National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$49.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Treatments for Addiction: Behavioral, Ethical, Legal, and Social Questions (2004)
Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences (BBCSS)
Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (HPDP)
Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health (NBH)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix E: The Use of Immunotherapies and Sustained-Release Formulations in the Treatment of Drug Addiction: Will Current Law Support Coercion?." New Treatments for Addiction: Behavioral, Ethical, Legal, and Social Questions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
187
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Treatments for Addiction: Behavioral, Ethical, Legal, and Social Questions

Petersilia, J. (1998). Probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (p. 563). New York: Oxford University Press.

Petersilia, J. (1999). Parole and prisoner re-entry in the United States. In M. Tonry and J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons: Crime and justice (p. 502). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Rain, S.D., Williams, V.F., Robbins, P.C., Manahan, J., and Steadman, H.J. (2003). Perceived coercion at hospital admission and adherence to mental health treatment after discharge. Psychiatric Services, 54(1), 103-105.

Ridgely, M.S., Borum, R., and Petrila, J. (2001). Effectiveness of involuntary outpatient treatment: Empirical evidence and the experience of eight states. (MR-1340-CSCR). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Riley, K.J., Ebener, P.A., Chiesa, J.R., Turner, S., and Ringel, J.S. (2000). Drug offenders and the criminal justice system: Will Proposition 36 treat or create problems? (IP-204). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.


Siegel, D.M., Grudzinskas, A.J., Jr., and Pinals, D.A. (2001). Old law meets new medicine: Revisiting existing involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant. Wisconsin Law Review, 307, 313.


Winick, J. (1997). Symposium on coercion: An interdisciplinary examination of coercion, exploitation, and the law: III. Coerced confinement and treatment. Denver Univiversity Law Review, 74, 1145.

Page
187