Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 353
References
Abbott, A. 2002. Effect of Riparian Vegetation on Stream Temperature in the Shasta River.
M.S. Thesis, University of California, Davis, CA. 144 pp.
Adams, R.M., P.R. 13errens, A. Cerda, H. Li, and C.P. Klingeman. 1993. Developing a
bioeconomic model for riverine management: Case of the John Day River, Oregon.
Rivers 4(3):213-226.
Amory, C. 1926. Agriculture and wild fowl conservation at Lower Klamath Lake. New
Reclamation Era (May)17:80-82.
Andreasen, J.K. 1975. Systematics and Status of the Family Catostomidae in Southern Or-
egon. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 76 pp.
Anglin, D.R. 1994. Lower Klamath River Instream Flow Study. Lower Columbia River Fish-
eries Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dept. of Interior, Vancouver, WA. 46 pp.
Argus, D.F., and R.G. Gordon. 1990. Pacific-North American plate motion from very long
baseline interferometry compared with motion inferred from magnetic anomalies, trans-
form faults, and earthquake slip vectors. J. Geophys. Res. 95(11): 17315-17324.
Baker, P.F., T.P. Speed, and F.K. Ligon. 1995. Estimating the influence of temperature on the
survival of chinook salmon smolts (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) migrating through the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta of California. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52(4):855-
863.
13alance Hydrologics, Inc. 1996. Initial Assessment of Pre- and Post-Klamath Project Hydrol-
ogy on the Klamath River and Impacts of the Project on In-Stream Flows and Fisheries
Habitat. 13alance Hydrologics, Inc., 13erkeley, CA. 39 pp.
13altz, D.M., J.W. Fleeger, C.F. Rakocinski, and J.N. McCall. 1998. Food, density, and micro-
habitat: Factors affecting growth and recruitment potential of juvenile saltmarsh fishes.
Environ.13iol. Fish. 53(1):89-103.
13arnhart, R.A. 1994. Salmon and steelhead populations of the Klamath-Trinity 13asin, Cali-
fornia. Pp. 73-97 in Klamath 13asin Fisheries Symposium: Proceedings of a Symposium
held in Eureka, California, 23-24 March 1994, T.J. Hassler, ed. Arcata, CA: California
Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Humboldt State University.
353
OCR for page 354
354
REFERENCES
13artholow, J.M. 1995. Review and Analysis of Klamath River Basin Water Temperatures as a
Factor in the Decline of Anadromous Salmonids with Recommendations for Mitigation.
Final Draft. River Systems Management Section, Midcontinent Ecological Science Cen-
ter, Fort Collins, CO. May 11, 1995. 53 pp.
Beckman, T. 1998. The view from native California: Lifeways of California's indigenous
people. In The Yurok and Hupa of the Northern Coast, Chapter 10. [Online]. Available:
http://www4.hmc.edu: 8001/Humanities/indian/ca/chl 0.htm [accessed Feb. 4, 2003].
13ehnke, R.J. 1992. Native Trout of Western North America. American Fisheries Society
Monograph No. 6.13ethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society. 275 pp.
Bell, E., W.G. Duffy, and T.D. Roelofs. 2001. Fidelity and survival of juvenile coho salmon in
response to a flood. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130(3):450-458.
Bennett, R.A.,13.P. Wernicke, and J.L. Davis. 1998. Continuous GPS measurements of con-
temporary deformation across the northern Basin and Range province. Geophys. Res.
Lett. 25(4):563-566.
Bennett, R.A., J.L. Davis, and UP. Wernicke. 1999. Present-day pattern of Cordilleran defor-
mation in the western United States. Geology 27(4):371-374.
13entivoglio, A.A. 1998. Investigations into the Endemic Sculpins (Cottus princeps, Cottus
tennis), in Oregon's Upper Klamath Lake Watershed, with Information on Other Sculpins
of Interest (C. evermanni, C. spp., and C. "pretender"). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston,
VA. 29 pp.
Fiend, C.S., and J.S. Ziller. 1987. Status of Three Lacustrine Sucker Species (Catostomidae).
Report by the Klamath Tribe, Klamath OR, and Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife to
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, CA. 39 pp.
13isson, P.A., J.L. Nielsen, and J.W. Ward. 1988. Summer production of coho salmon stocked
in Mount St. Helens streams 3-6 years after the 1980 eruption. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.
117:322-335.
Blake, T.A., M.G.13lake, and W. Kittredge. 2000.13alancing Water: Restoring the Klamath
13asin.13erkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13ohnsack, J.A. 1994. Marine reserves: They enhance fisheries, reduce conflicts, and protect
resources. NAGA, ICLARM Quarterly (July):4-7.
Boles, G. L. 1990. Food Habits of Juvenile Wild and Hatchery Steelhead Trout, Oncorhynchus
mykiss, in the Trinity River, California. Inland Fisheries Administrative Report 90-10.
Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. 8 pp.
Bond, C.E., E. Rexstad, and R.M. Hughes. 1988. Habitat use of twenty-five common species
of Oregon freshwater fishes. Northwest Sci. 62(5):223-232.
13ortleson, G.C., and M.O. Fretwell. 1993. A Review of Possible Causes of Nutrient Enrich-
ment and Decline of Endangered Sucker Populations in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon.
Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4087. Portland, OR: U.S. Geological Survey.
24 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/uperklam/ usgs/
usgs93/usgs9301.htm [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Bowers, W., R. Smith., R. Messmer, C. Edwards, and R. Perkins. 1999. Conservation Status of
Oregon Basin Redband Trout. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. [Online]. Avail-
able: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/ODFWhtml/redband.pdf. [accessed June 29, 2003].
13oyd, M., S. Kirk, M. Wiltsey, 13. Kasper, J. Wilson, and P. Leinenbach. 2001. Upper Kla-
math Lake Drainage Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), Draft. Oregon Department
of Environmental Quality, Portland, OR. November 2001.
13oyd, M., S. Kirk, M. Wiltsey, and 13. Kasper. 2002. Upper Klamath Lake Drainage Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). State of
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. May 2002 [Online]. Available: http://
www.deq.state.or.us/wq/TMDLs/UprKlamath/UprKlamathTMDL.pdf [accessed Feb. 4,
2003].
OCR for page 355
REFERENCES
355
13oydstun, L.13., M. Palmer-Zwahlen, and D. Viele. 2001. Pacific salmon. Pp. 407-417 in
California's Living Marine Resources: A Status Report, W.S. Leet, C.M. Dewees, R.
Klingbeil, and E.J. Larson, eds. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and
Game.
Brett, J.R. 1952. Temperature tolerances of young Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus. J. Fish.
Res.13oard Can. 9(6):264-323.
Brown, L.R., P.13. Moyle, and R.M. Yoshiyama. 1994. Historical decline and current status of
coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in California. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 14(2):237-
261.
Buchanan, D.V., M.L. Hanson, and R.M. Hooton. 1997. Status of Oregon's Bull Trout.
Portland, OR: Dept. of Fish and Wildlife.
Suer, K. 1981. Klamath and Shasta Rivers Spawning Gravel Enhancement Study. Northern
District, California Dept. of Water Resources, Red Bluff, CA. 178 pp.
13uettner, M. 1992. Potential Refugial Habitat for Suckers, in Upper Klamath and Agency
Lakes, at Different Lake Elevations (Habitat). Memo KO-750, ENV-4.00 to Files. Au-
gust 27, 1992.
13uettner, M., and G. Scoppettone. 1990. Life History and Status of Catastomids in Upper
Klamath Lake, Oregon: Completion Report (1990). Corvallis, OR: Oregon Dept. of Fish
and Wildlife Service, Fishery Research Division.
13uettner, M.E., and G.G. Scoppettone. 1991. Distribution and Information on the Taxo-
nomic Status of the Shortnose Sucker, Chasmistes brevirostris, and Lost River Sucker,
Deltistes luxatus, in the Klamath River Basin, California. Completion Report. Contract
FG-8304. California Department of Fish and Game, Seattle National Fisheries Research
Center, Reno Substation. 101 pp.
Kohl, K.J., and S.J. Hamilton. 1990. Comparative toxicology of inorganic contaminants re-
leased by placer mining to early life stages of salmonids. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
20:325-342.
Kohl, K.J., and S.J. Hamilton. 1991. Relative sensitivity of early life stages of Arctic grayling,
coho salmon, and rainbow trout to nine inorganics. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 22:184-
197.
Burke, S. 2002. The effects of water allocation decisions on crop revenue in the Klamath
Reclamation Project. Pp. 231-250 in Water Allocation in the Klamath Reclamation
Project, 2001: An Assessment of Natural Resource, Economic, Social, and Institutional
Issues in the Upper Klamath Basin, W.S.13raunworth, Jr., T. Welch, and R. Hathaway,
eds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Service. [Online]. Available:
http://eesc.orst.edu/agcomwebfile/edmat/html/sr/srl 037/srlO37.html [accessed March 10,
2003].
Busby, P.J., T.C. Wainwright, and R.S. Waples. 1994. Status Review for Klamath Mountains
Province Steelhead. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-19. National Ma-
rine Fisheries Service, Seattle, WA. 130 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.nwfsc.noaa.
gov/pubs/tm/tml 9/tml 9.html [accessed Feb. 6, 2003].
CALFED. 2002. Evaluating and Comparing Proposed Water Management Actions, Draft.
CALFED 13ay-Delta Program, Sacramento, CA. February 2002. [Online]. Available:
http://www.calfed.water.ca.gov/13 DPAC/Subcommittees/WMSCEFullReport_020202.pdf
[accessed Feb. 6, 2003].
CALFED 13ay-Delta Program. 2000. Adaptive management process. Pp. 17-22 in Strategic Plan
for Ecosystem Restoration. CALFED 13ay-Delta Program, Sacramento, CA. [Online]. Avail-
able: http://calfed.ca.gov/Programs/EcosystemRestoration/adobe_pdf/ 304c_TOC.pdf [ac-
cessed Feb. 6, 2003].
California Agricultural Statistics Service. 2003. Summary of Annual Production by County.
California Agricultural Statistics Service, State of California, Sacramento, CA.
OCR for page 356
356
REFERENCES
Campbell, E.A., and P.13. Moyle. 1991. Historical and recent population sizes of spring-run
chinook salmon in California. Pp. 155-216 in Proceedings of the 1990 Northeast Pacific
Chinook and Coho Salmon Workshop: Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, Septem-
ber 18-22, 1990, T.J. Hassler, ed. Arcata, CA: California Cooperative Fishery Research
Unit, Humboldt State University.
Campbell, S.G. 1995. Klamath River Basin Flow-Related Scoping Study - Phase I, Water
Quality. In Compilation of Phase I Reports for the Klamath River Basin, May 1995.
Prepared for the Technical Work Group of the Klamath River Basin Fisheries Task
Force by River Systems Management Section, National Biological Service, Midcontinent
Ecological Science Center, Fort Collins, CO.
Campbell, S.G. 2001. Water Quality and Nutrient Loading in the Klamath River Between
Keno, Oregon and Seiad Valley, California from 1996-1998. U.S. Geological Survey
Open File Report 01-301. Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological
Survey. 55 pp.
Carlson, L., D. Simon,13. Shields, and D. Markle. 2002. Interannual Patterns of Ectoparasite
Infestation in Age 0 Klamath Suckers, Poster. Oregon Chapter American Fisheries Soci-
ety Annual Meeting, February 2002, Sunriver, OR.
Castleberry, D.T., and J.J. Cech. 1992. Critical thermal maxima and oxygen minima of five
fishes from the Upper Klamath Basin. Cal. Fish Game Bull. 78:145-152.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1934. Stream Survey: Scott River, Tribu-
tary to Klamath River. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA.
3 pp.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1965. Klamath River Hydrographic Unit.
Pp. 249-271 in North Coastal Area Investigation, Appendix C: Fish and Wildlife. Cali-
fornia Department of Water Resources Bulletin 136. Sacramento, CA: California De-
partment of Fish and Game.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1979a. Salmon River Waterway Manage-
ment Plan. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. 92 pp.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1979b. Scott River Waterway Manage-
ment Plan. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. 121 pp.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1999. Klamath River Basin Fall Chinook
Salmon Spawner Escapement, In-River Harvest and Run-Size Estimates 1978-1999.
California Department of Fish and Game, Trinity River Project Office, Arcata, CA.
[Online]. Available: www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/trtour [accessed August 26, 2003].
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2002. Status Review of California Coho
Salmon North of San Francisco. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission.
Candidate Species Status Review Report 2002-3. 232 pp. [Online]. Available:
http://www.dfg.ca.gov/nafwb/pubs/2002/2002_04_coho_status.pdf [accessed Feb. 6,
2003].
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2003. September 2002 Klamath River
Fishkill Preliminary Analysis of Contributing Factors. State of California, the Resources
Agency, California Department of Fish and Game. 63 pp. [Online]. Available: www.
dfg.ca.gov/html/krfishkill-rpt.pdf [accessed Oct. 7, 2003]
CDWR (California Department of Water Resources). 1964. Shasta Valley Investigation.13ul-
letin No. 87. Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Water Resources.
CDWR (California Department of Water Resources). 1965. North Coastal Area Investiga-
tion. Bulletin No. 136. Sacramento, CA: Dept. of Water Resources.
CDWR (California Department of Water Resources). 1986. Shasta/Klamath Rivers Water
Quality Study. Northern District, Dept. of Water Resources, Red Bluff, CA. [Online].
Available: http://www.krisweb.com/biblio/regional/klamath_trinity/dwr/dwrl.htm [ac-
cessed Feb. 12, 2003].
OCR for page 357
REFERENCES
357
CDWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2002. California Data Exchange Cen-
ter. California Department of Water Resources. [Online]. Available: http://cdec.water.
ca.gov [accessed Feb. 12, 2003].
CERP. 2002. The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). [Online]. Available:
http ://www.evergladesplan. org/about/rest_plan.cfm
Chan, F. 2001. Ecological Controls on Estuarine Planktonic Nitrogen-Fixation: The Roles of
Grazing and Cross-Ecosystem Patterns in Phytoplankton Mortality. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell
University, Ithaca, NY. 288 pp.
Chapin, D.M. 1997. Aerial Photographic Analysis of Exposure and Inundation of Marsh
Vegetation Bordering Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes. Prepared for EA Engineering,
Science, and Technology, Lafayette, CA. March 1997. (as cited in Reiser et al. 2001)
CH2M HILL. 1985. Klamath River Basin Fisheries Resource Plan. Prepared for the Bureau of
Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of Interior, Redding, CA.
CH2M HILL. 1996. Chiloquin Dam Conceptual Design and Cost Estimate for Upstream Fish
Passage Facilities. Prepared for The Nature Conservancy, Portland, OR. March 1996.
Chavez, F.P., J. Ryan, S.E. Lluch-Cota, and C.M. Niquen. 2003. From anchovies to sardines
and back: Multidecadal change in the Pacific Ocean. Science 299(5604):217-221.
Cheever, F. 2001. Recovery planning, the courts and the Endangered Species Act. Nat. Resour.
Environ. 16(2):106-111, 135.
Cnesney, W.R. 2000. Shasta and Scott River Juvenile Steelhead Trapping 2000, Annual Re-
port, Study Sal. California Department of Fish and Game, Steelhead Research and
Monitoring Program, Yreka, CA. December. 37 pp.
Chesney, W.R. 2002. Shasta and Scott River Juvenile Outmigrant Study, 2000-2001, Annual
Report: Project 2al. Steelhead Research and Monitoring Program, California Depart-
ment of Fish and Game, Yreka, CA.
Close, D.A., M.S. Fitzpatrick, and H.W. Li. 2002. The ecological and cultural importance of
a species at risk of extinction, Pacific lamprey. Fisheries 27(7):19-25.
Cobb, J.N. 1930. Pacific Salmon Fisheries. Document No. 1092. U.S. Bureau of Fisheries,
U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Coen, M.A., and R.S. Shively. 2001. Sampling of suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, OR to
identify shoreline spawning sites. In Monitoring of Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in
the Upper Klamath Basin, 2000. Prepared by U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries
Research Center, Klamath Falls Field, Klamath Falls, OR, for the U. S.13ureau of Re-
clamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR. Contract
#OOAA200049.
Coen, M.A., E.C. Janney, R.S. Shively,13.S. Hayes, and G.N.13lackwood. 2002. Monitoring
of Lost River and shortnose suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, Annual Report
2001. Pp. 106-135 in Monitoring of Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in the Upper
Klamath Basin, 2001. Prepared by U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research
Center, Klamath Falls Field, Klamath Falls, OR, for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,
Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR. Contract #OOAA200049.
Colby, 13.G. 1990. Enhancing instream flow benefits in an era of water marketing. Water
Resour. Res. 26(6):1113-1120.
Colby-Saliba,13., and D.13ush. 1987. Water Markets in Theory and Practice: Market Trans-
fer, Water Values, and Public Policy.13oulder, CO: Westview Press.
Coleman, M.E., J. Kann, and G.G. Scoppettone. 1988. Life History and Ecological Investiga-
tions of Catostomids from the Upper Klamath Lake Basin, Oregon. Draft Annual
Report. National Fisheries Research Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Seattle
WA.
Conover, D.O., and S.13. Munch. 2002. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time
scales. Science 297(5578):94-95.
OCR for page 358
358
REFERENCES
Contreras, G.P. 1973. Distribution of Fishes of the Lost River System, California-Oregon,
With a Key to the Species Present. M.S. Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, NV.
Cooperman, M. 2002. Clarification of the Role of Submergent Macrophytes to Larval Short-
nose and Lost River Suckers in the Williamson River and Upper Klamath Lake. Com-
ments sent by Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis,
OR to NRC, Washington, DC. March 7, 2002. 3 pp.
Cooperman, M., and D.F. Markle. 2000. Ecology of Upper Klamath Lake Shortnose and Lost
River suckers. 2. Larval Ecology of Shortnose and Lost River Suckers in the Lower
Williamson River and Upper Klamath Lake. Oregon State University, Department of
Fisheries and Wildlife, Corvallis, OR. 27pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.
gov/kbao/esa/99report2.PDF [accessed March 5, 2003].
Cooperman, M.S., and D.F. Markle. 2003. Endangered species, the Endangered Species Act
and the National Research Council's interim judgment in Klamath basin. Fisheries
28(3):10-19.
Coots, M. 1965. Occurrences of the Lost River sucker, Deltistes luxatus (Cope), and shortnose
sucker, Chasmistes brevirostris (Cope), in northern California. Calif. Fish Game Bull.
51 :68-73.
Cope, E.D. 1879. The fishes of Klamath Lake, Oregon. Am. Nat. 13:784-785.
Crandall, D.R. 1989. Gigantic Debris Avalanche of Pleistocene Age from Ancestral Mount
Shasta Volcano, California, and Debris-Avalanche Hazard Zonation. U.S. Geological
Survey Bulletin 1861. Denver, CO: U.S. G. P.O. 32 pp. [Online]. Available: http://
www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#Shasta River Sub-basin [accessed Oct
9, 2003].
Cressman, L.S. 1956. Klamath Prehistory: The Prehistory of the Klamath Lake Area, Oregon.
Lancaster, PA: Lancaster Press, Inc.
CSWRC13 (California State Water Resources Control Board). 1975. Report on Hydrogeologic
Conditions, Scott River Valley, Scott River Adjudication, Siskiyou County. California
Division of Water Rights, Sacramento, CA. 18 pp.
Cunningham, M.E., and R.S. Shively. 2001. Monitoring report of Lost River and shortnose
suckers in the Lower Williamson River, Oregon, 2000. In Monitoring of Lost River and
Shortnose Suckers in the Upper Klamath Basin, 2000, Annual Report. Prepared by U.S.
Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath Falls Field, Klamath
Falls, OR, for the U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath Area Of-
fice, Klamath Falls, OR. Contract #OOAA200049.
Cunningham, M.E., R.S. Shively, E. C. Janney, and G.N. 13 lackwood. 2002. Monitoring of
Lost River and shortnose suckers in the lower Williamson River, Oregon, 2001. Pp. 1-
36 in Monitoring of Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in the Upper Klamath Basin,
2001. Prepared by U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath
Falls Field, Klamath Falls, OR, for the U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region,
Klamath Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR. Contract #OOAA200049.
Davison, W. 1993. Iron and manganese in lakes. Earth Sci. Rev. 34(2):119-163.
Deas, M.L. 2000. Application of Numerical Water Quality Models in Ecological Assessment.
Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California. Davis, CA. 408 pp.
Desjardins, M., and D.F. Markle. 2000. Distribution and Biology of Suckers in the Lower
Klamath Reservoirs, 1999. Final Report. Prepared for PacifiCorp., Portland, OR, by
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. March
28, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/Finalreport_17.PDF
[accessed March 5, 2003].
Devlin, E.W., and N.K. Mottet. 1992. Embryotoxic action of methyl mercury on coho salmon
embryos. [lull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 49(3):449-454.
OCR for page 359
REFERENCES
359
Dileanis, P.D., S.E. Schwarzbach, J.13ennett, J. Sefchick, R.13oyer, J. Henderson, T. Littleton,
D.E. MacCoy, E. Materna, T. Maurer, D. Mead, and M. Moore. 1996. Detailed Study
of Water Quality, Bottom Sediment, and Rota Associated with Irrigation Drainage in
the Klamath Basin, California and Oregon, 1990-92. Water Resources Investigations
Report 95-4232. U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA. 68 pp. [Online]. Available:
http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/uperklam/usgs/usgs96/usgs96.pdf [accessed
Oct. 3, 2003].
Docker, M.F., J.H. Youson, R.J.13eamish, and R.H. Devlin. 1999. Phylogeny of the lamprey
genus Lampetra inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b and ND3 gene sequences.
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56(12):2340-2349.
Dong, A.E., K.W. 13eatty, and R.C. Averett. 1974. Limnological Study of Lake Shastina,
Siskiyou County, California. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigation Re-
port No. 19-74. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Dowling, T.E. 2000. Conservation Genetics of Endangered Suckers of the Klamath Region:
Mitochondrial DNA. Interim Report. Amendment to Cooperative Agreement 9-FC-20-
17650. Prepared by Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, to
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls, OR. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.
usbr.gov/kbao/esa/99nwsuckreport.pdf [accessed March 5, 2003].
Downton, M.W., and K.A. Miller. 1998. Relationships between Alaskan salmon catch and
North Pacific climate on interannual and interdecadal time scales. Can. J. Fish. Aquat.
Sci. 55(10):2255-2265.
Drake, D., K.W. Tate, and H. Carlson. 2000. Analysis shows climate-caused decreases in
Scott River fall flows. California Agriculture 54(6):46-49.
Dunsmoor, L. 1993. Laboratory Studies of Fathead Minnow Predation on Catostomid Larvae.
Klamath Tribes Research Report KT-93-01. The Klamath Tribes, Chiloquin, OR. 16 pp.
Dunsmoor, L., L.13asdekas,13. Wood, and 13. Peck. 2000. Quantity, Composition and Distri-
bution of Emergent Vegetation along the Lower River and Upper Klamath Lake Shore-
lines of the Williamson River Delta, Oregon. Completion Report. Klamath Tribes,
Chiloquin, OR, and U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office, Klamath
Falls, OR.
Earthinfo, Inc. 1995. U.S. Geological Survey Quality of Water Surface, West 1, 1996. [Online].
Available: http://www.earthinfo.com/.
Echelle, A.A. 1991. Conservation genetics and genie diversity in freshwater fishes of western
North America. Pp. 141-153 in Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management in
the American West, W.L. Minckley and J.E. Deacon, eds. Tucson, AZ: University of
Arizona Press.
Filers, J., J. Kann, J. Cornett, K. Moser, A. St. Amand, and C. Gubala. 2001. Recent Paleo-
limnology of Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Prepared by J.C. Headwaters, Inc., Rosen-
burg, OR, for U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls, OR. March 16, 2001. [On-
line]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/FinalReport23_3-29-01.pdf [accessed
Feb. 25, 2003].
Elder, D.,13. Olson, A. Olson, J. Villeponteaux, and P.13rucker. 2002. Salmon River Subbasin
Restoration Strategy: Steps to Recovery and Conservation of Aquatic Resources. Pre-
pared for The Klamath River Basin Fisheries Restoration Task Force, Yreka Fish and
Wildlife Office, Yreka, CA. 53pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.rS.fs.fed.us/klamath/
mgmt/analysis.html [accessed March 6, 2003].
Elmore, W., and R.L.13eschta. 1987. Riparian areas: Perceptions in management. Rangelands
9:260-265.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. South Fork Trinity River and Hayfork
Creek Sediment Total Maximum Daily Loads. Region 9, U.S. Environmental Protec-
OCR for page 360
360
REFERENCES
tion Agency, San Francisco, CA. [Online]. Available: www.epa.gov/region9/water/tmdl/
fsftmdl.pdf [accessed Oct. 3, 2003].
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Trinity River Total Maximum Daily
Load for Sediment. Region 9, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco,
CA. [Online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/Region9/water/tmdl/trinity/finaltrinitytmdl.
pdf [accessed Oct. 3, 2003].
Falter, M.A., and J. Cech. 1991. Maximum pH tolerance of three Klamath Basin fishes.
Copeia 4:1109-1111.
Fausch, K.D. 1988. Tests of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams:
What have we learned? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:2238-2246.
Fausch, K.D. 1998. Interspecific competition and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): On
testing effects and evaluating the evidence across scales. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55
(suppl. 2):218-231.
Fausch, K.D., C.E. Torgersen, C.V. Baxter, and H.W. Li. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes:
Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience 52
(6):483-498.
FEMAT (Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team). 1993. Forest Ecosystem Man-
agement: An Ecological, Economic, and Social Assessment. U.S. Department of Agricul-
ture, Forest Service, and other agencies, Portland, OR.
Fletcher, K.M., and S.E. O'Shea. 2000. Essential fish habitat: Does calling it essential make it
so? Environ. Law 30(1):51-98.
Foott, J.S. 1997. Results of Histological Examination of Sucker Tissues. Memorandum 1997.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish Health Center, Anderson, CA.
FOTR (Friends of the Trinity River). 2003. Trinity Division History, Restoration Program
Projects and Costs. Friends of the Trinity River, Mill Valley, CA. [Online]. Available:
www.fotr.org/history6.html [accessed August 26, 2003].
Franzius, A. 1997. California Gold: The Diary and Letters of James M. Burr, 1850-
1853. The Digital Scriptorium. Special Collections Library, Duke University. [On-
line]. Available: http://www.duke.edu/~agf2/history391/index.html [accessed Feb.13,
2003].
Fuller, P.L., L.G. Nico, and J.D. Williams. 1999. Nonindigenous Fishes Introduced Into
Inland Waters of the United States. Special Pub. No. 27. Bethesda, MD: American
Fisheries Society.
Gabrielson, I.N. 1943. Wildlife Refuges. New York: Macmillan.
Gahler, A.R., and W.D. Sanville. 1971. Lake sediments: Characterization of Lake Sediments
and Evaluation of Sediment-Water Nutrient Interchange Mechanisms in the Upper Kla-
math Lake System: Lake Sediments. Corvallis, OR: Pacific Northwest Water Labora-
tory. 40 pp.
Gale, D.13., T.R. Hayden, L.S. Harris, and H.N. Voight. 1998. Assessment of Anadromous
Fish Stocks in Blue Creek, Lower Klamath River, California, 1994-1996. Yurok Tribal
Fisheries Program, Habitat Assessment and Biological Monitoring Division Technical
Report 4. April 1998. 101 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_
kt/biblio/biblio.htm#General Methods [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Ganf, G.G. 1983. An ecological relationship between Aphanizomenon and Daphnia pulex.
Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 34(5):755-773.
Ganf, G.G., and R.L. Oliver. 1982. Vertical separation of light and available nutrients as a
factor causing replacement of green algae by blue-green algae in the plankton of a
stratified lake. J. Ecol. 70(3):829-844.
Gearheart, R.A., J.K. Anderson, M.G. Forbes, M. Osburn, and D. Oros. 1995. Watershed
Strategies for Improving Water Quality in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, Vol. 2. Pre-
pared for Klamath Basin Area Office, U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, by Humboldt State
University, Arcata, CA. 270 pp.
OCR for page 361
REFERENCES
361
Geiger, N.S. 2001. Reassociating Wetlands with Upper Klamath Lake to Improve Water
Quality. Presented at Klamath Fish and Water Management Symposium, May 22-25,
2001, Arcata, CA.
Getches, D.H. 2003. Constrains of law and policy on the management of western water. Pp.
183-234 in Water and Climate in the Western United States, W.M. Lewis, ed. Boulder,
CO: University Press of Colorado.
Gilbert, C.H. 1898. The Fishes of the Klamath 13asin.13ulletin of the United States Fisheries
Commission 17:1-13. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/ biblio/
biblio.htm#General Methods [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Gillilan, D.M., and T.C. Brown. 1997. Instream Flow Protection: Seeking Balance under
Western Water Use. Covelo, CA: Island Press. 417 pp.
Golden, M.P. 1969. The Lost River Sucker. Oregon Game Commission Administrative Re-
port. No. 1-69. 11 pp.
Gordon, C. 1883. Report on Cattle, Sheep, and Swine, Supplementary to Enumeration of
Live Stock on Farms in 1880. In Report on the Production of Agriculture as Returned at
the Tenth Census (June 1, 1880): Embracing General Statistics and Monographs on
Cereal Production, Flour-Milling, Tobacco Culture, Manufacture and Movement of To-
bacco, Meat Production. Tenth Census of the United States, 1880, Vol. 3. Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Griffiths, D. 1902. Forage Conditions on the Northern Border of the Great 13asin,13eing a
Report Upon Investigations Made During July and August, 1901, in the Region 13e-
tween Winnemucca, Nevada, and Ontario, Oregon. U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Bureau of Plant Industry Bulletin No. 15. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office.
Grumbine, R.E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conserv.13iol. 8(1):27-38.
Gutermuth, 13., D. 13eckstrand, and C. Watson. 1998. New Earth Harvest Site Monitoring,
1996-1997. Final Report. New Earth/Cell Technology, Klamath Falls, OR.
Gutermuth,13., E. Pinkston, and D. Vogel. 2000. A-Canal Fish Entrainment During 1997 and
1998 with Emphasis on Endangered Suckers. Prepared for U.S.13ureau of Reclamation,
by New Earth/Cell Tech, Klamath Falls, OR, and Natural Resource Scientists, Inc., Red
Bluff, CA.
Gwynne,13.A. 1993. Investigation of Water Quality Conditions in the Shasta River, Siskiyou
County. Interim Report. California Regional Water Quality Control 13 oard, Santa
Rosa, CA. September 20, 1993. 28 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/
krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#Shasta River Sub-basin [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Haley, K.13. 1990. Operational research and management in fishing. Pp. 3-7 in Operations
Research and Management in Fishing, A.G. Rodrigues, ed. NATO ASI Series F: Applied
Sciences Vol. 189. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hanna, R.13., and S.G. Campbell. 2000. Water Quality Modeling in the System Impact As-
sessment Model for the Klamath River Basin - Keno, Oregon to Seiad Valley, Califor-
nia. USGS Open File Report 99-113. U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO. 84 pp.
Hardy, T.13., and R.C. Addley. 2001. Evaluation of Interim Instream Flow Needs in the
Klamath River: Phase 2. Final Report. Institute for Natural Systems Engineering, Utah
Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
Hare, S.R., N.J. Mantua, and R.C. Francis. 1999. Fisheries habitat-inverse production re-
gimes: Alaska and west coast Pacific salmon. Fisheries 24(1):6-14.
Harris, G.P. 1986. Phytoplankton Ecology: Structure, Function and Fluctuation. London:
Chapman and Hall Ltd.
Hart, D.D., and N.L. Poff. 2002. A special section on dam removal and river restoration.
Bioscience 52(8):653-655.
Harvey, 13.C., and R.J. Nakamoto. 1996. Effects of steelhead density on growth of coho
salmon in a small coastal stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 125(2):237-243.
OCR for page 362
362
REFERENCES
Havens, K.E., E.J. Phlips, M.F. Cichra, and ILL. Li. 1998. Light availability as a possible
regulator of cyanobacteria species composition in a shallow subtropical lake. Freshwater
Viol. 39(3):547-556.
Hayden, T.R., and D.13. Gale. 1999. Juvenile Salmonid Emigration Monitoring from the
Hunter Creek Basin, Lower Klamath River, California, 1996-1997. Yurok Tribal Fish-
eries Program, Habitat Assessment.13iological Monitoring Division Technical Report 6.
63 pp.
Hayes,13.S., R.S. Shively, E.C. Janney, and G.N.13lackwood. 2002. Monitoring of Lost River
and shortnose suckers at shoreline spawning areas in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Pp.
37-78 in Monitoring of Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in the Upper Klamath Basin,
2001. Prepared by U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath
Falls Field, Klamath Falls, OR, for the U. S.13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region,
Klamath Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR. Contract #OOAA200049
Haynal, P. 2000. Termination and tribal survival: The Klamath Tribes of Oregon. Oreg. Hist.
Quart. 101(3):271-301.
Healey, M.H. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pp. 311-
393 in Pacific Salmon Life Histories, C. Groot and L. Margolis, eds. Vancouver, 13C,
Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
Heinz (H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment). 2002. Dam
Removal: Science and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The H. J. Heinz III Center for
Science, Economics, and the Environment. [Online]. Available: http://www.heinzctr. org/
publications.htm [accessed Feb.14, 2003].
Heizer, R.F. 1978. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8. California. Washington,
DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Helfman, G.S., and E.T. Schultz. 1984. Social transmission of behavioral traditions in a coral
reef fish. Anim.13ehav. 32:379-384.
Henshaw, F.F., and H.J. Dean. 1915. Surface Water Supply of Oregon: 1878-1910. Water
Supply Paper 370. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hicks, M. 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington's Surface
Water Quality Standards Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature
Summary. Pub. No. 00-10-070. Washington State Department of Ecology, Water Qual-
ity Program, Watershed Management Section, Olympia, WA. [Online]. Available: http://
www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0010070.html [accessed Oct. 7, 2003].
Hilborn, R., and J. Winton. 1993. Learning to enhance salmon production: Lessons from the
salmonid enhancement program. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:2043-2056.
Hobday, A.J., and G.W. 13oehlert. 2001. The role of coastal ocean variation in spatial and
temporal patterns in survival and size of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can. J.
Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58(10):2021-2036.
Hoglund, P. 2003. Keep it real for Klamath Basin trout, Oregon fishing map feature. Fishing
and Hunting News, ESPN Outdoors. [Online]. Available: http://www.espn.go.com/
outdoors/fishing/s/f_map_OR_Klamath_basin.html [accessed June 29, 2003].
Holling, C.S., ed. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York:
Wiley.
Holt, R. 1997. Upper Klamath Lake Fish Disease Exam Report. RH-96-126. Oregon Depart-
ment of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis, OR.
Hopelain, J.S. 1998. Age, Growth, and Life History of Klamath River Basin Steelhead Trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus) as Determined from Scale Analysis. Inland Fisheries Ad-
ministration Report 98-3. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA.
19 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#
General Methods [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Hopelain, J.S. 2001. Lower Klamath River Angler Creel Census with Emphasis on Upstream
Migrating Fall Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, and Steelhead Trout during July through
OCR for page 363
REFERENCES
363
October, 1983 through 1987. Inland Fisheries Administration Report 2001-1. Califor-
nia Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA. 79 pp.
Home, A.J. 2002. 2001 Data Summary Report. Limnological Survey During August 2001 in
Support of the Pilot Oxygenation Project Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Findings and
Recommendations for the Prevention of Fish Kills and the Restoration of the Lake.
Prepared for the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific
Region, Klamath, OR, in association with 13urleson Consulting, Inc., El Cerrito, CA.
Houde, E.D. 1987. Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability. Pp. 17-29 in 10th
Annual Larval Fish Conference: Proceedings, May 18-23, 1986, Miami, FL, R.D. Hoyt,
ed. American Fisheries Symposium 2.13ethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
Houde, E.D. 1997. Patterns and consequences of selective processes in teleost early life histo-
ries. Pp. 173-196 in Early Life History and Recruitment in Fish Populations, R.C. Cham-
bers and E.A. Trippel, eds. London: Chapman and Hall.
Howarth, R.W., F. Chan, and R. Marino. 1999. Do top-down and bottom-up controls inter-
act to exclude nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria from the plankton of estuaries? An explora-
tion with a simulation model. lliogeochemistry 46(1/3):203-231.
Hughes, R.M., and J.R. Gammon. 1987. Longitudinal changes in fish assemblages and water
quality in the Willamette River, Oregon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 116:196-209.
Hughes, R.M., P.R. Kaufman, A.T. Herlihy, T.M. Kincaid, L. Reynolds, and D.P. Larsen.
1998. A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity. Can.
J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55(7):1618-1631.
Hydrosphere Data Products, Inc. 1993. Hydro data Regional CD-ROMS: U.S. Geological Sur-
vey Daily Values, Vols. West 1, West 2. Hydrosphere Data Products, Inc.,13oulder, CO.
ILM (Integrated Land Management Working Group). 2000. Integrated Land Management on
Lake National Wildlife Refuge: An Alternate Strategy Developed by the Integrated Land
Management Working Group. October 30, 2000. 30 pp.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2001. Working Group I. Climate Change
2001: The Scientific 13asis. [Online]. Available: http://www.unep.ch/ipcc/. [accessed Feb.
14, 2003].
Ishida, Y., T. Hariu, J. Yamashiro, S. McKinnell, T. Matsuda, and H. Kaneko. 2001. Ar-
chaeological evidence of Pacific salmon distribution in northern Japan and implications
for future global warming. Progr. Oceanogr. 49(1):539-550.
Jaeger, W.K. 2002. Water allocation alternatives for the upper Klamath basin. Pp. 365-391
in Water Allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: An Assessment of Natu-
ral Resource, Economic, Social, and Institutional Issues in the Upper Klamath 13asin,
W.S. 13raunworth, Jr., T. Welch, and R. Hathaway, eds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon
State University Extension Service. [Online]. Available: http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/
agcomwebfile/edmat/html/sr/srlO37/alternatives.pdf [accessed March 10, 2003].
Janney, E.C., R. Shively, and G.N.13lackwood. 2002. Monitoring of Lost River and shortnose
suckers at the Sprague River Dam Fish Ladder, Oregon. Pp. 79-105 in Monitoring of
Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in the Upper Klamath 13asin, 2001. Prepared by U.S.
Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath Falls Field, Klamath
Falls, OR, for the U. S. 13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath Area
Office, Klamath Falls, OR. Contract #OOAA200049.
Jennings, C.A., J.L. Shelton,13.J. Freeman, and G.L. Looney. 1998. Culture Techniques and
Ecological Studies of the Robust Redhorse, Moxostoma robustum: Assessment of Re-
productive and Recruitment Success and Incubation Temperatures and Flows, 1996
Annual Report. Prepared for Georgia Power Co., Environmental Affairs Division, At-
lanta, GA.
Jessup, L.T. 1927. Report on Proposed Reflooding of a Portion of Lower Klamath Lake
California. Oregon State University Archives. William L. Finley Papers,13Ox 7, Klamath-
Reclamation 1934-1935 folder.
OCR for page 368
368
REFERENCES
Mortimer, C.H. 1941. The exchange of dissolved substances between mud and water in lakes.
J. Ecol. 29(2):280-329.
Mortimer, C.H. 1942. The exchange of dissolved substances between mud and water in lakes.
J. Ecol. 30(1):147-201.
Mount, J.F. 1995. California Rivers and Streams: The Conflict between Fluvial Processes and
Land Use.13erkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Moyle, P.13. 2002. Inland Fishes of California.13erkeley, CA: University of California Press.
502 pp.
Moyle, P.13., and R.A. Leidy. 1992. Loss of biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems: Evidence from
fish faunas. Pp. 127-169 in Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature
Conservation, Preservation and Management, P.L. Fiedler and S.K. Jain, eds. New York:
Chapman and Hall.
Moyle, P.13., and T. Light. 1996. Biological invasions of fresh water: Empirical rules and
assembly theory. Viol. Conserv. 78(1):149-161.
Moyle, P.13., R.M. Yoshiyama, J.E. Williams, and E.D. Wikramanayake. 1995. Fish Species
of Special Concern of California, 2nd Ed. California Department of Fish and Game,
Sacramento, CA.
Mueller, G., and P. Marsh. 1995.13onytail and razorback sucker in the Colorado River Basin.
In Our Living Resources, a Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance, and
Health of U.S. Plants, Animals, and Ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, Na-
tional Biological Service. [Online]. Available: http://biology.usgs.gov/s+t/noframe/rl66.
htm [accessed Oct. 3, 2003].
Myers, J.M., R.G. Kope, G.J.13ryant, D. Teel, L.J. Lierheimer, T.C. Wainwright, W. S. Grant,
F.W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S.T. Lindley, and R.S. Waples. 1998. Status Review of Chinook
Salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA Technical Memoran-
dum NMFS-NWFSC-35. National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and At-
mospheric Administration, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Seattle, WA. 443 pp. [Online].
Available: http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications/techmemos/tm35/index.htm [ac-
cessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Myrick, C.A., and J.J. Cech, Jr. 2001. Temperature Effects on Chinook Salmon and Steel-
head: A Review Focusing on California's Central Valley Populations. Technical Publica-
tion 01-1. Sacramento, CA: 13ay-Delta Modeling Forum. [Online]. Available: http://www.
cnr.colostate.edu/~camyrick/Publications.html [accessed Feb. 28, 2003].
Nagle, J.C., and J.13. Ruhl. 2002. The Law of 13iodiversity and Ecosystem Management.
Foundation Press. New York: Foundation Press.
NAST (National Assessment Synthesis Team). 2001. Climate Change Impacts on the United
States: Foundation Report: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and
Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 618 pp.
Nelson, 13. 1988. Our Home Forever: The Hupa Indians of Northern California. Salt Lake
City, UT: Howe Brothers Press.
Nickelson, T.E., M.F. Solazzi, and S.L. Johnson. 1986. Use of hatchery coho salmon (On-
corhynchus kisutch) presmolts to rebuild wild populations in Oregon coastal streams.
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43:2443-2449.
Nickelson, T.E., M.F. Solazzi, J.D. Rodgers, and S.L. Johnson. 1992a. Effectiveness of se-
lected stream improvement techniques to create suitable summer and winter rearing
habitat for juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Oregon coastal streams.
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49(4):790-794.
Nickelson, T.E., J.D. Rodgers, S.L. Johnson, and M.F. Solazzi. 1992b. Seasonal changes in
habitat use by juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Oregon coastal streams.
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49(4):783-789.
OCR for page 369
REFERENCES
369
NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2001.13iological Opinion. Ongoing Klamath Project
Operations. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Region, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Long Beach, CA. April 6, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://
www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/38_cohobo_4_6-01.pdf [accessed March 5, 2003].
NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2002.13iological Opinion. Klamath Project Op-
erations. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Region, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Long Beach, CA. May 31, 2002. [Online]. Available:
http://swr.ucsd.edu/psd/kbo.pdf; also available through the National Research Councils
Public Access File
NRC (National Research Council). 1992. Water Transfers in the West: Efficiency, Equity,
and the Environment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Science and the Endangered Species Act. Washing-
ton, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific North-
west. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 242 pp.
NRC (National Research Council). 1999. Downstream: Adaptive Management of Glen Can-
yon Dam and the Colorado River Ecosystem. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 2001. Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key
Questions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Scientific Evaluation of Biological Opinions on
Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin. Interim Report. Wash-
ington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2003. Environmental Quality Incentives
Program. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
[Online]. Available: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/eqip/ [accessed June 24, 2003].
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1982. Eutrophication
of Waters: Monitoring, Assessment and Control. Paris, France: OECD.
Ogden, P.S. 1971. Snake Country Journals, 1827-28 and 1828-29, G. Williams, ed. Publica-
tions of the Hudson's Bay Record Society 28. London: Hudson's Bay Record Society.
Olson, A.D., and O.J. Dix. 1993. Lower Salmon River Sub-13asin Fish Habitat Condition and
Utilization Assessment 1990/1991. Final Report. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Ser-
vice, Klamath National Forest, Yreka, CA. 41 pp.
O'Neal, K. 2002. Effects of Global Warming on Trout and Salmon in U. S. Streams. Defend-
ers of Wildlife and Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC. [Online].
Available: http://www.defenders.org/publications/fishreport.pdf [accessed Feb. 24, 2003].
OWRD (Oregon Water Resources Department. 2000. Resolving the Klamath: Klamath Basin
Adjudication. Oregon Water Resources Department, Salem, OR. [Online]. Available:
http://www.wrd.state.or.us/programs/klamath/summary/textonly.shtml [accessed Feb.
24, 2003].
PCFFA (Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman's Associations). 2002. Myths and Facts about
the Klamath Water Issues. Klamath Basin Water Issues, Economic Impacts and Salmon
Recovery. Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman's Associations. [Online]. Available:
http://www.pcffa.org/kl-myths.htm [accessed July 1, 2003].
PacifiCorp. 2000. Klamath Hydroelectric Project. First Stage Consultation Document. FERC
Project No. 2082. PacifiCorp, Portland, OR. December 15, 2000.
Pacific Watershed Associates. 1994. Action Plan for Restoration of the South Fork Trinity
River Watershed and its Fisheries. Prepared for U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the
Trinity River Task Force. Contract No. 2-CS-20-01100. Pacific Watershed Associates,
Arcata, CA. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/biblio/general/pwa/pwa23.
htm [accessed Feb. 25, 2003].
OCR for page 370
370
REFERENCES
Parson, E.A., P.W. Mote, A. Hamlet, N. Mantua, A. Snover, W. Keeton, E. Miles, D. Can-
ning, and K.G. Ideker. 2001. Potential consequences of climate variability and change
for the Pacific Northwest. Pp. 247-280 in Climate Change Impacts on the U.S., the
Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. National Assessment Syn-
thesis Team, U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC. [Online]. Avail-
able: http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/Library/nationalassessment/09PNW.pdf [accessed
March 8, 2003].
Pearcy, W.G. 1992. Ocean Ecology of North Pacific Salmonids. Washington Sea Grant Pro-
gram, University of Washington Press, Seattle. 179 pp.
Pearsons, T.N., and C.W. Hopley. 1999. Fisheries management: A practical approach for
assessing ecological risks associated with fish stocking programs. Fisheries 24(9):16-23.
Perkins, D.L., and G.G. Scoppettone. 1996. Spawning and Migration of Lost River Suckers
(Deltistes luxatus) and Shortnose Suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) in the Clear Lake
Drainage, Modoc County, California. National Biological Service California Science
Center, Reno Field Station, Reno, NV. 52 pp.
Perkins, D., G.G. Scoppettone, and M. 13uettner. 2000a. Reproductive Biology and Demo-
graphics of Endangered Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake,
Oregon. Report to the Bureau of Reclamation. Reno, NV, by U.S. Geological Survey-
13iological Resources Division, Western Fisheries Science Center, Reno Field Station,
Reno, NV. 52 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/UKL%20
SPAWNING-REPORT%20VERSION.pdf [accessed March 5, 2003].
Perkins, D.J., J. Kann, and G.G. Scoppettone. 2000b. The Role of Poor Water Quality and
Fish Kills in the Decline of Endangered Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in the Upper
Klamath Lake. Final Report. Contract 4-AA-29-12160. Prepared for the U.S.13ureau of
Reclamation, Klamath Falls Project Office, Klamath Falls, OR, by U.S. Geological Sur-
vey, Biological Resources Division, Western Fisheries Science Center, Reno Field Station,
Reno, NV. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/Fish_Kill.pdf [accessed
Feb. 25, 2003].
Pierce, R. 1991. The Lower Klamath fishery: Recent times. Pp. 142-150 in California's
Salmon and Steelhead: A Struggle to Restore an Imperiled Resource, A. Lufkin, ed.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Plunkett, S.R., and E. Snyder-Conn. 2000. Anomalies of Larval and Juvenile Shortnose and
Lost River Suckers in the Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Klamath Falls, OR. 26 pp.
Poff, N.L., J.D. Allan, M.13.13ain, J.R. Karr, K.L. Prestegaard,13.D. Richter, R.E. Sparks, and
J.C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and
restoration. Bioscience 47(11):769-784.
Poff, N.L., J.D. Allan, M.A. Palmer, D.D. Hart,13.D. Richter, A.H. Arthington, K.H. Rogers,
J.L. Meyer, and J.A. Stanford. 2003. River flows and water wars: Emerging science for
environmental decision making. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1(6): 298-306.
Power, J.H. 2001. Letters: Scott River flows. California Agriculture 55(2):4.
Prager, M.H., and M.S. Mohr. 2001. The harvest rate model for Klamath River fall chinook
salmon, with management applications and comments on model development and docu-
mentation. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21(3):533-547.
PWA (Philip Williams & Associates). 2001. Evaluation of Proposed Lake Management on
Hydrodynamics, Water Quality and Eutrophication in Upper Klamath Lake. Report
PWA #1412. Prepared by Philip Williams & Associates, Portland, OR, and Corte
Madera, CA, for U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls, OR. [Online]. Available:
http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/UKL-Report26_3-29-01.pdf [accessed March 5,
2003].
Railsback, S.F., and 13.C. Harvey. 2001. Individual-13ased Model Formulation for Cutthroat
Trout, Little Jones Creek, California. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-182. Pa-
OCR for page 371
REFERENCES
371
cific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Albany,
CA. 80 pp.
Rantz, S.E. 1972. Runoff Characteristics of California Streams. U.S. Geological Survey Wa-
ter-Supply Paper No. 2009-A. Washington, DC: U.S. Goernment Printing Office.
Ratliff, D.E., and P.J. Howell. 1992. The status of bull trout populations in Oregon. Pp. 10-
17 in Proceedings of the Gearhart Mountain Bull Trout Workshop, P.J. Howell, and
D.V.13uchanan, eds. Corvallis, OR: American Fisheries Society.
Redmond, K.T. 2003. Climate variability in the west: Complex spatial structure associated
with topography, and observational issues. Pp. 29-49 in Water and Climate in the
Western United States, W.M. Lewis, ed. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
Reiser, D.W., M. Loftus, D. Chapman, E. Jeanes, and K. Oliver. 2001. Effects of Water
Quality and Lake Level on the Biology and Habitat of Selected Fish Species in Upper
Klamath Lake. Prepared for the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Reynolds, C.S. 1971. The ecology of the planktonic blue-green algae in the north Shropshire
meres. Field Studies 3:409-432.
Reynolds, C.S. 1984. The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Reynolds, C.S. 1993. Scales of disturbance and their role in plankton ecology. Hydrobiologia
249(1/3):157-171.
Rhodes, J.S., and T.P. Quinn. 1998. Factors affecting the outcome of territorial contests
between hatchery and naturally reared coho salmon parr in the laboratory. J. Fish Viol.
53(6):1220-1230.
Ricker, S.J. 1997. Evaluation of Salmon and Steelhead Spawning Habitat Quality in the
Shasta River Basin, 1997. Inland Fisheries Administrative Report No. 97-9. Sacramento,
CA: California Dept. of Fish and Game. 13 pp.
Risley, J.C., and A. Laenen. 1999. Upper Klamath Lake Basin Nutrient Loading Study-
Assessment of Historic Flows in the Williamson and Sprague Rivers. Survey Water
Resources Investigation Report 98-4198. Portland, OR: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S.
Dept. of Interior. 22 pp.
Robins, C.R., and R.R. Miller. 1957. Classification, variation, and distribution of the sculpins,
genus Cottus, inhabiting Pacific slope waters in California and southern Oregon, with a
key to the species. Calif. Fish Game Bull. 43(3):213-233.
Ruhl,J.13. 1995. Section 7(a)(1) of the "new" Endangered Species Act: Rediscovering and
redefining the untapped power of federal agencies' duty to conserve species. Environ.
Law 25(4):1107-1163.
Ruhl, J.13. 2000. Ecosystem management, the ESA, and the seven degrees of relevance. Nat.
Resour. Environ. 14:156-161.
Ruppert, J.13., R.T. Muth, and T.P. Nesler. 1993. Predation on fish larvae by adult red
shiner, Yampa and Green rivers, Colorado. The Southwestern Naturalist 38(4):397-
399.
Russell, I.C. 1903. Notes on the Geology of Southwestern Idaho and Southeastern Oregon.
Bulletin No. 217. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ruzycki, J.R., D.A. 13eauchamp, and D.L. Yule. 2003. Effects of introduced lake trout on
native cutthroat trout in Yellowstone Lake. Ecol. Appl. 13(1):23-37.
Saiki, M.K., D.P. Monda, and ILL. 13ellerud. 1999. Lethal levels of selected water quality
variables to larval and juvenile Lost River and shortnose suckers. Environ. Pollut.
105(1):37-44.
Salmon River Restoration Council. 2002. Salmon River Restoration Council, Sawyers par,
CA. [Online]. Available: http://www.srrc.org/ [accessed Feb. 26, 2003].
Sandercock, F.K. 1991. Life history of coho salmon. Pp. 395-446 in Pacific Salmon Life
Histories, C. Groot, and L. Margolis, eds. Vancouver: University of British Columbia
Press.
OCR for page 372
372
REFERENCES
Schindler, D.W., R.W. Newbury, K.G. 13eatty, and P. Campbell. 1976. Natural water and
chemical budgets for a small Precambrian lake basin in central Canada. J. Fish. Res.
Board Can. 33:2526-2543.
Scoppettone, G.G. 1986. Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, Catostomid Research. Completion
report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Fisheries Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Scoppettone, G.G. 1988. Growth and longevity of the Cui-ui and longevity of other
catostomids and cyprinids in western North America. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 117: 301-
307.
Scoppettone, G.G., and G.L. Vinyard. 1991. Life history and management of four endangered
lacustrine suckers. Pp. 359-377 in Battle Against Extinction: Native Fish Management
in the American West, W.L. Minckley and J.E. Deacon, eds. Tucson, AZ: University of
Arizona Press.
Scoppettone, G.G., S. Shea, and M.E.13uettner. 1995. Information on Population Dynamics
and Life History of Shortnose Suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) and Lost River Suckers
(Deltistes luxatus) in Tule and Clear Lakes. National Biological Service, Reno Field
Station, Reno, NV.
Scott River Watershed Coordinated Resource Management Planning Council. 1997. Scott
River Watershed Fish Population and Habitat Plan. Scott River Watershed Coordinated
Resource Management Planning Council, Etna, CA. 25 pp.
Shively, R.S., A.E. Kohler, 13.J. Peck, M.A. Coen, and 13.S. Hayes. 2000a. Water Quality,
13enthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Community Monitoring in the Lost River Sub-
basin, Oregon and California, 1999. Annual Report 1999. U.S. Geological Survey,13io-
logical Resources Division, Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath Falls Duty Sta-
tion, Klamath Falls, OR, Johnson Controls Wold Services Inc. NERC Operation, Fort
Collins, CO, and U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath Falls Area
Office, Klamath Falls, OR. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/
Lostriverrpt.pdf [accessed March 5, 2003].
Shively, R.S., E.13. Neuman, A.E. Kohler, and 13.J. Peck. 2000b. Species composition and
distribution of fishes in the Lost River, Oregon. Pp. 72-92 in Water Quality, 13enthic
Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Community Monitoring in the Lost River Sub-basin, Or-
egon and California, 1999. Annual Report 1999, R.S. Shively, A.E. Kohler, 13.J. Peck,
M.A. Coen, and 13.S. Hayes, eds. U.S. Geological Survey,13iological Resources Division,
Western Fisheries Research Center, Klamath Falls Duty Station, Klamath Falls, OR,
Johnson Controls Wold Services Inc. NERC Operation, Fort Collins, CO, and U.S.
13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath Falls Area Office, Klamath Falls,
OR. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/Lostriverrpt.pdf [accessed
March 5, 2003].
5~mon, D.C., and D.F. Markle. 1997a. Inter-annual abundance of non-native fathead minnows
(Pimephales promelas) in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Great 13asin Nat. 57:142-148.
Simon, D.C., and D.F. Markle. 1997b. Larval and Juvenile Ecology of Upper Klamath Lake
Suckers, Annual Report: 1996. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State Uni-
versity, Corvallis, OR.
Simon, D.C., and D.F. Markle. 2001. Ecology of Upper Klamath Lake Shortnose and Lost
River suckers. Annual Survey of Abundance and Distribution of Age 0 Shortnose and
Lost River Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Annual Report: 2000. Oregon Cooperative
Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Corvallis, OR.
Simon, D.C., G.R. Hoff, D.J. Logan, and D.F. Markle. 1996. Larval and Juvenile Ecology of
Upper Klamath Lake Suckers. Annual Report: 1995. Department of Fisheries and Wild-
life, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 60 pp.
Simon, D.C., M.R. Terwilliger, P. Murtaugh, and D.F. Markle. 2000. Larval and Juvenile
Ecology of Upper Klamath Lake Suckers: 1995-1998. Final Report. Prepared by Oregon
State University, Corvallis, OR, for U.S. 13ureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls, OR.
OCR for page 373
REFERENCES
373
January 7, 2000. 108 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/95-
98report_4.pdf [accessed March 5, 2003].
Simpson, P.K. 1987. The Community of Cattlemen: A Social History of the Cattle Industry in
Southeastern Oregon 1869-1912. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Press.
Smith, J.J., and H.W. Li. 1983. Energetic factors influencing foraging tactics of juvenile
steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri. Pp. 173-180 in Predators and Prey in Fishes, D.L.G.
Noakes, D.G. Lindquist, G.S. Helfman, and J.A. Ward, eds. The Hague: W. Junk.
Snyder, D.T., and J.L. Morace. 1997. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loading from Drained Wet-
lands Adjacent to Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon. Water-Resources Investi-
gations Report 97-4059. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
67 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#
Upper Klamath Basin [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Snyder, J.O. 1931. Salmon of the Klamath River, California. California Department of Fish
and Game Bulletin 34. Sacramento, CA: California State Print. Off. 130 pp. [Online].
Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#General Methods [ac-
cessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Snyder, J.O. 1933. A steelhead migration in the Shasta River. Calif. Fish Game Bull. 19(4):
252-254.
Snyder, M.A., J.L.13ell, L.C. Sloan, P.13. Duffy, and 13. Govindasamy. 2002. Climate responses
to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide for a climatically vulnerable region. Geo-
phys. Res. Lett. 29(11):9.
Sommerstram, S., E. Kellogg, and J. Kellogg. 1990. Scott River Watershed Granitic Sediment
Study. Prepared by Tierra Data Systems, for Siskiyou Resource Conservation District,
Etna, CA. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#
Scott River Sub-basin [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Sorte, 13., and 13. Wyse. In press. The Lower Klamath Basin Economy and the Roles of
Agriculture and Commercial Fishing. Special Report. Oregon State University Extension
Service, Corvallis, OR.
SRCD (Siskiyou Resource Conservation District). 2001. Water Temperatures in the Scott
River Watershed in Northern California. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Etna, CA. 49 pp.
Stern, M.A. 1990. Strategies for Improving Fish Passage for the Lost River and Shortnose
Sucker at the Chiloquin Dam. Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field
Station, Sacramento, CA, by Oregon Natural Heritage Program, The Nature Conser-
vancy, Portland, OR. November.
Stern, T. 1965. The Klamath Tribe: A People and Their Reservation. Seattle, WA: University
of Washington Press. 356 pp.
Strzepek, K.M., and D.N. Yates. 2003. Assessing effects of climate change on the water
resources of the western United States. Pp. 93-106 in Water and Climate in the Western
United States, W.M. Lewis, ed. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
Stubbs, K., and R. White. 1993. Lost River (Deltistes luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes
brevirostris) Sucker Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
Taft, A.C., and L. Shapovalov. 1935. A Biological Survey of Streams and Lakes in the Kla-
math and Shasta National Forests in California. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Commerce,13ureau of Fisheries.
Thomas, J.W., and the Scientific Analysis Team. 1993. Viability Assessments and Manage-
ment Considerations for Species Associated with Late-Successional and Old-Growth
Forests of the Pacific Northwest. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National
Forest System, Forest Service Research. 530 pp.
Thompson, D.E., J.E. Lauman, J.D. Fortune, and R. Todd. 1989. Controlled Grazing for
Riparian Zone Rehabilitation. Oregon State University Extension Office, Klamath Falls,
OR. 99 pp.
OCR for page 374
374
REFERENCES
Thornton, R.D. 2001. Habitat conservation plans: Frayed safety nets or creative partner-
ships? Nat. Resour. Environ. 16(2):94-101.
Thurman, E.M. 1985. Organic Geochemistry of Natural Waters. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.
Tranah, G.J. 2001. Molecular Genetic Analysis of Hybridization and Population Structure in
Endangered Sturgeon and Sucker Species. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California,
Davis, CA.
Trihey and Associates, Inc. 1996. Instream Flow Requirements for Tribal Trust Species in the
Klamath River. Prepared by Trihey and Associates, Inc., Concord, CA, for the Yurok
Tribe, Eureka, CA. 43 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/
biblio/biblio.htm#General Methods [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Trippel, E.A. 1995. Age at maturity as a stress indicator in fisheries. Bioscience 45(11):759-
771.
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 1994.13iological Assessment on Long-Term Operations
of the Klamath Project, with Special Emphasis on Clear Lake Operations. U.S.13ureau of
Reclamation, Klamath 13asin Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR.
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 1999.13athymetry of Upper Klamath and Agency Lake
provided in GIS format. U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath 13a-
sin Area Office, OR. (as cited in Welch and Burke 2001).
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 2000a. Inventory of Water Diversions in the Klamath
Project Service Area that Potentially Entrain Endangered Lost River and Shortnose Suck-
ers, Draft. U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath 13asin Area Office,
OR. January 19, 2000.
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 2000b. Klamath Project Historical Operation. U.S.13u-
reau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath 13asin Area Office, Klamath Falls,
OR.
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 2001a.13iological Assessment of Klamath Project's Con-
tinuing Operations on the Endangered Lost River Sucker and Shortnose Sucker. U.S.
Department of the Interior, U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath
13asin Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR. February 13, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://
www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao/esa/34_final_sucker_bo_4_06_01.pdf [accessed August 18,
2001].
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 2001b.13iological Assessment of the Klamath Project's
Continuing Operations on Southern Oregon/Northern California ESU Coho Salmon and
Critical Habitat for Southern Oregon/Northern California ESU Coho Salmon. U.S. De-
partment of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath 13asin
Area Office, OR. 53 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.usbr.gov/kbao [accessed
August 18, 2001]
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 2002a. Final Biological Assessment: The Effects of Pro-
posed Actions Related to Klamath Project Operation (April 1, 2002 - March 31, 2012)
on Federally-Listed Threatened and Endangered Species. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,
Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath 13asin Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR.
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 2002b. Summary of Water Quality and Fisheries Sam-
pling Conducted in Gerber Reservoir, OR. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region. Klamath 13asin Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR. Octo-
ber, 2002. 70 pp.
US13R (U.S.13ureau of Reclamation). 2003. Klamath River Water Quality 2000 Monitoring
Program: Project Report. U.S.13ureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls Area Office, with
support from PacifiCorp., Watercourse Engineering, Inc., Napa, CA. January 25, 2003.
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 1999. Census of Agriculture: 1997. U.S. Summary
and State Data, Vol.1. Geographic Area Series Part 51, Introduction. AC97-A-51. Na-
tional Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. [Online]. Avail-
OCR for page 375
REFERENCES
375
able: http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census97/volumel/us linto.pdf [accessed Feb.12,
2003].
USES (U.S. Forest Service). 2002. Scott River Watershed Adult Coho Spawning Survey, De-
cember 2001 - January 2002. Klamath Forest Service, Fort Jones, CA. 27 pp.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1991. Young Salmon are Sensitive to Arsenite and
Mercury Released by Placer Mining Activities. Research Information Bulletin No. 30.
Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, MO.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1992a.13iological Opinion on Effects of Long-term
Operation of the Klamath Project. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Falls, OR.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1992b. Cui-ui (Chasmistes cujus) Recovery Plan,
Second Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, Portland, OR. 47 pp.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1994. Federal Interagency Memorandum of Under-
standing for Implementation of the Endangered Species Act. September 28, 1994.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1999. Environmental Impact Statement/Report.
Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration, Draft Environmental Impact Report. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata, CA. [Online]. Available: http://www.ccfwo.rl.fws.gov/
fisheries/treis.html [accessed Oct. 6, 2003].
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2000. Record of Decision, Trinity River Mainstem
Fishery Restoration, Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Re-
port, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. [Online]. Available: http://
www.ccfwo.rl .fws.gov/fisheries/reports/treis/ROD 12-19-00(b ).pdf [accessed August 22,
2003].
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2001.13iological/Conference Opinion Regarding the
Effects of Operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the Endangered
Lost River Sucker (Deltistes luxatus), Endangered Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes
brevirostris), Threatened Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and Proposed Critical
Habitat for the Lost River/Shortnose Suckers. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath
Falls Fish and Wildlife Office, Klamath Falls, OR.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2002.13iological/Conference Opinion Regarding the
Effects of Operation of the U.S.13ureau of Reclamation's Proposed 10-Year Operation
Plan for the Klamath Project and its Effect on the Endangered Lost River Sucker (Deltistes
luxatus), Endangered Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), Threatened Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and Proposed Critical Habitat for the Lost River and
Shortnose Suckers. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Of-
fice, Klamath Falls, OR.
USFWS/HVT (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Hoopa Valley Tribe). 1999. Trinity River
Flow Evaluation. Final Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife
Office, and Hoopa Valley Tribe, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 1995. Klamath River Basin Characterization of Hydrology
Data from U.S.G.S. Records. In Compilation of Phase I Reports for the Klamath River
Basin, May 1995. River Systems Management Section, National Biological Service, Mid-
Continent Ecological Science Center, Fort Collins, CO.
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 1998. Status of Listed Species and Recovery Plan Develop-
ment June Sucker Chasmistes liorus-Endangered, Utah. Northern Prairie Wildlife Re-
search Center, U.S. Geological Survey. [Online]. Available: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/
resource/distr/others/recoprog/states/species/chaslior.htm [accessed June 23, 2003].
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2002. Monitoring of Lost River and Shortnose Suckers in the
Upper Klamath Basin, 2001. Prepared by U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries
Research Center, Klamath Falls Field, Klamath Falls, OR, for the U. S.13ureau of Recla-
mation, Mid-Pacific Region, Klamath Area Office, Klamath Falls, OR. Contract
#OOAA200049.
OCR for page 376
376
REFERENCES
Viola, A.E., and M.L. Schuck. 1995. A method to reduce the abundance of residual hatchery
steelhead in rivers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 15(2):488-493.
Voight, H.N., and D.13. Gale. 1998. Distribution of Fish Species in Tributaries of the Lower
Klamath River: An Interim Report for 1996. Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program. Technical
Report 3. Habitat Assessment and Biological Monitoring Division, Klamath, CA. 71 pp.
Wales, J.H. 1951. The Decline of the Shasta River King Salmon Run. Inland Fisheries Admin-
istrative Report 51-18. California Department of Fish and Game. 82 pp.
Walker, W.W. 2001. Development of a Phosphorus TMDL for Upper Klamath Lake, Or-
egon. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. March 7, 2001.
Wallace, M. 2000. Length of Residency of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Klamath River
Estuary. Final Performance Report. Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act. Project F-
51-R; Subproject 32. California Department of Fish and Game, Arcata, CA. [Online].
Available: http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#General Methods [ac-
cessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Wallace, M., and 13.W. Collins. 1997. Variation in use of the Klamath River estuary by
juvenile chinook salmon. Calif. Fish Game Bull. 83(4):132-143.
Walters, C.J. 1997. Adaptive policy design: Thinking at larger spatial scales. Pp. 386-394 in
Wildlife and Landscape Ecology: Effects of Pattern and Scale, J.A.13issonette, ed. New
York: Springer.
Walters, C.J., and R. Hilborn. 1978. Ecological optimization and adaptive management. Ann.
Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8:157-188.
Walters, C.J., and C.S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by
doing. Ecology 71(6):2060-2068.
Warner, R.R. 1988. Traditionality of mating site preferences in a coral reef fish. Nature
(Land.) 335:719-721.
Warner, R.R. 1990. Resource assessment versus traditionality in mating site determination.
Am. Nat. 135(2):205-217.
Warren, Jr., M.L., and AM. Burr. 1994. Status of freshwater fishes of the United States:
Overview of an imperiled fauna. Fisheries 19(1):6-18.
Waterman, T.T. 1920. Yurok Geography.13erkeley: University of California Press. (Reprinted
by Trinidad Museum Society, Trinidad, CA, 1993).
Waters, E.C., HA. Weber, and D.W. Holland. 1999. The role of agriculture in Oregon's
economic base: Findings from a social accounting matrix. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 24(1):
266-280.
Weber,13., and 13. Sorte. 2002. The Upper Klamath basin economy and the role of agriculture.
Pp. 213-229 in Water Allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: An Assess-
ment of Natural Resource, Economic, Social, and Institutional Issues in the Upper Kla-
math Basin, W.S. 13raunworth, Jr., T. Welch, and R. Hathaway, eds. Corvallis, OR:
Oregon State University Extension Service. [Online]. Available: http://eesc.orst.edu/
nagcomwebfile/edmat/html/sr/srl 037/srl 037.html [accessed March 10, 2003].
Weddell, 13.J. 2000. Relationship Between Flows in the Klamath River and Lower Klamath
Lake Prior to 1910. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service, Klamath Basin Refuges. Tule Lake, CA. November 28, 2000.
Weidner, C.,13. Nixdorf, R. Heinz,13. Wirsing, U. Neumann, and J. Weckesser. 2002. Regula-
tion of cyanobacteria and microcystin dynamics in polymictic shallow lakes. Arch.
Hydrobiol. 155(3):383-400.
Weitkamp, L.A., T.C. Wainwright, G.J.13ryant, G.13. Milner, D.J. Teel, R.G. Kope, and R.S.
Waples. 1995. Status Review of Coho Salmon from Washington, Oregon, and Califor-
nia. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-24. Seattle, WA: U.S. Dept. of
Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fish-
OCR for page 377
REFERENCES
377
cries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center. 258pp. [Online]. Available: http://
www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications/techmemos/tm24/tm24.htm [accessed Oct. 9, 2003].
Welch, E.13., and T. Burke. 2001. Interim Summary Report: Relationship Between Lake El-
evation and Water Quality in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Prepared by R2 Resource
Consultants, Inc., Redmond, WA, for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Portland, OR. March
23, 2001.
Wells, H.L. 1881. History of Siskiyou County, California. Oakland, CA: D.J. Stewart and
Co. 240 pp. (reprinted in 1971 by Siskiyou Historical Society).
Wells, R.E., and R.W. Simpson. 2001. Northward migration of the Cascadia forearc in the
northwestern U.S. and implications for subduction deformation. Earth, Planets Space
53(4):275-283.
Wells, R.E., C.S. Weaver, S. Craig, and R.J. 13lakely. 1998. Fore-arc migration in Cascadia
and its neotectonic significance. Geology 26(8):759-762.
Welsh, Jr., H.H., G.R. Hodgson,13.C. Harvey, and M.F. Roche. 2001. Distribution of juve-
nile coho salmon in relation to water temperatures in tributaries of the Mattole River,
California. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21(3):464-470.
West, J.R. 1991. A Proposed Strategy to Recover Endemic Spring-Run Chinook Salmon
Populations and Their Habitats in the Klamath River Basin. File Report. U.S. Depart-
ment of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. 25 pp. [Online]. Available:
http://www.krisweb.com/krisweb_kt/biblio/biblio.htm#Salmon River Sub-basin [accessed
Oct. 9, 2003].
West, J.R., O.J. Dix, A.D. Olson, M.V. Anderson, S.A. Fox, and J.H. Power. 1990. Evalua-
tion of Fish Habitat Conditions and Utilization in Salmon, Scott, Shasta and Mid-Kla-
math Sub-13asin Tributaries 1988-1989. Annual Report for Interagency Agreement 14-
16-0001-89508. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Klamath National Forest,
Yreka, CA. 90 pp.
Wetzel, R.G. 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems, 3rd Ed. San Diego, CA: Aca-
demic Press.
Wetzel, R.G., and G.E. Likens. 2000. Limnological Analyses, 3rd Ed. New York: Springer.
White, R. 1991. It's Your Misfortune and None of My Own: A History of the American
West. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Wilhere, G.F. 2002. Adaptive management in habitat conservation plans. Conserv. Viol.
16(1):20-29.
Williams, G., ed. 1971. Peter Skene Ogden's Snake Country Journals 1827-28 and 1828-29.
Publications of the Hudson's Bay Record Society No. 28. London: Hudson's Bay Record
~ .
Society.
Williamson, C.E., R.S. Stemberger, D.P. Morris, T.M. Frost, and S. G. Paulson. 1996. Ultra-
violet radiation in North American lakes: Attenuation estimates from DOC measure-
ments and implications for plankton communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41(5):1024-1034.
Wood, T.M. 2001. Sediment Oxygen Demand in Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon,
1999. Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4080. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. of the
Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
Wood, T.M., G.J. Fuhrer, and J.L. Morace. 1996. Relation between Selected Water-Quality
Variables and Lake Level in Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon. Water-
Resources Investigations Report 96-4079. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S.
Geological Survey.
Wu, J., R.M. Adams, and W.G.13oggess. 2000. Cumulative effects and optimal targeting of
conservation efforts: Steelhead trout habitat enhancement in Oregon. Am. J. Agric. Econ.
82(2):400-413.
OCR for page 378
Representative terms from entire chapter:
klamath lake
