of Soviet Social Science"
Blair Ruble. Secretary, The Kennan Institute for Advanced
Russian Studies
"The History and Development of U.S.-Soviet Scholarly Ex-
changes"
Allen Kassof, Executive Director, International Research and
Exchanges Board (IREX)
10:45 Break
11:00 Panel I: Social Science in the Soviet Union—Current Conditions
and [lends
Panel participants will be asked to address: (1) current direc-
tions of change, including where one finds Soviets interested
in contacts with U.S scholars; (2) strengths, weaknesses, needs
within Soviet social and behavioral sciences; (3) U.S.-Soviet
contacts in the behavioral and social sciences in particular
fields; and (4) implications for American social science and
scholarship.
Participants:
Paul Goble, U.S. Department of State
32
OCR for page 33
Ed ~ Hewett, The Brookings Institution
Michael Swafford, Paragon Research International
12:30 Lunch
P.M. Working Groups
Each session will have a rapporteur, who will report back on the
second day so that a collective picture can be developed for the
entire group.
2:00 Working Groups
#2a Joint U.S.~oviet scholarly projects
Chair: Alexander Rabinowitch, Indiana University
Rapporteur: Jo Husbands
#3a U.S.~oviet research collaboration
Chair: Philip Converse, Institute for Advanced Study in
the Behavioral Sciences
~4
Rapporteur: Philip Stewart, Ohio State University
Logistical issues in Soviet-American scholarly work
Chair: Richard Ericson, Columbia University
Rapporteur: Marianna lax Choldin, University of Illinois
#5 Intellectual opportunities for American scholars
Chair: Roberta Miller, National Science Foundation
Rapporteur: Barbara Anderson, University of Michigan
3:30 Break
4:00 Working Groups
#1 Projects to improve social and behavioral science capabilities
in the U.S.S.R.
Chair: John Adams, University of Minnesota
Rapporteur: Marjorie Balzer, Georgetown University
#2b Joint U.S.~oviet scholarly projects
Chair: Jane Wales, W. Alton Jones Foundation
Rapporteur: William Zimmerman, University of Michigan
#3b U.S.~oviet research collaboration
Chair: Joseph Kadane, Carnegie Mellon University
Rapporteur: Allen Lynch, Harriman Institute, Columbia
University
#6 Development of behavioral science in the U.S.S.R.
Chair: Norris Minick, Northwestern University
Rapporteur: David Johnson, Federation of Cognitive, Be-
havioral, and Psychological Sciences
5:30 Adjourn—reception follows in the Members' Room
33
OCR for page 34
FRIDAY AUGUST 25
If Day 1 provides information, Day 2 addresses implications What
do these changes and opportunities mean for the U.S. social science com-
munity? How can the community best be responsive to what is happening
in the U.S.S.R? What are key issues and problems? How much commu-
nication, coordination, planning is possible, feasible, and desirable?
8:30 Coffee, continental breakfast
9:00 Plenary Session II: Reports from the Working Groups
Each rapporteur will summarize the results of the discussion in
his or her group, followed by questions and general discussion.
10:45 Break
11:00 Panel II: The American Response Ideas and Prospects
The panelists will be invited to draw on the meeting's discussion
to suggest ideas for what should be done (projects, programs,
organizational changes, funding, etc.) so that the U.S. social
science community can respond effectively to the new opportu-
nities in the Soviet Union.
Participants:
Herbert Simon, Carnegie Mellon University
Enid C.B. Schoettle, Ford Foundation
Herbert Levine, University of Pennsylvania
William ~ James, U.S. Information Agency
1:00 Lunch
2:00 Adjourn, followed by visit to the Kennan Institute
34
Representative terms from entire chapter:
scholarly projects