Items in cart [4] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Rights & Permissions Free Resources PDF FORMAT Display this book on your site! Related Titles Space Studies Board Annual Report 2004 Space Studies Board Annual Report 2003 Other Related Titles Systems Integration for Project Constellation: Letter Report (2004) Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board (ASEB) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 29   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Attachment C Program Briefings As part of the information-gathering effort for this study, five committee members made presentations to the committee on lessons learned from systems integration of past space and nonspace megaprograms, as follows: aerospace programs from Viking to Space Station, A. Thomas Young Apollo/Bellcom, Robert C. Seamans, Jr. National Reconnaissance Office/COMSAT, Joseph V. Charyk selected megaprojects from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Elvin R. “Vald” Heiberg III selected civilian mega-projects, William C. Breen These programs were selected because they exhibited systems integration characteristics comparable to those of Project Constellation in terms of program scope and complexity. Page 29 Letter Report (1-20) Attachment A: Statement of Task (21-22) Attachment B: Committee Membership Roster and Biographies (23-28) Attachment C: Program Briefings (29-29) Attachment D: Systems Integration Tasks (30-31) Attachment E: Optional Tasks (32-32) Attachment F: Acknowledgment of Reviewers (33-34)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 29
Systems Integration for Project Constellation: Letter Report Attachment C Program Briefings As part of the information-gathering effort for this study, five committee members made presentations to the committee on lessons learned from systems integration of past space and nonspace megaprograms, as follows: aerospace programs from Viking to Space Station, A. Thomas Young Apollo/Bellcom, Robert C. Seamans, Jr. National Reconnaissance Office/COMSAT, Joseph V. Charyk selected megaprojects from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Elvin R. “Vald” Heiberg III selected civilian mega-projects, William C. Breen These programs were selected because they exhibited systems integration characteristics comparable to those of Project Constellation in terms of program scope and complexity.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

program scope