National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Health Plans and Employers
Suggested Citation:"CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance." Institute of Medicine. 2002. Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization: Part 2: Summary of the Austin Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10495.
×

CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance

Strategies for future financing for immunization cannot depend solely on increases in federal funding. Instead, everyone concerned about immunization should consider how to make the best use of all available resources, whether by cutting some activities, identifying previously untapped resources, or rethinking the set of relationships involved in supporting immunization activities. Diane Simpson, acting deputy director of the National Immunization Program at CDC, reviewed key elements of three broad strategies being pursued by CDC to maximize the impact of federal funding:

  1. developing federal, state, and private-sector financing partnerships and exploring all possible options for supporting immunization;

  2. making full use of existing funding commitments; and

  3. managing available resources effectively.

As part of its first strategy, CDC wishes to strengthen public-private financing partnerships. Dr. Simpson observed that the workshop discussions about health plan and employer perspectives on immunization issues helped demonstrate the need for greater consultation between public-sector agencies and the private sector. Another priority is more and better use of purchasing specifications for publicly and privately financed health care services to help ensure that appropriate immunization coverage is available and that immunization services meet desired performance standards. Adoption of first-dollar coverage laws by additional states

Suggested Citation:"CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance." Institute of Medicine. 2002. Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization: Part 2: Summary of the Austin Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10495.
×

would help remove financial barriers to immunization for some families, but ERISA exemptions mean that such laws cannot eliminate problems of underinsurance.

Dr. Simpson also pointed to efforts to strengthen partnerships between public-sector agencies. In July 2000, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS; formerly the Health Care Financing Administration) authorized the use of Medicaid funds to support the development and operation of immunization registries. Because many young children are eligible for Medicaid-financed immunization services, CMS has an interest in ensuring that those children are neither under- nor over-immunized. The amount of funding available from Medicaid will depend on the proportion of Medicaid-eligible children in the registry and the state Medicaid agency’s level of control over the registry. At the time of the workshop, 5 states had submitted applications for Medicaid funds for their registries; 13 more have plans to do so.

CDC’s second strategy focuses on ensuring that states make full use of VFC to provide vaccines to all eligible children. For example, states have made only limited use of VFC to comply with ACIP recommendations for vaccination of high-risk children against influenza or vaccination of high-risk adolescents against hepatitis B. Dr. Simpson noted that even though influenza is an important source of vaccine-preventable illness among children, especially those with chronic illnesses such as asthma, only 10 percent of high-risk children are vaccinated against influenza each year. Health care providers could provide immunizations against influenza to young children through their usual primary care services, but reaching high-risk adolescents would be more challenging. For them, it might be necessary to offer immunization services at sites such as sexually transmitted disease clinics or jails. Dr. Simpson noted that Texas has already instituted a hepatitis B vaccination program in its prisons.

Finally, CDC is emphasizing more effective and efficient management of available resources. This includes improving management processes and strengthening accountability. Dr. Simpson cited as an example of such efforts the VFC funding awarded to Texas to support automation of the state’s pharmacy inventory system, which is used to manage VFC vaccine purchase and distribution in the state. For VFC and the Section 317 program, CDC is seeking an appropriate balance between a necessary level of federal accountability and protecting flexibility and ease of use for health departments and health care providers within each state. States are being asked to document their spending for immunization infrastructure and to account for in-kind support, such as the work that school nurses may do when they review students’ immunization records. CDC is also developing forecasting tools to improve the ability of states to estimate

Suggested Citation:"CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance." Institute of Medicine. 2002. Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization: Part 2: Summary of the Austin Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10495.
×

their vaccine needs. Nationally, discrepancies between estimated and actual vaccine requirements could amount to more than 1 million vaccine doses and tens of millions of dollars. In addition, CDC will give more attention to vaccine distribution and allocation to help ensure that states have equitable access to vaccines in short supply and that vaccines are targeted to recipients with the greatest need. Discussions with the states regarding a formula for allocation of Section 317 program funds are another component of CDC’s efforts to manage immunization resources effectively. CDC is also commissioning a new IOM study on financing vaccine purchase to develop long-term strategies for financing the costs of vaccine purchases.

Suggested Citation:"CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance." Institute of Medicine. 2002. Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization: Part 2: Summary of the Austin Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10495.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance." Institute of Medicine. 2002. Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization: Part 2: Summary of the Austin Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10495.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"CDC Strategies for Immunization Finance." Institute of Medicine. 2002. Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization: Part 2: Summary of the Austin Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10495.
×
Page 37
Next: Concluding Observations »
Setting the Course: A Strategic Vision for Immunization: Part 2: Summary of the Austin Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

Immunization is essential to disease prevention efforts in public health, but the U.S. health care system faces financial challenges that are affecting the delivery of immunization services. An earlier report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), Calling the Shots: Immunization Finance Policies and Practices, pointed to the instability of the fundamental infrastructure that supports immunization programs throughout the United States, including growing financial burdens and operational complexities in immunization services, shortcomings in public- and private-sector investments in vaccine purchases and immunization programs, and fluctuations in insurance plans in the public and private health care sectors that create uncertainties regarding coverage of vaccine purchase and service delivery arrangements. In October 2001, a group of about 50 health officials, public health experts, health care providers, health plan representatives and purchasers, state legislative officials, and community leaders met at the Texas Medical Association in Austin to explore the implications of the IOM findings and recommendations for Texas. The 1-day workshop was the second in a series of four meetings organized by IOM with support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to foster informed discussions about challenges for immunization finance and future strategies for strengthening immunization activities and the public health infrastructure that supports those activities.

This report of the Austin workshop summarizes the findings of the previous IOM report and reviews continuing challenges in immunization finance for the nation and for individual states, with a particular focus on Texas. The report also highlights strategies proposed by individual workshop participants that can be used to address those challenges. Several presenters and discussants emphasized that adequate funding is necessary for immunization programs but that financial resources alone are not sufficient to guarantee success. Similarly, they indicated that no single agency or group in the public or the private sector should expect, or should be expected, to solve immunization problems. Speakers from both public and private health agencies observed that collaboration, consultation, and partnership efforts across levels of government and between the public and private sectors are essential.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!