National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

Menu menu

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$49.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness: Judging the Quality of K-12 Mathematics Evaluations (2004)
Mathematical Sciences Education Board (MSEB)
 Center for Education (CFE)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix B: Bibliography of Studies Included in Committee Analysis." On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness: Judging the Quality of K-12 Mathematics Evaluations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan
Page
224
bottomleft bottomright
  E-mail
Share on facebook Facebook
Share on delicious Delicious
Share on stumbleupon Stumble
Share on twitter Twitter
More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness: Judging the Quality of K-12 Mathematics Evaluations

  1. Braams, B. (2003). Spiraling through UCSMP everyday mathematics. Available: http://www.math.nyu.edu/mfdd/braams/links/emspiral.html [8/27/03].

  2. Burrill, G., and Romberg, T. A. (1998). Statistics and probability for the middle grades: Examples from mathematics in context. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections of statistics: Agendas for learning, teaching, and assessment in K-12. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  3. Bush, W. (1996). Kentucky middle grades mathematics teacher network: An evaluation of four middle grades mathematics curriculum projects funded by the National Science Foundation (ESI-9253194). Unpublished manuscript.

  4. Clopton, P., McKeown, E., McKeown, M. and Clopton, J. (1998). Mathematically correct algebra 1 reviews. Available: http://mathematicallycorrect.com/algebra.htm (7/14/03).

  5. Clopton, P., McKeown, E., McKeown, M. and Clopton, J. (1999). Mathematically correct fifth grade mathematics review. Available: http://mathematicallycorrect.com/books5.htm (7/14/03).

  6. Clopton, P., McKeown, E., McKeown, M. and Clopton, J. (1999). Mathematically correct second grade mathematics review. Available: http://mathematicallycorrect.com/books2.htm (7/14/03).

  7. Clopton, P., McKeown, E., McKeown, M. and Clopton, J. (1999). Mathematically correct seventh grade mathematics review. Available: http://mathematicallycorrect.com/books7.htm (7/14/03). Unpublished document.

  8. Denny, R. (1993). STEM evaluation. Unpublished document.

  9. Klein, D. (2000). Weaknesses of everyday mathematics K-3. Available: http://www.math.nyu.edu/mfdd/braams/nychold/report-klein-em-00.html [8/27/03]. Unpublished manuscript.

  10. Klein, D., and Marple, J. (2000). A comparison of three K-6 mathematics programs: Sadlier, Saxon, and SRA McGraw-Hill. Available: http://mathematicallycorrect.com/k6books.pdf [7/14/03].

  11. McConnell, J. (1991). C & D 163 writing assignment program evaluation: UCSMP evaluation Glenbrook South high school. Unpublished manuscript.

  12. McQuire, M., and Simpson, N. (1991). UCSMP algebra adoption telephone survey, Florida report MR-103-2470. Unpublished manuscript.

  13. McQuire, M., and Simpson, N. (1991). UCSMP algebra user survey report MR-101-2469. Unpublished document.

  14. Milgram, R. J. (undated). An evaluation on CMP. Available: ftp://math.stanford.edu/pub/papers/milgram/report-on-cmp.html [8/27/ 03].

 Page
224