| Copyright © 2010. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 1
Executive Summary
In response to a request from the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for
Science and Technology and from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Committee on
Advanced Energetic Materials and Manufacturing Technologies conducted a study of the
scope and health of U.S. research and development efforts in energetic materials. The study
focused on six major technical areas:
New energetic materials synthesis and development
Thermobaric explosives
Reactive materials
Nanomixtures and nanocomposites
Advanced gun propellants, and
Exotic physics.
Based on information gathered from meetings, site visits, and presentations from the
Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and
academic and industrial organizations, the committee's major findings are as follows:
.
.
Although all modern defense systems and weaponry rely on energetic materials as
an explosive fill or a propellant from guns, rifles, missiles, and rockets, the U.S. effort
in research and development of energetic materials is small, fragmented, and
suboptimal, leaving this critical national technology area at risk.
The suboptimal U.S. effort is characterized by severe resource limitations across the
entire spectrum of energetic materials research and development, but particularly in
the funding for scale-up and advanced development studies of potential new
materials and in the training of replacements for the aging workforce.
· The current focus in the Department of Defense is on limited theater actions, with
an emphasis on deployment of precision strike smart weapons that are smaller,
cheaper, and at the same time more lethal against all target classes—demands that
1
OCR for page 2
2
ADVANCED ENERGETIC MA TERIALS
advanced energetic materials can address.
.
Current funding sources for the military services for advanced energetic materia
research are most often narrowly focused on near-term individual service
requirements associated with hyperbole in news accounts of foreign weapons
effects, as well as overly dramatized intelligence reports of foreign capabilities.)
Such short-term efforts can reflect perceived technology capability gaps. The
resulting competition for scarce resources inhibits cooperative research and
development efforts across the government aimed at more global national
requirements.
In addition to the specific technical recommendations presented at the end of each
chapter in the report, the committee offers the following two major recommendations:
1. The committee recommends that the Department of Defense redirect attention and
resources to focus on strategies for reducing transition barriers to scale-up.
IS
This effort should be closely coupled to the ongoing efforts of the services to improve
target lethality and weapons effects. Such an approach would ensure an extensive
technology effort from the energetic materials community and would help provide for an
adequate supply of well-trained scientists and engineers to meet the nation's future defense
requirements.
2. The committee recommends that the Department of Defense consider centralizing its
management of energetic materials research and development in order to achieve a longer-
term, cross-service perspective.
One possible approach to such a restructuring might include establishing an Energetic
Materials Technology Office in the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). Similar to the
Office of Munitions, such an office would require a unique program element funding line as
well as the charter and authority to lead a national, coordinated energetic materials
technology thrust effectively. A clear benefit of this approach would be a robust and
productive national effort in energetic materials technology.
The recently initiated Advanced Energetics Initiative could perhaps be the cornerstone
of this national effort.2 However, any approach to implementing this suggested office would
require establishing broad oversight and coordination responsibility as well as authority over
all the energetic materials programs of the Department of Defense and a charter to develop
Backgrounder on Russian Fuel Air Explosives ("Vacuum Bombs"~. Human Rights Watch, February
2000. Avai la ble at http://www. hrw.org/press/2000/02/chechO215b.htm.
George Smith.2002. Weapon of the Week: The Thermobaric Bomb. The Village Voice, December
18-24. Available at December 18-24, 2002. Accessed November 2003.
Noah Shachtman.2003. When a Gun Is More Than a Gun. Wired News, March 20. Available at
http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,58094,00.htm 1. Accessed Novem her 2003.
The Advanced Energetics Initiative was proposed by the Office of the Secretary of Defense for
maturing the fundamental technologies required to transition the next generation of energetics
materials into field use.
OCR for page 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
cooperative engagement with and coordination of industrial and academic programs of the
National Laboratories focused on energetic materials.
The overarching issue remains one of priority. Energetic materials are a key
component of the nation's defense strategies. A coordinated and sustained effort in
research, technology transition, and production technologies is needed to maintain the
contribution of these materials to U.S. national defense.
3
OCR for page 4
Representative terms from entire chapter:
advanced energetic