National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Annex D Additional Research Areas of Committee Interest
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"Annex E Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11097.
×
Page 57

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Annex E Bibliography Acs, Z. and D. Audretsch. 1991. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Alic, John A., Lewis Branscomb, Harvey Brooks, Ashton B. Carter, and Gerald L. Epstein. 1992. Beyond Spinoff: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. "Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention." Pp. 609–625 in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Arrow, Kenneth. 1973. "The theory of discrimination." Pp. 3−31 in Discrimination In Labor Markets, Orley Ashenfelter and Albert Rees, eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Audretsch, David B. 1995. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Audretsch, David B. and Maryann P. Feldman. 1996. "R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production." American Economic Review 86(3):630–640. Audretsch, David B. and Paula E. Stephan. 1996. "Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology." American Economic Review 86(3):641–642. Audretsch, D. and R. Thurik. 1999. Innovation, Industry Evolution, and Employment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Barfield, C. and W. Schambra, eds., 1986. The Politics of Industrial Policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Baron, Jonathan. 1998. “DoD SBIR/STTR Program Manager.” Comments at the Methodology Workshop on the Assessment of Current SBIR Program Initiatives, Washington, D.C., October. Barry, C. B.. 1994. “New directions in research on venture capital finance.” Financial Management 23 (Autumn):3–15. Bator, Francis. 1958. "The anatomy of market failure." Quarterly Journal of Economics 72:351–379. Bingham, R. 1998. Industrial Policy American Style: From Hamilton to HDTV. New York: M.E. Sharpe. Birch, D. 1981. “Who Creates Jobs.” The Public Interest 65 (Fall):3–14. Branscomb, Lewis M., Kenneth P. Morse, Michael J. Roberts, and Darin Boville. 2000. Managing Technical Risk: Understanding Private Sector Decision Making on Early Stage Technology Based Projects. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. Branscomb, Lewis M. and Philip E. Auerswald. 2001. Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Managers, and Investors Manage Risk in High-Tech Innovations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Branscomb, Lewis M. and J. Keller, 1998. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 49

Brav, A. and P. A. Gompers, 1997. “Myth or reality?: Long-run underperformance of initial public offerings; Evidence from venture capital and nonventure capital-backed IPOs.” Journal of Finance 52:1791-1821. Brown, G. and J. Turner, 1999. “Reworking the Federal Role in Small Business Research.” Issues in Science and Technology (Summer): 51-58. Bush, Vannevar. 1946. Science—the Endless Frontier. Republished in 1960 by U.S. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. Caballero, Ricardo J. and Adam B. Jaffe (1993),"How high are the giants’ shoulders: an empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth," in O.J. Blanchard and S. Fischer (eds.) NBER Macroeconomic Annual 1993, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Caves, Richard E. 1998. "Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms." Journal of Economic Literature 36(4):1947–1982. Clinton, William Jefferson. 1994. Economic Report of the President. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Coburn, C. and D. Bergland, 1995. Partnerships: A Compendium of State and Federal Cooperative Technology Programs. Columbus, OH: Battelle. Cohen, L. R. and R. G. Noll, 1991. The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Cooper, R. S. Purpose and performance of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, Small Business Economics 20, pp. 137-151. Council of Economic Advisers, 1995. Supporting Research and Development to Promote Economic Growth: The Federal Government’s Role. Washington, D.C.. David, P., B. Hall, and A. Toole, “Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence,” Research Policy 29(4-5):497-530 (2000). Davis, S.J., J. Haltiwanger, and S. Schuh. 1994. “Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts,” Business Economics 29(3):113–22. Dertouzos, M. 1989. Made in America: The MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Eckstein, 1984. DRI Report on U.S. Manufacturing Industries, New York: McGraw Hill. Eisinger, P. K., 1988. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development Policy in the United State. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Feldman, Maryann P. 1994a. “Knowledge complementarity and innovation.” Small Business Economics 6(5):363–372. Feldman, Maryann P. 1994b. The Geography of Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Feldman, Maryann P. and Maryellen R. Kelley, 2003. “Leveraging Research and Development: Assessing the Impact of the U.S. Advanced Technology Program,” Small Business Economics Vol. 20, No. 2. Fenn, G. W., N. Liang, and S. Prowse, 1995. The Economics of the Private Equity Market. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Flamm, K., 1988. Creating the Computer. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. 50

Freear, J. and W. E. Wetzel, Jr. 1990. “Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs?” Journal of Business Venturing 5:77–89. Freeman, Chris and Luc Soete. 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Galbraith, J. K. 1957. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Gans, J. S. and S. Stern, 2003. When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit?: Evidence from the SBIR program. Economic Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 361-384 Garcia-Quevedo, J. 2004. “Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence.” Kyklos, Vol. 57. Geroski, Paul A. 1995. "What do we know about entry?" International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4):421–440. Gompers, P. A., 1995. “Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital.” Journal of Finance 50:1461–1489. Gompers, P. A. and J. Lerner. 1996. “The use of covenants: An empirical analysis of venture partnership agreements.” Journal of Law and Economics 39:463–498. Gompers, P. A. and J. Lerner. 1999. “An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership.” Journal of Financial Economics 51(1):3–7. Gompers, P. A. and J. Lerner. 1998a. “Capital formation and investment in venture markets: A report to the NBER and the Advanced Technology Program.” Unpublished working paper, Harvard University. Gompers, P. A. and J. Lerner. 1998b. “What drives venture capital fund-raising?” Unpublished working paper, Harvard University. Gompers, P. A. and J. Lerner. 1999. The Venture Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Good, M. L. 1995. Prepared testimony before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space (Photocopy, U.S. Department of Commerce). Graham, O. L. 1992. Losing Time: The Industrial Policy Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Greenwald, B. C., J. E. Stiglitz, and A. Weiss, 1984. “Information imperfections in the capital market and macroeconomic fluctuations.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 74:194–199. Griliches, Z. 1990. The Search for R&D Spillovers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hall, Bronwyn H. 1992. ”Investment and research and development: Does the source of financing matter?” Working Paper No. 92-194, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley. Hall, Bronwyn H. 1993. "Industrial research during the 1980s: Did the rate of return fall?" Brookings Papers: Microeconomics 2:289−343. Hamberg, Dan. 1963. "Invention in the industrial research laboratory.” Journal of Political Economy (April):95−115. Hao, K. Y. and A. B. Jaffe, 1993. “Effect of liquidity on firms’ R&D spending.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2:275–282. Hebert, Robert F. and Albert N. Link. 1989. "In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics 1(1):39–49. 51

Himmelberg, C. P. and B. C. Petersen, 1994. “R&D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high- tech industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 76:38–51. Hubbard, R. G. 1998. “Capital-market imperfections and investment.” Journal of Economic Literature 36:193–225. Huntsman, B. and J. P. Hoban, Jr. 1980. “Investment in new enterprise: Some empirical observations on risk, return, and market structure.” Financial Management 9 (Summer): 44–51. Jaffe, A. B. 1996, “Economic analysis of research spillovers—Implications for the Advanced Technology Program.” Washington, D.C.: Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce. Jaffe, A. B. 1998. "The importance of 'spillovers' in the policy mission of the Advanced Technology Program.” Journal of Technology Transfer (Summer). Jaffe, A. B. and M. Trajtenberg. 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Jewkes, J., D. Sawers, and R. Stillerman. 1958. The Sources of Invention. New York: St. Martin's Press. Kleinman, D. L.. 1995. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Kortum, Samuel, and Josh Lerner. 1998. "Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation?” NBER Working Papers 6846, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Krugman, P. 1990. Rethinking International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lach, S. “Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel, Journal of Industrial Economics December 2002, pp. 369-390 Langlois, Richard N. and Paul L. Robertson 1996. “Stop Crying over Spilt Knowledge: A Critical Look at the Theory of Spillovers and Technical Change.” Paper prepared for the MERIT Conference on Innovation, Evolution, and Technology. Maastricht, Netherlands, August 25-27. Lebow, I. 1995. Information Highways and Byways: From the Telegraph to the 21st Century. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Lerner, J. 1994. “The syndication of venture capital investments.” Financial Management 23 (Autumn):16– 27. Lerner, J. 1995. “Venture capital and the oversight of private firms.” Journal of Finance 50:301–318. Lerner, J. 1996. “The government as venture capitalist: The long-run effects of the SBIR program” (Working paper no. 5753, National Bureau of Economic Research). Lerner, J. 1998. “Angel financing and public policy: An overview” Journal of Banking and Finance 22(6– 8):773–784. Lerner, J. 1999. "The government as venture capitalist: The long-run effects of the SBIR program.” Journal of Business 72(3):285–297. Lerner, J. 1999. “Public venture capital: Rationales and evaluation,” in SBIR: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 52

Levy, D. M. and N. Terleckyk, 1983. “Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: A macroeconomic analysis” Bell Journal of Economics 14: 551–561. Liles, P. 1977. Sustaining the Venture Capital Firm. Cambridge, MA: Management Analysis Center. Link, Albert N. 1998. “Public/Private Partnerships as a Tool to Support Industrial R&D: Experiences in the United States.” Paper prepared for the working group on Innovation and Technology Policy of the OECD Committee for Science and Technology Policy, Paris. Link, Albert N. and John T. Scott. 1998a. Overcoming Market Failure: A Case Study of the ATP Focused Program on Technologies for the Integration of Manufacturing Applications (TIMA). Draft final report submitted to the Advanced Technology Program. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Technology. October. Link, Albert N. and John T. Scott. 1998b. "Assessing the infrastructural needs of a technology-based service sector: A new approach to technology policy planning." STI Review 22: 171–207. Link, Albert N. and John T. Scott. 1998c. Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic. Link, Albert N. and John Rees. 1990. "Firm size, university based research and the returns to R&D.” Small Business Economics 2(1):25–32. Malone, T. 1995. The Microprocessor: A Biography. Hamburg, Germany: Springer Verlag/Telos. Mansfield, E., J. Rapoport, A. Romeo, S. Wagner, and G. Beardsley, 1977. “Social and private rates of return from industrial innovations” Quarterly Journal of Economics 91: 221–240. Mansfield, E. 1985. “How Fast Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?” Journal of Industrial Economics. 34(2). Mansfield, E. 1996. Estimating Social and Private Returns from Innovations Based on the Advanced Technology Program: Problems and Opportunities. Unpublished report. Martin, Justin. 2002. “David Birch.” Fortune Small Business, December 1. McCraw, T. 1986. Mercantilism and the market: antecedents of American industrial policy, in Barfield, C., and Schambra, W., eds., The Politics of Industrial Policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Mervis, Jeffrey D. 1996. “A $1 Billion 'Tax' on R&D Funds." Science 272:942−944. Mowery, D. 1998. "Collaborative R&D: how effective is it,” Issues in Science and Technology, (Fal): 37-44. Mowery, D. and N. Rosenberg. 1989. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mowery, D. and N. Rosenberg. 1998. Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Myers, S., R. L. Stern, and M. L. Rorke. 1983. A Study of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. Lake Forest, Illinois: Mohawk Research Corporation. Myers, S. C. and N. Majluf. 1984. “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have,” Journal of Financial Economics 13:187–221. National Research Council. 1986. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 53

National Research Council. 1987. Semiconductor Industry and the National Laboratories: Part of a National Strategy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1991. Mathematical Sciences, Technology, and Economic Competitiveness. James, G. Glimm, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1995. Allocating Federal Funds for R&D. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1996. Conflict and Cooperation in National Competition for High-Technology Industry. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1997. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Third Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. Industry-Laboratory Partnerships: A Review of the Sandia Science and Technology Park Initiative. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. New Vistas in Transatlantic Science and Technology Cooperation. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2000. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: A Review of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2000. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. David C. Mowery, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Attracting Science and Mathematics PhDs to Secondary School Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Building a Workforce for the Information Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Capitalizing on New Needs and New Opportunities: Government-Industry Partnerships in Biotechnology and Information Technologies. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. A Review of the New Initiatives at the NASA Ames Research Center. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council, 2001. Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research 1978 to 2000, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 54

National Research Council. 2002. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies: Summary Report. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2002. Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Nelson, R. R. 1982. Government and Technological Progress. New York: Pergamon. Nelson, R. R. 1986. “Institutions supporting technical advances in industry.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 76(2): 188. Nelson, R. R., ed. 1993. National Innovation System: A Comparative Study. New York: Oxford University Press. Office of the President. 1990. U.S. Technology Policy. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President. Office of Management and Budget. 1996. Economic analysis of federal regulations under Executive Order 12866. Mimeo. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1982. Innovation in Small and Medium Firms. Paris: OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1997. Small Business Job Creation and Growth: Facts, Obstacles, and Best Practices. Paris: OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1998. Technology, Productivity and Job Creation: Toward Best Policy Practice. Paris: OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1995. Venture capital in OECD countries. Paris: OECD. Perret, G. 1989. A Country Made by War: From the Revolution to Vietnam—The Story of America's Rise to Power. New York: Random House. Powell, Walter W. and Peter Brantley. 1992. "Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks?" Pp. 366–394 in: N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Price Waterhouse. 1985. Survey of small high-tech businesses shows Federal SBIR awards spurring job growth, commercial sales. Washington, D.C.:Small Business High Technology Institute. Roberts, Edward B. 1968. "Entrepreneurship and technology.” Research Management (July):249−266. Romer, P. 1990. “Endogenous technological change.” Journal of Political Economy 98:71–102. Rosenbloom, R. and Spencer, W. 1996. Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era. Boston: Harvard Business Press. Rubenstein, A. H. 1958. Problems Financing New Research-Based Enterprises in New England. Boston Mass.: Federal Reserve Bank. Sahlman, W. A. 1990. “The structure and governance of venture capital organizations.” Journal of Financial Economics 27:473–521. Saxenian, Annalee. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Scherer, F. M. 1970. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. New York: Rand McNally College Publishing. 55

Scott, John T. 2003, Environmental Research and Development: US Industrial Research, the Clean Air Act and Environmental Damage, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Siegel, Donald S., David Waldman, and William Youngdahl. 1997. "The Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies: Human Resource Management Implications," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, August 1997, pp. 288-298. Small Business Administration. 1994. Small Business Innovation Development Act: Tenth-Year Results. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (and earlier years). Small Business Administration. 1992. Results of Three-Year Commercialization Study of the SBIR program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss. 1981. "Credit rationing in markets with incomplete information." American Economic Review 71:393−409. Schumpeter, J. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Scott, John T. 1998. "Financing and leveraging public/private partnerships: The hurdle-lowering auction." STI Review 23:67–84. Sohl, Jeffrey. 1999. Venture Capital, Vol. 1, No. 2. Sohl, Jeffery, John Freear, and W.E. Wetzel Jr. 2002. “Angles on Angels: Financing Technology-Based Ventures - An Historical Perspective.” Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Vol. 4, No. 4. Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss. 1981. “Credit rationing in markets with incomplete information.” American Economic Review 71:393–409. Stowsky, J. 1996. “Politics and Policy: The Technology Reinvestment Program and the Dilemmas of Dual Use.” Mimeo: University of California. Tassey, Gregory. 1997. The Economics of R&D Policy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Tirman, John. 1984. The Militarization of High Technology. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Tyson, Laura, Tea Petrin, and Halsey Rogers. 1994. "Promoting entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe." Small Business Economics 6:165−184. U.S. Congress, House. 1992. SBIR and Commercialization: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Technology and Competitiveness of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, on the Small Business Innovation Research [SBIR] Program (testimony of James A. Block, President of Creare Inc.), pp. 356−361. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Small Business. 1981. Small Business Research Act of 1981. S.R. 194, 97th Congress. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Small Business. 1981. Senate Report 97–194. Small Business Research Act of 1981. September 25, 1981. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Small Business. 1999. Senate Report 106–330, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program. August 4, 1999. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Congressional Budget Office. 1985. Federal financial support for high-technology industries. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congressional Budget Office. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1987. Federal research: Small Business Innovation Research participants give program high marks. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. 56

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1989. Federal research: Assessment of Small Business Innovation Research program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1997. Federal Research: DoD’s Small Business Innovation Research Program. RCED–97–122, Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1999. Federal Research: Evaluations of Small Business Innovation Research Can Be Strengthened. RCED–99–198, Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. U. S. General Accounting Office. 1998. Federal Research: Observations on the Small Business Innovation Research Program. RCED–98–132. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1992. Small Business Innovation Research Shows Success But Can Be Strengthened. RCED–92–32. Washington, D.C.: U.S General Accounting Office. U.S. Small Business Administration. 1994. Small Business Innovation Development Act: Tenth-year results. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Small Business Administration. 2003. “Small Business by the Numbers.” SBA Office of Advocacy, May. Venture Economics. 1988. Exiting venture capital investments. Wellesley, MA: Venture Economics. Venture Economics. 1996. “Special Report: Rose-colored asset class.” Venture Capital Journal 36 (July) 32–34 (and earlier years). VentureOne. 1997. National Venture Capital Association 1996 annual report. San Francisco: VentureOne. Wallsten, S. J. 2000. The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program, Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1. Wallsten, S. J. 1998, “Rethinking the Small Business Innovation Research Program,” in Branscomb and Keller, Eds., Investing In Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge Wallsten, S. J. 1996. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Encouraging Technological Innovation and Commercialization in Small Firms. (Unpublished working paper, Stanford University). 57

Next: Annex F Research Matrix »
An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $43.00 Buy Ebook | $34.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In response to a Congressional mandate, the National Research Council conducted a review of the SBIR program at the five federal agencies with SBIR programs with budgets in excess of $100 million (DOD, NIH, NASA, DOE, and NSF). The project was designed to answer questions of program operation and effectiveness, including the quality of the research projects being conducted under the SBIR program, the commercialization of the research, and the program's contribution to accomplishing agency missions. This report describes the proposed methodology for the project, identifying how the following tasks will be carried out: 1) collecting and analyzing agency databases and studies; 2) surveying firms and agencies; 3) conducting case studies organized around a common template; and 4) reviewing and analyzing survey and case study results and program accomplishments. Given the heterogeneity of goals and procedures across the five agencies involved, a broad spectrum of evaluative approaches is recommended.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!