|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. storage of spent fuel or high-level radioactive waste, which has been pending for many years (North, 1999). ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis work has benefited from the contributions of Drs. Mark Turnquist and Tsung-sheng Chang. The support of the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. REFERENCESChang, T., L. Nozick, and M. Turnquist. 2001a. Routing hazardous materials with stochastic dynamic facility attributes. Working paper, Cornell University. Chang, T., L. Nozick, and M. Turnquist. 2001b. Routing hazardous materials with stochastic dynamic facility attributes: A case study. Working paper, Cornell University. Hammitt, J., E. S. Belsky, J. I. Levy, and J. D. Graham. 1999. Residential building codes, affordability, and health protection: A risk-trade-off approach. Risk Analysis 9(6):1037–1059. Lowrance, L. 1976. Of Acceptable Risk. Los Altos, Calif.: William Kaufman. North, D. W. 1999. A perspective on nuclear waste. Risk Analysis 19(4):751–758. Slovic, P. 1999. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis 19(4):689–701. Tengs, T. O., M. E. Adams, J. S. Pliskin, D. G. Safran, J. E. Siegel, M. Weinstein, and J. D. Graham. 1995. Five hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Analysis 15(3):369–390.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
