. "V. Committee's Findings Related to NTPR Dose Reconstruction Program." A Review of the Dose Reconstruction Program of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
FIGURE V.A.4 US Army observers examining dummies set up about 3,000 yards from ground zero during dry run for Operation TEAPOT Shot MET.
ground to check them. As part of this group, I was assigned to be a ground monitor. The exercise took place at a site where a nuclear detonation had occurred. I am unsure of the exact reading, but our location was radioactive enough to gather data from aircraft flyovers.
After the first series, it was decided that the aircraft probe was not accurate. We stopped for a couple of days while a lead shield was built to protect the probe in the aircraft from every angle except straight down. We then spent a few more days testing this new device. Adjustments were made, and we were in and out of the area several more times. We took readings all the way to ground zero.
This exercise was the dirtiest of my stay. Every day we were covered with dust from our travels through the test site. We had no protection and were inhaling dust constantly. I remember thinking our lungs must have looked like our clothes. I do not remember if we had film badges.
He then describes an operation (apparently at Shot APPLE-II) in which he became disoriented near ground zero:
During the test known as the Survival City Shot, I was assigned to locate a large group of military vehicles. I made several trips through the area prior to the test to orient myself to the location of these vehicles. They consisted primarily of 2 1/2 ton – 3/4 ton trucks and jeeps.