Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 65
References Association of American Universities Committee on Graduate Education. 1998. Report and Recommendations. Washington, D.C. Bowen, W. G., and N. L. Rudenstine. 1992. In Pursuit of the PhD. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Cartter, A. M. 1966. An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education. Cole, J., and S. Cole. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). 1995. Reshaping the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers, Execu- tive Summary. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. Duderstadt, J. J. 2000. A University for the 21St Century. Ann Arbor, Mich.: The University of Michigan Press. Ehrenberg, R. G., and P. J. Hurst. 1998. The 1995 Ratings of Doctoral Programs: A Hedonic Model. The Economics of Education Review. 17(2): 137- 148. Ehrenberg, R. G., and P. J. Hurst. 1996. The 1995 Ratings of Doctoral Programs: A Hedonic Model. Change. May/June:46-50. Gaff, J. G., A. S. Pruitt-Logan, and R. Weibl. 2000. Building the Faculty We Need. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Goldberger, M. L., B. A. Maher, and P. E. Flattau. 1995. Research- Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Golde, C. M. July 2001 draft. Overview of Doctoral Education Initiatives, Studies and Reports: 1990-Present. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Report. Golde, C. M., and T. M. Dore. 2001. At Cross Purposes: What the expe- riences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Report prepared for The Pew Charitable Trusts. Philadlephia, Pa. Graham, H. D., and N. Diamond. 1997. The Rise of American Research Universities. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press. Graham, H. D., and N. Diamond. 1999. Academic Departments and the Ratings Game. Chronicle of Higher Education June 18:B6. Jones, L. V., G. Lindzey, and P. E. Coggeshall. 1982. An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Junn, J., and R. Brooks. 2000. A Brief Analysis of the 1992-93 Reputational Data in the 1995 NRC Report. Report submitted to the NRC, Septem- ber 14. LaPidus, J. 2000. Great Expectations: The Role of the American Univer- sity in the 21St Century in J. Hamblin, ea., A Walk Through Graduate Education: Selected Papers and Speeches of Jules B. LaPidus. Wash- ington, D.C.: Council of Graduate Schools. 65 Lorden, J., and L. Martin. n.d. Toward a Better Way to Rate Research Doctoral Programs. A position paper prepared for the NASULGC's Council on Research Policy and Graduate Education. See http:// www. nasulgc. org/publications/towards_a_better_way. pdf. Maher, B. A. 1996. How to Read the 1995 National Research Council Report Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: A Guide for Students and Others. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. The National Association of Graduate and Professional Students. 2000. 2000 NAGPS Survey. http://www.nagps.org. National Science Foundation. 2001. Employment Preferences and Out- comes of Recent Science and Engineering Doctorate Holders in the Labor Market. NSF-02-304. October 30. Arlington, Va. National Science Foundation. 2002. Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 2001. NSF-03-300. Ch. 3:2-3. Arlington, Va. Nerad, M., and J. Cerny. 1999. Postdoctoral Patterns, Career Advance- ment, and Problems. Science 285(3 September):1533-35. Nerad, M., and J. Cerny. 1999. From Rumors to Facts: Career Outcomes of English Ph.D.s: Results from the Ph.D.s Ten Years later Study. Council of Graduate Schools Communicator 32(7, Special Fall Issue): 1-11. Reprinted in Association of Departments of English Bulletin, winter 2000:124. Nerad, M., and J. Cerny. 2002. Postdoctoral Appointments and Employ- ment Patterns of Science and Engineering Doctoral Recipients Ten-plus Years after Ph.D. Completion: Selected Results from the Ph.D.s - Ten Years Later Study. Council of Graduate Schools Communicator September issue. Maresi Nerad, Rebecca Aanerud, and Joseph Cerny, "So You Want to Be a Professor!: Lessons from the 'PhDs-Ten Years Later' Study" Ph.D.s- Ten Years Later: Implication for the Preparation of Future Faculty," in Donald Wulff and Ann Austin. Enriching Graduate Education to Prepare the Next Generation of Faculty: Challenges, Research and Practice, Jossey Bass (forth coming ) Nyquist, J. D., and B. J. Woodford. 2000. Re-envisioning the Ph.D.: What Concerns Do We Have? Booklet produced for Re-envisioning the Ph.D. Conference, April 13-15, 2000. Seattle, Wash.: Center for Instruc- tional Development and Research and the University of Washington. Nyquist, J. D., L. Manning, D. H. Wulff, A. E. Austin, J. Sprague, P. Fraser, C. Calcagno, and B. Woodford. 1999. On the Road to Becoming a professor: The Graduate Student Experience. Change 31(3):18-27. Peterson. 1999. Peterson's Graduate and Professional Programs: An Over- view, 33r~ edition. Princeton, N.J. Roose, K. D., and C. J. Andersen. 1970. A Rating of Graduate Programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
OCR for page 65
66 Webster, D.S., and T. Skinner. 1996. Rating Ph.D. Programs: What the NRC Report Says ... and Doesn't Say. Change May/June: 23-44. Zuckerman, H., and J. S. Meisel. 2000. The Foundation's Programs for Research Universities and Humanistic Scholarship in the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation 2000 Annual Report (www.mellon.org/Annuat). ASSESSING RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS