. "Appendix I: Vaccines and Immunotherapies to Control Addiction in Minors: The Legal Framework." New Treatments for Addiction: Behavioral, Ethical, Legal, and Social Questions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
New Treatments for Addiction: Behavioral, Ethical, Legal, and Social Questions
Glantz, L.H. (1998). Research with children. American Journal of Law and Medicine,24(2-3), 213-244.
Gregory, A. (1997). Denying protection to those most in need: The FDA’s unconstitutional treatment of children. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology,121, 134-147.
Grodin, M., and Glantz, L. (Eds.). (1994). Historical overview: Pediatric experimentation. In Children as research subjects: Science, ethics, and law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hart, J. (1999). Cancer patient beating odds. Boston Globe, March 7, p. 82.
Hartman, R.G. (2000). Adolescent autonomy: Clarifying an ageless conundrum. Hastings Law Journal, 51, 1265.
Hartman, R.G. (2002). Coming of age: Devising legislation for adolescent medical decision-making. American Journal of Law and Medicine,28(4), 409-453.
Hawkins, S.D. (1996). The rights and interests of competent minors in litigated medical treatment disputes. Fordham Law Review,64, 2075.
Hoffman, D.E., and Rothenberg, K.H. (2002). Whose duty is it anyway? The Kennedy Krieger opinion and its implications for public health research. Journal of Health Care Law and Policy,6, 109-147.
Holder, A.R. (1985). Legal issues in pediatrics and adolescent medicine. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hora, P.F., Schma, W.G., and Rosenthal, J.T.A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review,74, 439-538.
Jones, C.J. (1990). Autonomy and informed consent in medical decisionmaking: Toward a new self-fulfilling prophecy. Washington and Lee Law Review,47, 379-430.
Katz, J. (1984). The silent world of doctor and patient. New York: Free Press.
Kerper, H.B., and Kerper, J. (1974). Legal rights of the convicted. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Kimelman, D. (1990). Norplant: Can contraception reduce the underclass? Philadelphia. Inquirer, December 12, p. A18.
Komoroski, A.L. (2001). Stimulant drug therapy for hyperactive children: Adjudicating disputes between parents and educators. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 11, 97-122.
Kress, K. (2000). An argument for assisted outpatient treatment for persons with serious mental illness illustrated with reference to a proposed statute for Iowa. Iowa Law Review, 85, 1269.
Kurtz, H. (1990). Inquirer birth control bomb: Staff uproar over editorial. Washington Post, December 18, p. B10.
Kuszler, P.C. (1996). Balancing the barriers: Exploiting and creating incentive to promote development of new tuberculosis treatments. Washington Law Review,71(4), 919-967.
Labson, M.S. (2002). Pediatric priorities: Legislative and regulatory initiatives to expand research on the use of medicines in pediatric patients. Journal of Health Care Law and Policy,6, 34.
Lane, H., and Grodin, M. (1997). Ethical issues in cochlear implant surgery: An exploration into disease, disability, and best interests of the child. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal,7(3), 231-251.
Lasalandra, M. (2001). Government agrees to review treatment. Boston Globe, November 13, p. 1.
Levin, T. (1991). Implanted birth control device renews debate over forced contraception. New York Times, January 10, p. A20.
Macklin, R. (1982). Some problems in gaining informed consent from psychiatric patients. Emory Law Journal,31, 345-374.