National Academies Press: OpenBook

The Experiences and Challenges of Science and Ethics: Proceedings of an American-Iranian Workshop (2003)

Chapter: Final Plenary Session: Areas for Future Cooperation

« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Final Plenary Session: Areas for Future Cooperation." National Research Council. 2003. The Experiences and Challenges of Science and Ethics: Proceedings of an American-Iranian Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10700.
×

Final Plenary Session: Areas for Future Cooperation

Kenneth Shine

Based on the voting at the Final Plenary Session, the following eight projects for future cooperation were considered to be of highest priority in the order indicated.

  1. The academies should encourage the integration of ethical values into kindergarten-grade 12 science curricula with special attention to “hands-on” approaches that encourage pupils to work together and gain an appreciation of how individual values should be reflected in real life situations.

  2. The academies should organize a workshop or study on food security, including consideration of the control of food contamination and food-borne diseases as well as the adequacy of and access to the food supply in changing demographic situations. In the project, consideration should also be given to the importance and content of nutritional diets that help prevent obesity and other food-related ailments. The project should involve a review of relevant legislation in both countries to help ensure that the project encompasses the major issues of current concern.

  3. The academies should arrange for an exchange of ethics experts who are familiar with science and technology issues. Initially one expert from each country should visit the other country and lead several seminars on science, technology, and ethics while also consulting with local experts in the field of ethics. A second step might include preparation by the two experts of a joint paper on key ethical concerns in developing and carrying out scientific research and related programs.

Suggested Citation:"Final Plenary Session: Areas for Future Cooperation." National Research Council. 2003. The Experiences and Challenges of Science and Ethics: Proceedings of an American-Iranian Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10700.
×
  1. The Iranian Academy of Sciences should review the report of the National Research Council entitled On Being a Scientist and determine whether the report or a modified version of the report would be appropriate for distribution in Iran and/or in other Muslim countries. The Iranian academy should also consider preparing a first draft of a companion report that might be entitled On Being an Engineer. After review by the U.S. National Academy of Engineering, the report might be published as a joint report of the two academies. Alternatively, each side could prepare its own version of the report.

  2. The academies in the two countries should consider organizing an exchange of experts in the field of cancer epidemiology who might compare different approaches to assessing the impact of environmental pollutants on cancer rates including impacts from the petrochemical industry. A second priority field for an exchange of experts should be medical genetics.

  3. The academies should consider organizing workshops on environmental education at various levels from kindergarten through university. A unique aspect of the workshops would be to develop modules for appropriate levels that could be presented in films and other animated forms that attract the interest of students.

  4. The academies should organize workshops and related activities on the legal and policy frameworks for addressing environmental issues while also encouraging the development of sister city arrangements between municipalities that have been concerned with health, environmental, and other issues involving a host of ethical considerations.

  5. The academies should facilitate exchanges of scientists, educators, and students that emphasize the ethical aspects of the education process. One approach would be to enlist the participation of organizations in the two countries that have histories of promoting exchanges that are sensitive to ethical issues.

More than a dozen other suggestions were presented in the reports of the breakout groups. While the participants decided not to expand the priority list to accommodate more of these suggestions, they agreed that these suggestions should not be lost, and included them in the reports of the breakout groups.

Suggested Citation:"Final Plenary Session: Areas for Future Cooperation." National Research Council. 2003. The Experiences and Challenges of Science and Ethics: Proceedings of an American-Iranian Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10700.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Final Plenary Session: Areas for Future Cooperation." National Research Council. 2003. The Experiences and Challenges of Science and Ethics: Proceedings of an American-Iranian Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10700.
×
Page 2
Next: Research Integrity »
The Experiences and Challenges of Science and Ethics: Proceedings of an American-Iranian Workshop Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In April 2002, the U.S. National Academies hosted an interacademy workshop involving participants from the United States and Iran on the topic of Science and Ethics. The explicit purposes of the workshop were (a) to engage important members of the American and Iranian scientific communities in meaningful discussions of the topic of science and ethics and particularly differences in the approaches in the west and in Islamic countries in general and Iran in particular, (b) to encourage greater participation by Iranian scientists in international scientific discussions by exposing them to seasoned veterans in international meetings, and (c) to identify specific topics and approaches that could be carried out by the Academies in the two countries to contribute to international understanding of the importance of considering the ethical dimensions of scientific research and related activities. This report includes documents prepared by four breakout groups and a statement on priority areas for future interacademy cooperation developed at the final plenary session. Also included are background papers prepared by some participants prior to the workshop that were not previously published.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!