National Academies Press: OpenBook

Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary (2003)

Chapter: Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice

« Previous: Foreign Scientists Seen Essential to U.S. Biotechnology
Suggested Citation:"Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2003. Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10727.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2003. Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10727.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2003. Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10727.
×
Page 39

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Thomas Lenox, Senior Managing Director of Education, Geographic Services, & Diversity American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) POLICY The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) supports the concept of the master's degree or equivalent as a prerequisite for licensure and the practice of civil engineering at a professional level. ASCE encourages institutions of higher education, governmental units, employers, civil engineers, and other appropriate organizations to endorse, support, and promote the concept of mandatory postbaccalau- reate education for the practice of civil engineering at a professional level. The implementation of this effort should occur through establishing ap- propriate curricula in the formal education experience, appropriate rec- ognition and compensation in the workplace, and congruent standards for licensure. ISSUE The practice of civil engineering at the professional level means prac- tice as a licensed professional engineer. Admission to the practice of civil engineering at the professional level means professional engineering li- censing, which requires: · A body of specialized knowledge as reflected by a combination of a baccalaureate degree and a master's or equivalent · Appropriate experience · Commitment to lifelong learning

PAN-~CANIZAHONAL SUMMIT The required body of specialized knowledge includes a technical core, technical electives, a nontechnical core, and technical and nontechnical courses to support individual career objectives. The current baccalaureate civil engineering degree is an entry-level degree that may no longer be adequate preparation for the practice of civil engineering at the profes- sional level. The civil engineering profession is undergoing significant, rapid, and revolutionary changes that have increased the body of knowledge re- auired of the nrofe.~.sion. These changes include the following: · Globalization has challenged the worldwide geographic bound- aries normally recognized in the past, primarily as a result of enhanced communication systems. · Information technology has made, and continues to make, more information available; however, the analysis and application of this infor- mation is becoming more challenging. · The diversity of society is challenging our traditional views and people skills. · New technologies in engineering and construction are emerging at an accelerating rate. · Enhanced public awareness of technical issues is creating more in- formed inquiry by the public of the technical, environmental, societal, political, legal, aesthetic, and financial implications of engineering projects. · Civil infrastructure systems within the United States are rapidly changing from decades of development and operation to the renewal, maintenance, and improvement of these systems. These changes have created a market requiring civil engineers to have simultaneously greater breadth of capability and specialized technical competence than that required of previous generations. For example, many civil engineers must increasingly assume a different primary role from that of designer to that of team leader. The knowledge required to support this new market is found in the combination of an appropriate baccalaureate education and the completion of postgraduate courses suf- ficient to attain a master's degree or its equivalent. RATIONALE Requiring education beyond the baccalaureate degree for the practice of civil engineering at the professional level is consistent with other

~MERICAN SOCILTY OF CIV~ FNGIl~S learned professions. The body of knowledge gained and the skills devel- oped in the formal civil engineering education process are not significantly less than the comparable knowledge and skills required in these other professions. It is not reasonable in such complex and rapidly changing times to think that we can impart the specialized body of knowledge and skills required of professional engineers in 4 years of formal schooling while other learned professions take 7 or 8 years. Four years of formal schooling were considered the standard for three professions (medicine, law, and engineering) 100 years ago, and, whereas medicine and law edu- cation lengthened with the growing demands of their respective profes- sions, engineering education did not. Perhaps this retention of a 4-year undergraduate engineering education has contributed to the lowered es- teem of engineering in the eyes of society, and the commensurate decline in compensation of engineers relative to medical doctors and lawyers. Current baccalaureate programs, while constantly undergoing review and revisions, still retain a nominal 4-year education process. This length of time limits the ability of these programs to provide a formal education consistent with the increasing demands of the practice of civil engineer- ing at the professional level. There are diametrically opposed forces try- ing to squeeze more content into the baccalaureate curriculum while at the same time reducing the credit hours necessary for the baccalaureate degree. The result is a production-line baccalaureate civil engineering (BSCE) degree that is satisfactory for an entry-level position but which may be inadequate for the professional practice of civil engineering. The 4-year internship period (engineer-in-training) after receipt of the BSCE degree cannot make up for the formal educational material that would be gained from a master's degree or equivalent program. This concept will not be implemented overnight. Although ASCE can- not mandate that it be done in a specified time period or manner, ASCE will be an active partner with other groups and organizations to institute this policy. The ultimate full implementation may not occur for 20 or more years. Appropriate grandfathering for existing registered and degreed engineers would be a part of the implementation process. This concept is a legacy for future generations of civil engineers. However, perhaps the most important aspect of the implementation of this policy is already in place. Within the U.S. system of higher education, high-quality, innova- tive, and diverse master's degree programs currently exist in colleges and universities to support this concept. A growing number of organizations now offer high-quality on-site and distance learning educational oppor- tunities. The active support of this policy by all of the stakeholders in this process, such as the educational institutions, the registration boards, and the various employers of civil engineers, will be required to develop and promote the elements necessary to eventually implement this concept.

Next: Engineering Education and the Science & Engineering Workforce »
Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $59.00 Buy Ebook | $47.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Each of 32 nonprofit organizations contributing a presentation to the Pan-Organizational Summit on the Science and Engineering Workforce (November 11-12, 2002; The National Academies, Washington, DC) was invited to issue a corresponding position paper to be reproduced in this volume. The bulk of this report comprises these papers. In addition, Shirley Jackson and Joseph Toole, two of the keynote speakers, have included their remarks.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!