Items in cart [1] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK list:$22.00 Web:$19.80 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Free Resources Sign in to download PDF book and chapters PDF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence -- Special Report 282 The Fuel Tax and Alternatives for Transportation Funding: Special Report 285 Other Related Titles Buckling Up: Technologies to Increase Seat Belt Use -- Special Report 278 (2004) Transportation Research Board (TRB) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 95   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Appendix B ANALYSIS OF RATINGS FROM NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS AND FOCUS GROUPS Table B-1 Summary of Participants in NHTSA In-Depth Interviews and Focus Groups by Location and User Group User Category Phoenix, Ariz. Portsmouth, N.H. St. Louis, Mo. Total In-depth (individual, in-person)         interviews           Part-time users 25 30 34 89   Hard-core nonusers 6 8 3 17 Focus groups of full-time users 0 0 35 35 Total 31 38 72 141 Page 95 Front Matter (R1-R12) Executive Summary (1-16) 1 Introduction (17-28) 2 Seat Belt Use and Characteristics of Nonusers (29-41) 3 Historical Experience with Seat Belt Use Technologies (42-52) 4 Current Experience with Seat Belt Use Technologies (53-78) 5 A Strategy for Increasing Seat Belt Use Through Technology (79-93) Appendix A Congressional Request for Seat Belt Use Technology Study (94-94) Appendix B Analysis of Ratings from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration In-Depth Interviews and Focus Groups (95-97) Study Committee Biographical Information (98-104)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 95
Buckling Up: Technologies to Increase Seat Belt Use Appendix B ANALYSIS OF RATINGS FROM NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS AND FOCUS GROUPS Table B-1 Summary of Participants in NHTSA In-Depth Interviews and Focus Groups by Location and User Group User Category Phoenix, Ariz. Portsmouth, N.H. St. Louis, Mo. Total In-depth (individual, in-person)         interviews           Part-time users 25 30 34 89   Hard-core nonusers 6 8 3 17 Focus groups of full-time users 0 0 35 35 Total 31 38 72 141

OCR for page 96
Buckling Up: Technologies to Increase Seat Belt Use Table B-2 Analysis of Ratings from NHTSA In-Depth Interviews and Focus Groups by Technology, Overall and by User Group(Rating Scale: 1 = Least; 5 = Most) (Percentage of Respondents’ Ratings) Reported Acceptability Reported Effectiveness   Rating Ford Saab Entertainment Interlock Transmission Interlock Rating Ford Saab Entertainment Interlock Transmission Interlock Overall (N = 141)                     1 9 16 27 31 1 6 5 15 4   2 6 11 18 14 2 6 5 12 4   3 14 16 18 11 3 9 7 13 4   4 21 18 14 13 4 21 23 11 4   5 50 38 23 30 5 57 60 50 84 Full-Time Users (N = 35)                     1 0 14 31 29 1 0 6 17 0   2 3 14 20 26 2 0 3 17 3   3 3 11 29 14 3 0 6 14 0   4 14 20 11 9 4 11 26 6 0   5 80 40 9 23 5 89 60 46 97 Part-Time Users (N = 89)                     1 9 11 24 27 1 7 3 14 6   2 7 11 17 10 2 7 6 10 4   3 20 18 15 11 3 12 7 14 2   4 22 18 17 16 4 25 19 12 6   5 42 42 28 36 5 49 65 51 82 Hard-Core Nonusers (N = 17)                     1 29 47 35 59 1 18 12 18 6   2 6 6 18 12 2 12 6 12 0   3 0 12 12 6 3 12 12 6 18   4 29 18 6 6 4 24 35 12 6   5 35 18 29 18 5 35 35 53 71 NOTE: The percentages may not total 100 because of rounding.

OCR for page 97
Buckling Up: Technologies to Increase Seat Belt Use Table B-3 Analysis of Ratings from NHTSA In-Depth Interviews and Focus Groups by Gender, Age, and Location Mean Acceptability Mean Effectiveness   Ford Saab Entertainment Interlock Transmission Interlock   Ford Saab Entertainment Interlock Transmission Interlock Analysis by Gender                   Male (N = 57) 3.82 3.33 2.89 2.54 Male (N = 57) 3.88 3.98 3.74 4.42 Female (N = 84) 4.08 3.63 2.89 3.26 Female (N = 84) 4.38 4.49 3.64 4.74 Analysis by Age                   16-25 (N = 22) 4.00 3.23 3.09 2.59 16-25 (N = 22) 3.73 4.09 4.36 4.32 26-40 (N = 52) 3.60 3.40 2.92 2.54 26-40 (N = 52) 4.08 4.33 4.02 4.52 41-55 (N = 38) 4.18 3.58 2.89 3.21 41-55 (N = 38) 4.21 4.05 3.26 4.74 56 and over (N = 29) 4.38 3.83 2.69 3.72 56 and over (N = 29) 4.65 4.66 3.11 4.83 Analysis by Location                   St. Louis (N = 72) 4.18 3.36 2.57 2.76 St. Louis (N = 72) 4.46 4.29 3.61 4.72 Phoenix (N = 31) 3.87 3.77 3.45 3.35 Phoenix (N = 31) 4.05 4.35 4.06 4.42 Portsmouth (N = 38) 3.68 3.58 3.05 3.05 Portsmouth (N = 38) 3.74 4.21 3.50 4.55

Representative terms from entire chapter:

interlock transmission