Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 35
Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization, Part 2 Summary of the Austin Workshop CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance Strategies for future financing for immunization cannot depend solely on increases in federal funding. Instead, everyone concerned about immunization should consider how to make the best use of all available resources, whether by cutting some activities, identifying previously untapped resources, or rethinking the set of relationships involved in supporting immunization activities. Diane Simpson, acting deputy director of the National Immunization Program at CDC, reviewed key elements of three broad strategies being pursued by CDC to maximize the impact of federal funding: developing federal, state, and private-sector financing partnerships and exploring all possible options for supporting immunization; making full use of existing funding commitments; and managing available resources effectively. As part of its first strategy, CDC wishes to strengthen public-private financing partnerships. Dr. Simpson observed that the workshop discussions about health plan and employer perspectives on immunization issues helped demonstrate the need for greater consultation between public-sector agencies and the private sector. Another priority is more and better use of purchasing specifications for publicly and privately financed health care services to help ensure that appropriate immunization coverage is available and that immunization services meet desired performance standards. Adoption of first-dollar coverage laws by additional states
OCR for page 36
Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization, Part 2 Summary of the Austin Workshop would help remove financial barriers to immunization for some families, but ERISA exemptions mean that such laws cannot eliminate problems of underinsurance. Dr. Simpson also pointed to efforts to strengthen partnerships between public-sector agencies. In July 2000, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS; formerly the Health Care Financing Administration) authorized the use of Medicaid funds to support the development and operation of immunization registries. Because many young children are eligible for Medicaid-financed immunization services, CMS has an interest in ensuring that those children are neither under- nor over-immunized. The amount of funding available from Medicaid will depend on the proportion of Medicaid-eligible children in the registry and the state Medicaid agency’s level of control over the registry. At the time of the workshop, 5 states had submitted applications for Medicaid funds for their registries; 13 more have plans to do so. CDC’s second strategy focuses on ensuring that states make full use of VFC to provide vaccines to all eligible children. For example, states have made only limited use of VFC to comply with ACIP recommendations for vaccination of high-risk children against influenza or vaccination of high-risk adolescents against hepatitis B. Dr. Simpson noted that even though influenza is an important source of vaccine-preventable illness among children, especially those with chronic illnesses such as asthma, only 10 percent of high-risk children are vaccinated against influenza each year. Health care providers could provide immunizations against influenza to young children through their usual primary care services, but reaching high-risk adolescents would be more challenging. For them, it might be necessary to offer immunization services at sites such as sexually transmitted disease clinics or jails. Dr. Simpson noted that Texas has already instituted a hepatitis B vaccination program in its prisons. Finally, CDC is emphasizing more effective and efficient management of available resources. This includes improving management processes and strengthening accountability. Dr. Simpson cited as an example of such efforts the VFC funding awarded to Texas to support automation of the state’s pharmacy inventory system, which is used to manage VFC vaccine purchase and distribution in the state. For VFC and the Section 317 program, CDC is seeking an appropriate balance between a necessary level of federal accountability and protecting flexibility and ease of use for health departments and health care providers within each state. States are being asked to document their spending for immunization infrastructure and to account for in-kind support, such as the work that school nurses may do when they review students’ immunization records. CDC is also developing forecasting tools to improve the ability of states to estimate
OCR for page 37
Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization, Part 2 Summary of the Austin Workshop their vaccine needs. Nationally, discrepancies between estimated and actual vaccine requirements could amount to more than 1 million vaccine doses and tens of millions of dollars. In addition, CDC will give more attention to vaccine distribution and allocation to help ensure that states have equitable access to vaccines in short supply and that vaccines are targeted to recipients with the greatest need. Discussions with the states regarding a formula for allocation of Section 317 program funds are another component of CDC’s efforts to manage immunization resources effectively. CDC is also commissioning a new IOM study on financing vaccine purchase to develop long-term strategies for financing the costs of vaccine purchases.
Representative terms from entire chapter: