Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Twenty-Fourth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics (2003)
Naval Studies Board (NSB)

Page
588
bottomleft bottomright
Page
588
Front Matter (R1-R13)
Opening Remarks (1-1)
Microbubbles: Drag Reduction Mechanism and Applicability to Ships (2-22)
Wave Patterns and Minimum Wave Resistance for High Speed Vessels (23-39)
Prediction of High Reynolds Number Flow Around Naval Vessels (40-64)
Frontiers in Experimental Techniques (65-79)
Toward Virtual Reality by Computational Physics (80-97)
Study on the CFD Application for VLCC Hull-Form Design (98-109)
Unsteady RANS Simulation of a Surface Combatant with Roll Motion (110-127)
On the Role Played by Turbulence Closures in Hull Shape Optimatization at Model and Full Scale (128-144)
The Use of a RANS Code in the Design and Analysis of a Naval Combatant (145-160)
Efficient Methods to Compute Steady Ship Viscous Flow with Free Surface (161-176)
Hydrofoil Near-Wake Structure and Dynamics at High Reynolds Number (177-191)
Unstructured Nonlinear Free Surface Simulations for the Fully Appended DTMB Model 5415 Series Hull Including Rotating Propulsors (192-210)
Bow Waves on a Free-Running, Heaving, and/or Pitching Destroyer (211-223)
Numerical Simulation of Two-Dimensional Breaking Waves Past a Submerged Hydrofoil (224-230)
Genesis of Design Wave Groups in Extreme Seas for the Evaluation of Wave/Structure Interaction (231-253)
Direct Numerical Simulation of Surface Tension Dominated and Non-Dominated Breaking Waves (254-267)
Towards the Simulation of Seakeeping and Manoeuvering Based on the Computation of the Free Surface Viscous Ship Flow (268-281)
A 2D+T VOF Fully Coupled Formulation for Calculation of Breaking Free Surface Flow (282-295)
Breaking Waves Generated by a Fast Displacement Ship Model (296-304)
An Experimental and Computational Study of Three-Dimensional Unsteady Flow Features Found Behind a Truncated Cylinder (305-321)
A Finite Amplitude Steady Ship Motion Model (322-332)
Whipping Loads Due to Aft Body Slamming (333-347)
A Nonlinear Stability Analysis of Tandem Offloading System (348-359)
A Spectral-Shell Solution for Viscous Wave-Body Interactions (360-375)
Application of a 3-D Time Domain Panel Method to Ship Seakeeping Problems (376-392)
Water Shipping on a Vessel in Head Waves (393-412)
Nonlinear Green Water Effects on Ship Motions and Structural Loads (413-427)
Complete Cancellation of Ship Waves in a Narrow Shallow Channel (428-440)
Wash Waves Generated by Ships Moving on Fairways of Varying Topography (441-457)
Validation and Application of Chimera RANS Method for Ship-Ship Interactions in Shallow Water and Restricted Waterway (458-474)
Development, Validation, and Application of a Time Domain Seakeeping Method for High-Speed Craft with a Ride Control System (475-490)
A Flow Model for a Displacement-Type Fast Ship with Shallow Draft in Regular Waves (491-501)
Nonlinear Free-Surface Effects on the Resistance and Squat of High-Speed Vessels with a Transom Stern (502-516)
Numerical Simulation of Wakes in a Weakly Stratified Fluid (517-533)
LES of Bubble Dynamics in Wake Flows (534-551)
Propeller Inflow at Full Scale During a Manoeuver (552-567)
An Evaluation of Verification Procedure for CFD Applications (568-587)
Calculations of Flows Over Underwater Appended Bodies with High Resolution ENO Schemes (588-594)
Validation of Numerical Method for Predicting Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a High-Speed Ship (595-608)
High-Incidence and Dynamic Pitch-Up Maneuvering Characteristics of a Prolate Spheroid-CFD Validation (609-623)
Validation of Control-Surface Induced Submarine Maneuvering Simulations Using UNCLE (624-639)
Planing Hull Performance Evaluation Using a General Purpose CFD Code (640-654)
PIV Measurements of the Cross-Flow Wake of a Turning Submarine Model (ONR Body 1) (655-668)
Validation of the Flow Around a Turning Submarine (669-681)
Viscous Roll Predictions of a Circular Cylinder with Bilge Keels (682-697)
Analysis of a Jet-Controlled High-Lift Hydrofoil with a Flop (698-707)
Prediction of Slam Loads on Wedge Section Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Techniques (708-720)
Using Recursive Neural Networks for Blind Predictions of Submarine Maneuvers (721-743)
Scale Effects on Ducted Propellers (744-759)
Hull Vibration Excitation by Propeller Sources: A Link Between Hydrodynamics and Marine Acoustics (760-773)
Experimental and CFD Analysis for Rotor-Stator Interaction of a Waterjet Pump (774-788)
Propeller Wake Analysis Behind a Ship by Stereo PIV (789-805)
Numerical Study on Propulsion by Undulating Motion in Laminar-Turbulent Flow (806-818)
A BEM Technique for the Modeling of Supercavitating and Surface-Piercing Propeller Flows (819-838)
A New Propeller Design Method for the POD Propulsion System (839-851)
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Cavitation Pattern on a Marine Propeller (852-867)
Prediction of Vortex Cavitation Inception Using Coupled Spherical and Non-Spherical Models and UnRANS Computations (868-880)
Influence of Acoustic Interaction in Noise Generating Cavitation (881-897)
Phase-Average PIV for Surface Combatant in Regular Head Waves (898-915)
Phase-Averaged PTV Measurements of Propeller Wake (916-926)
Quantitative Visualization (QVix) Hydrodynamic Measurement Technique of Multiphase Unsteady Surfaces (927-939)
Computation of Viscous Flow Around Fast Ship Superstructures (940-949)
Tracking Vortices Over Large Distances Using Vorticity Confinement (950-962)
A Panel-Free Method for Time-Domain Analysis (963-976)
Multi Objective Optimization of Ship Hull Form Design by Response Surface Methodology (977-990)
Computational Design Optimization Using RANS (991-1001)
List of Attendees (1002-1006)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 588
24~ Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics Fukuoka, JAPAN, 8-13 July 2002 Calculations of Flows over Underwater Appended Bodies with High Resolution ENO Schemes Zhen-yu Huang, Hong-rong Cheng, Lian-di Zhou (China Ship Scientific research Center, Wu Xi, 214082, China) ABSTRACT The numerical method based on flux difference splitting LU decomposition; implicit high- resolution third order Essentially Non-oscillatory (ENO) scheme is constructed for efficient computations of steady-state solution to three- dimensional, incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in general coordinates. The flowfields over underwater axisymmetric bodies, full-appended axisymmetric bodies and axisymetric bodies with a ring-wing duct are simulated. The method has been shown to be capable of predicting the circumferential-mean velocity distribution at model scale to accuracies of around 3% of measured values, and of predicting some details of flow feature, for example the wake harmonics. KEYWORDS Essentially Non-Oscillatory (ENO) Schemes, Flux Splitting, LU Decomposition, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) INTRODUCTION The flow over an underwater appended vessel during level flight is characterized by the development of thick boundary layers, flow separation, flow into and through the propulsor, vortices formed at the root and tip of appendages and appendage turbulent wake. The spatial nonuniformity and temporal fluctuations of flow into vessel propulsor significantly affect propulsor noise. Whilst the fluid flow can be measured by using a scale model of the vessel in a towing tank or wind tunnel, there are errors associated with applying results obtained at model scale to full scale. Furthermore, the experiment requires many detailed measurements to be taken in the regions of interest. This is costly and time consuming. Recent advances in CFD have been developed, which have been shown to be capable of predicting flow over full-appended underwater bodiesEHuang, 20011. This paper presents a high-resolution numerical method, which have been used to calculate the flowfields over appended underwater bodies. The appendages include a fairwater, four-wing stern appendages and a ring- wing duct. The numerical scheme based on flux- difference splitting, LU decomposition and implicit high resolution third-order ENO achieved through flux reconstruction, are constructed for efficient simulation of steady-state solution to three- dimensional, incompressible conservative Navier- Stokes equations in general coordinates. The schemes have been shown to be capable of predicting the circumferential-mean velocity distributions at the propulsor plane of full appended submarine-like bodies to accuracies of around 3% of measured values in wind tunnel, and of predicting some details of flow feature. The computer code has been applied to evaluate and optimize the flow characteristics over single axisymmetric bodies and underwater full- appended bodies and to simulate axisymmetric bodies with a ring-wing duct. GOVERNING EQUATIONS . The governing equations, which describe the motion of viscous, incompressible fluid, are Navier- Stokes equations and the equation of continuity. Artificial compressibility method, which adds a time- derivative of the pressure to the continuity equation, can couple the equations of motion with the . . ,

OCR for page 589
continuity equation. Then the most efficient implicit time-dependent methods can be applied to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, the complete set of governing equations can be solved simultaneously~Peter, 19881. The Navier-Stokes equations in conservation law form for an incompressible, three-dimensional flow are written as Q'+(E -EV)X +(F -FV)Y +(G -GV)Z =0 With the inviscid flux vectors E = ( pu, u + pi us, uw) F = ( pV,Uv, V2 + petit (2b) G = (~,uw,~,w + p) (2c) And the shear flux vectors EV = Re~~0~2ux~uy +vx~uz + WX)T FV = Rem (0, uy + Ax, ,2vy, vz + wy )T GV = Rem (0, uz + wx, vz + wy,2wz AT Where Re is Reynolds number. Following the artificial compressibility method, the dependent vector Q in Eq. (1) is defined as Q=(p,u,v,w) (4) Considering a coordinate transformation of the form ~ =~(x,y,z), 77 =r1(x,y,z), and 5 =5(x,y,z), Equal) can be rewritten in strong conversation law form. (QIJ)t +(E-EV): +(F-FV)n +(G-GV)5 =0 (5) The flux vectors E, F. G are linear combination of E ,F ,G in Eq. (11. For example, E can be written as E = (4X I J)E + (;Y I J)F + (¢Z I J)G (6) Where J is the Jacobean of the coordinate transfor- mation. HIGH RESOLUTION SCHEMES FOR INVISCID FLUX Because of the complicity of flowfield structure around the underwater bodies with full appendages, the Essentially Non-oscillatory (ENO) schemes [Harten,1987], which were developed by Harten et al, are applied in discretization of inviscid flux of three-dimensional incompressible Navier- Stokes equations. The ENO schemes, which use adapted stencil, are uniformly high-order accuracy throughout even at critical points. Following Yang [Yang 1992,Huang 1999, 2000], third-order nonoscillatory schemes are given `2ay below. TakedE`:in direction ~ as an example, let A = bE/3Q, (A E ji+l/2 = (71, /2, 73, /4 ~ iS the eigenvalue diagonal matrix of A. R and L is right and left eigenvector matrices of AK. Then one can get A=RAEL. The spatial difference of E`: can be reached by using finite volume method (3a) (FVM)[Huang 1999, 20001. (3b) (3c) And E`.EN,°32 = 2 (Ei + Em + Ri+~,2O ~EN1O,32 ) (8) E: = EEN03 _ EEN03 (7) Let ~i+l/2 = L(Qi+~ - Qi), the components of ~~.E+l03 can be defined as ~+l/2 = ~~/i+l/2~i + fit) (/i+l/2 tori + ~i+ - ~~;i+l/2 + ii+l/2 + ii+l/2 ~ai+l/2'~ai-1/2 ~ < ~ai+l/ + A ;i+l/2 tori + ~i+1 ~ - ~~/i+l/2 + ii+l/2 + ti+l/2 ~ai+ll2,1ai ll2 | > |ai+ll2 | Where 6, 6, and ~ functions are given by: 6(z) = 2 (#r(z) - BZ2 ) (10) (Z) = 6 (2|z| - 3BIzl2 + B2lzl3 ) ~(Z) = ~ (B2 1Z13 - 1Zl) (12) (11) { ( Z + £ 2 ~ / £ k At' £

OCR for page 590
His a small positive constant. B is the value of At I A; . One can find that the flux OiE+N/ 3 iS self- adapted with the distribution of the flowfield physics. And pi = min mod[(xi+ll2 '(7i-l/2 ] (14) ~ =m[^ Hi lid, /~+ai lit] lai lit| <|ai+l,2| (15) pi=m[~-ai+ll2' ^+`xi+l/2] lail,2|>|ai+l,21 (16) Ill/ 2 = ~ (ai+l/ 2 )~(§i+1 ~ i) / ~i+l/2 ai+ll2 ~ O ~ O otherwise _ _ ~i+l/2 = ~ (ai+l/2 ) ('i+1 -§ i) /~i+112 ~i+l/2 ~ O I O otherwise (18) A ~ i+l/2 = ~ (ai+l/2 ) (§i+1 -I i) /ai+ll2 ai+l/2 ~ O otherwise (19) H = it + jH(~) + kH(5 H(~)=E-R Ev H(~) = F- R Fv H( ) =G- ~ G (22) If Eq. (21) is applied over a hexahedral cell (/~=/~=~\5=1), temporal derivative discretiza- tion uses the first-order-accurate differencing, inviscid terms use implicit differencing, viscous (17) terms use explicit central differencing, Eq. (4) will be discretized as J ~ (Qn+~ _ Qn ~ + Att [E.n+~/2—E'n+~, + fF,.n++,.,2—F,.n+~,2 ~ + EGkn++~,2—Gkn+i, = ~ ~ LEV .n+l,2—EVin I,2 ~ + EFvj+~/2—Fv~-~/2 + [GVk+~/2 GVk-~/2 ~ ~ (23) {Z eye> ~Z~ (20) The definition of (A~)i+~,2 and A = (dE I aQ)i+~,2 are same as the last section. Let The remaining fluxes of three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations (Eq.(5)) can be defined with the similar way. LU DECOMPOSITION FOR TEMPORAL DERIVATIVE (AK )i+l/2 = [(AK )i+l/2 + |(AE )i+l/2 |] / 2 (24) If LE ~ RE are the left and right eigenvector matrices of Jocob matrix A, one can get By using Finite Volume Method (FVM), the AN = ReAi LE (25a) integrated form of Eq. (5) can be rewritten as[Huang and Zhou. 2000,2001] Similarly —[— -IQ V]+— H.dS =— D V Bi =RFA-FLF (25b) ~tV; Al Vl Where S is the surface around the cell, do is the normal vector of each surface, H is the tensor whose vector components in three directions are (21) C = RGAGLG (25c) Let Qn+1 _ On = i\Qn LU decomposition formula of Eq.(5) caI1 be expressed as

OCR for page 591
J-l[I+AtJ(A+ +B+ +C+ )]x [I—~J(A- + B- + C- )]~`Qin; =—Ad{ [El+ll2—El-ll2) + (FJ+l/2—FJ-l/2 ) + (Gk+l,2—Gk l,2 )] } + R { [EVI+1I2—Evl-l/2 ] + [Fv)+l/2—Fv) l/2 ] + [Gvk+l/2—Gvk_l/2 ] } TURBULENCE MODEL The effects of turbulence fluctuations, which can be solved on the computational grid, are approximated with simple Smagorinsky model. A, = (CsL)2lSijI (27) Sip = 2 (Oxj + Oxi ) In which the model coefficient Cs = 0~05 ~ 0.1 and length scale is geometric mean of the grid spacing L = (~c/\yAz)l/3 . RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The flowfields around the appended underwater axisymmetric bodies are simulated as steady-state solutions to the incompressible Navier- Stokes equations. The appendages include a fairwater, four-wing stern appendages and a ring-wing duct. Three kinds of flowfields are included in the numerical simulation. They are the flowfield over the axisymmetric bodies, the axisymmetric bodies appended with a fairwater and four-wing stern appendages and the axisymmetric bodies with a ring wing duct. The main bodies of most modern underwater vessels are axisymmetric or cylinder-like shapes, such as submarine, torpedo or other deep-sea vehicles. For validation of numerical method, the flowfield around the axisymmetric bodies are simulated firstly. Fig.1 shows the comparison of the numerical velocity distributions at difference positions with the experimental data, which are measured in wind tunnel. The numerical results agree with the measured very well, which indicates that the third-order ENO schemes are high resolution, and can be used in the numerical simulation of three- dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. In general, the geometry of underwater vehicles are very complex. There are various appendages attached to the main body. Take submarines as an example, the appendages include a fairwater, rudder, several wing-like stern appendages, and even a ring-wing-like duct. The flowfields around underwater axisymm- etric bodies with a fairwater and four-wing stern appendages are simulated with the third-order high- resolution ENO schemes. The complete calculations (26) are carried out by two steps. The flowfields around the body and a fariwater are numerically simulated firstly, which can provide the inlet boundary condition for the following fine simulation of flowfield around stern part of body and four-wing stern appendages. The numerical dimensionless circumferential -mean velocity along the radius of the propeller are presented in Fig. 2, which are in good agreement with the experimental data. The details of numerical dimensionless circumferential-mean velocity and the experimental data can also been found in Table 1. 28 Except one points, the relative error between the numerical results and the experimental data is less than 3%, their average relative error is only 2.107%, the accurate numerical nominal wake at propeller can be used as input data of vehicle propulsor blade design. Also the numerical dimensionless circumferential velocity distributions at different radius station are showed in Fig. 3(a)-Fig. 3(e). There are difference between the numerical results and the experimental data, but their phases are similar, so the calculated circumferential velocity can be applied to the optimization and evaluation of hydrodynamics noise of vehicle propulsor. The same accuracy has been reached from the other numerical simulations over different models. The code developed in this paper has been used in the design and optimization of new underwater bodies with full appendages. Table 1. Comparison of Numerical circumfere- ntial velocity with experimental data r/R 0.217 0.300 0.400 0.518 0.678 0.840 1.000 Numerical results 0. 4866 0. 5177 0. 5471 0. 5935 0. 6681 0. 7387 0. 7933 Experiment data 0. 4833 0. 4911 0. 5319 0. 5993 T o. 6814 0. 7479 _ 0. 8064 Error (%) . 0.68 . 5.42 2.88 -0.97 -1.95 -1.23 -1.62

OCR for page 592
Ducted propulsors are known to offer significant advantages for particular marine applications, such as increases in efficiency for high propeller loading with flow-accelerating ducts, or alternatively smaller propeller sizes; reduction of inflow velocity and, consequently, of cavitation and noise with flow-decelerating ducts; better control over the inflow to the propeller; improvement of maneuverability and position-keeping abilities of vessels; protection from damage to the propeller, etc. The ducted propeller has been installed in underwater vehicle, such as submarine and torpedo, to increase the vehicle speed and reduce the propeller hydrodynamics noise. The inflow velocity, which is related to the geometry of ducts and the interaction between duct and main body, is very important to the design of propulsors' blade. For the first step, the flowfields around the axisymmetric bodies with a ring-wing duct has been simulated. The numerical results are presented in Fig.4, which is compared with the experimental data measured in wind tunnel. Because the geometry used in the calculation is little different from the real model, which attached more appendages. Meanwhile the experimental data is very limited. The numerical results do not agree with the experimental very well. But, by the innovation of numerical schemes and multi-block grid system, the internal and external flows of the combinations of full-appended unterwater bodies and ring-wing duct will be simulated more accurately. It is sure that the numerical nominal wake in the duct would be used in the design of duct-propeller. CONCLUSION Based on flux splitting, implicit high- resolution schemes have been constructed for efficient calculations of steady-state solutions to the three dimensional, incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in curvilinear coordinates. The third-order- accurate efficient ENO has been applied in the calculations, which can capture the details of the flowfield around underwater bodies with full appendages. The numerical results agree quite well with the experimental data. The schemes and code developed in this paper can be applied in the design of underwater vehicle propulsor and in the optimization and evaluation of its hydrodynamics noise. Also the code can be used in the optimization and design of shapes of vehicle body and its appendages. ACKNOWLEDGE The project was supported by Shanghai Natural Science Fund (No.OOZF14065) and National Key Laboratory on Hydrodynamics (No. H9958~. REFERENCE Peter M. Hartwich, Chung Hao Hsu, "High - resolution upwind schemes for the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations", AILS J. Vol. 26,No.11,1988,pp.1321-1326 Harten A, Osher S. "Uniformly High-order Accurate Nonoscillatory Schemes I", STAM J. on Numer. Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1997, pp.279-309 Huang Zhenyu, "Numerical simulation of jet flows and nozzle flows", Doctorial dissertation, Beijing Institute of Technology~in Chinese), 1999 Yang J. Y. "High-resolution, nonoscillatory schemes for unsteady compressible flows", AI4A J. Vol.30, No.6, 1992,pp.570-1575 Huan~ ZhenYu. "Flowfield calculation with high resolution ENO", The proceedings of eighth international space conference of pacific-basin societies (8~ ISCOPS), Xitan China, l 999,pp.691- 697 Huang Zhenyu, Xu Wencan, "Flowfield calculation with high resolution ENO", ACTA Aerodynarnica SINICA, Vol.18, No.1, 2000, pp.14-21 (in Chinese) Huang Zhenyu, Xu Wencan, Numerical simulation of turbulent jet, Journal of Reijing, Institute of Technology, Vol.19, No.6, 1999, pp.691-695 (in Chinese) Huang Zhenyu, Zhou Liandi and Zhao Feng "High- resolution schemes in simulation of flowfield around submarines", Technical Report 00867, CSSRC, 2000 (in Chinese) Huang Zhenyu, Zhou Liandi, "Numerical Simulation of Flows over Underwater Axisymmetric Bodies with Full Appendages, .Shipbuilding of China, Vol.42, No.4, 2001, pp.6- 11 (in Chinese) Zhenyu Huang, Liandi Zhou, "Numerical Simulation of Flows over Underwater Axisymmetric Bodies with Full Appendages", proceedings of Fighth International Symposium on Practical Design of Sllips and Other Floating, Structure, Sept. 16-21, Shanghai, China, pp. 429-436

OCR for page 593
0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 o 0.8 _ 0.6 0.4 0.2 _ 1 1 1 ~ ~ I , , , , I 0.15 0.2 0.25 ut R ~ig. l (a) x=-0.4333m _~ ~ — ~ ' ;1 Exp. Cal. . ~ 1 1 1 ~ I I I I,,,, I,,,, I 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 R Figl.(c) x=-O. 130 Figl. The comparison of velocity distribution at difference x-axis stationsk the x=0 is at the tail of body) 0.8t 0.75 0.7 .65 /,.... r Cal. /' / /K' ~ 06 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Fig. 2 Comparison of numerical circumferential- mean velocity at propeller plane with experimental data — Exp. ~ C~. ~ , " ~ , ~/, n ,,,, .,,,, ',,,, ',,,, I 45 90 1 35 180 deg Fig.3(a) r/R=0.30U 0.8 0.6~ 0.4L 0.~ nQ ~/ — Exp. — C~. /, / ,, 1 1,, ,, 1, ,, , 1 90 135 180 deg Fig.3(b) r/R=0.518 '''~ WN W~ 3.6~l'' 0.4 0.2 Exp. C~. 1 , , , 1 1 45 90 1 35 . ~ Fig.3(c) r/R=0.678

OCR for page 594
1 0.8 0.4 o 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 , . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ 45 90 1 35 deg Fig.3(d) r/~=0.840 Ol . I , - Exp. — — — Cal l 180 i_ i= · Exp. _ _ _ — — Cal. l 135 180 deg Fig.3(e) r/R=l.OOO Fig.3 Circumferential variation of axial velocity at difference radius station of propeller plane 0.6 0.4 x 0.2 o 0.6 0.4 0.2 ,ii _ ~! / /f' ' —~ / . ~ / ' _ /, At' , . . . . , . . . . , 0.06 0.08 0. R Fig4.(a) In duct(x=-0.165) 0.8 X- _ ,, 1 0 O.05 , it, , . . . . , R . . . . . , 0.15 0.2 Fig4.(b) Behind the duct(x=0.03) Fig. 4 Comparison the velocity distributions internal and external of the ring-wing duct around axisymmetric bodies.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

stern appendages