National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 The Way Forward
Suggested Citation:"7 Conclusion." National Research Council. 2004. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10957.
×

7
Conclusion

The importance of enhancing the understanding of the relationship between airborne particulate matter (PM) and health has led the nation to embark on a multiyear, multidisciplinary research program designed to inform decisions on the PM NAAQS and to evaluate the effectiveness of source control strategies. During its tenure, the committee has had the opportunity to propose a research agenda, monitor its implementation, and gauge initial progress in reducing key scientific uncertainties. This 5-year experience has provided an opportunity to make observations concerning the process of initiating and subsequently managing a large multidisciplinary research program. Through this process, the committee identified some strengths and weaknesses of research and management approaches. The committee has also seen some of the initially recommended studies reach publication and then enter into EPA’s process of NAAQS review.

Overall progress to date on several of the committee’s priority research topics is encouraging and demonstrates that some of the key uncertainties can be addressed quickly by using targeted research initiatives, as in the example of research on outdoor concentrations versus actual human exposure (topic 1). It is not surprising that much research remains to be done from the committee’s original research agenda, as detailed in Chapters 3 and 4. That conclusion is especially true for the related topics of characterization of emission sources (topic 3) and air quality model development and testing (topic 4), which are critical to informing future decisions, as well as assessment of hazardous PM components (topic 5).

Beyond continuing to seek the answers to these specific questions, the committee has identified seven important scientific challenges that need to be addressed as implementation of the committee’s research portfolio proceeds:

Suggested Citation:"7 Conclusion." National Research Council. 2004. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10957.
×
  • Completing the PM emissions inventory and developing and testing air quality models for the implementation of current and possible future PM NAAQS.

  • Developing a systematic program to assess the comparative toxicity of different components of the PM mixture and of the mixture itself.

  • Planning and implementing new studies on the effects of long-term exposure.

  • Improving the relevance of toxicological approaches.

  • Enhancing the ability of the air quality monitoring system to track progress and serve as an element for estimating exposure for future health research.

  • Moving beyond PM to a multipollutant approach to improve air quality overall in a health-relevant manner.

  • Integrating disciplines.

Some progress has been made in addressing these challenges (for example, the implementation of the nationwide speciation monitoring network), but these seven issues need careful attention as the PM research program continues. By addressing these issues directly, it is the committee’s judgment that the pace of scientific gain should be quickened, and the quality of research evidence strengthened.

These issues also pose important challenges to the management of science. To be able to address them effectively, Chapter 6 has identified a series of steps that must be taken to effectively manage this complex scientific enterprise, which can be grouped into three broad categories:

  1. An even higher level of sustained integration and interaction both among the scientific disciplines and among the full range of public and private research funding organizations will be needed to complete the research portfolio.

  2. Much stronger tools will be needed to compile and synthesize the large amounts of new information being developed in this research program.

  3. Perhaps most important, sustained and substantially enhanced management of this program by EPA, accompanied by a continuing mechanism for independent review and oversight of the program, will be the only way to ensure that the investment in the research is being made. EPA has taken steps toward better management, but recent transitions in the management of that effort and a substantial need for new management systems and

Suggested Citation:"7 Conclusion." National Research Council. 2004. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10957.
×

administrative mechanisms for supporting research, especially on the topic of assessment of hazardous PM components, suggest that EPA will need to enhance its efforts. Equally important will be the development of some form of a successor to this committee to provide continued monitoring and guidance to the efforts of EPA and others.

Much has been learned since 1998 research investment, and the evidence gained by the investment is already being used in the decisions that will continue to be made even with the uncertainties. Much is still to be learned. A failure to invest in advancing the understanding of the effects of PM and air pollution on health risks would result, in general, in not taking full advantage of the substantial research investment to date and limiting the nation’s ability to make evidence-based health policy and air quality regulatory choices in the future. Alternatively, continued enhancement of the air pollution and health research effort will undoubtedly yield substantial benefits for years to come. It is clearly the latter choice that offers the most promise to the nation in its effort to improve air quality and public health.

Suggested Citation:"7 Conclusion." National Research Council. 2004. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10957.
×
Page 166
Suggested Citation:"7 Conclusion." National Research Council. 2004. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10957.
×
Page 167
Suggested Citation:"7 Conclusion." National Research Council. 2004. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10957.
×
Page 168
Next: References »
Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $57.00 Buy Ebook | $45.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established regulatory standards to address health risks posed by inhaling tiny particles from smoke, vehicle exhaust, and other sources. At the same time, Congress and the EPA began a multimillion dollar research effort to better understand the sources of these airborne particles, the levels of exposure to people, and the ways that these particles cause disease.

To provide independent guidance to the EPA, Congress asked the National Research Council to study the relevant issues. The result was a series of four reports on the particulate-matter research program. The first two books offered a conceptual framework for a national research program, identified the 10 most critical research needs, and described the recommended timing and estimated costs of such research. The third volume began the task of assessing initial progress made in implementing the research program. This, the fourth and final volume, gauged research progress made over a 5-year period on each of the 10 research topics. The National Research Council concludes that particulate matter research has led to a better understanding of the health effects caused by tiny airborne particles. However, the EPA, in concert with other agencies, should continue research to reduce further uncertainties and inform long-term decisions.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!