Case #22: The participant claimed that he was present at Operation IVY. However, his service records had been damaged, and his claim that he participated in IVY could not be verified. He was not given the benefit of the doubt in evaluating his claim for a nonpresumptive disease, and no dose was calculated for possible participation in IVY. Nor was the estimated upper bound of his assigned total dose (from his participation in other test series) adjusted to reflect his possible participation in IVY. He was not contacted to investigate his claim further.
Case #53: This case provides a good example of inconsistent application of assumptions used in estimating the external dose and upper bound from boarding target ships at Operation CROSSROADS. The dose memorandum states that the veteran was given the benefit of the doubt by assuming that he participated in two-thirds of the target-ship boardings by his unit. However, the calculations in the case file are based on only one-third of the boardings. In other cases involving target-ship boarding (for example, cases #45 and 49), the veterans were usually given the benefit of the doubt by assuming that they participated in all boardings (see Figure V.A.3).