Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$35.75
Web:$32.18
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

Existing and Potential Standoff Explosives Detection Techniques (2004)
Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology (BCST)

Page
96
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Existing and Potential Standoff Explosives Detection Techniques

Combining Imaging and Material Composition

Imaging alone does not give a complete identification of explosives. It is clearly a major advantage to combine an image with a measurement of the specific explosive composition. Many composition detection techniques only identify an anomalous nitrogen content, and do not provide conclusive evidence of the presence of an explosive device. A combined image, showing wires or a dielectric shape in the form of an explosive device and an anomalously large nitrogen concentration, would enhance the decision-making task. An example of a portal scenario with combined imaging and nitrogen concentration is a backscatter X-ray image of a truck along with a neutron scattering signal showing anomalously high nitrogen concentrations. Another example is a suicide bomber imaged by a terahertz scan paired with an indication of explosive molecules by a LIDAR signal from the plume of vapors arising from the bomber.

Recommendation: Research is needed on new spectroscopic and imaging methods employable at a distance (passive and active). Examples include terahertz and microwave imaging and spectroscopy and X-ray backscattering.

Page
96