National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 4 Data, Education, and Outreach Initiatives
Suggested Citation:"5 Next Steps." National Research Council. 2004. Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008: Report of the Implementation Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11110.
×

5
NEXT STEPS

This session was moderated by Mr. Phil Smith, the former Executive Officer of the National Research Council (NRC). The discussion noted that although the start of the IPY is still three years away, planning must continue at a quick pace in order for the United States to be fully prepared. Much remains to be done to articulate a clear interagency science plan, create opportunities for scientists to propose concrete activities, develop funding mechanisms, develop international partnerships, and ensure provision of the necessary logistics and infrastructure. The next steps highlighted at the workshop include:

  • Continuing dissemination information about IPY planning to the science community and facilitating their involvement.

  • Developing mechanisms for input: Scientists and science teams are developing, and mechanisms need to be established for interfacing with these groups.

  • Integrating IPY goals with goals of Climate Change Science Program, Group on Earth Observations, etc.

  • Articulating and communicating the overall compelling science issues: This includes short-term and long-term benefits that matter to Congress and the public. To market the IPY, some participants suggested that we need to capitalize on inherent public interest, appeal to the pragmatic side of Congress, and ensure IPY is about good science.

  • Determining how something becomes part of “IPY” and what it means to be an “IPY” activity.

  • Increasing planning discussion for a wide variety of education and outreach activities: One possible idea would be to form a working group to continue the dialog about strategies for education and outreach; the agencies and the PRB should be involved in the continuing discussions.

  • Focusing more attention on data: Some participants suggested formation of a working group that includes members from agencies, data centers, and the science community. Participants noted that early leadership by the United States in

Suggested Citation:"5 Next Steps." National Research Council. 2004. Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008: Report of the Implementation Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11110.
×

data management issues would help guide the eventual ICSU-WMO IPY plans in this area.

  • Developing an IPY timeline: This timeline needs to list IPY tasks, with options for how various responsibilities could be filled.

  • Advancing agency participation and coordination: The workshop is a good start, but continuing efforts are needed; particularly, mechanisms encouraging agencies to begin seeking ways to get IPY-related activities developed (such as interagency agreements, proposal processes, and budget discussions).

  • Determining the future structure of national coordination: Many practical questions about process need to be answered and communicated. One solution discussed is that the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) continue to develop links and coordination mechanisms for agencies to make progress on IPY planning.

  • Determining the future structure of international coordination: International coordination is necessary and all key U.S. parties have to agree on how U.S. interests will be represented in the international realm. The PRB, as the body that represents the U.S. at SCAR and IASC, can continue to play an important role in developing IPY internationally. As the U.S. representative to WMO, NOAA can also provide guidance.

POTENTIAL OUTCOMES OF THE IPY 2007-2008

The final session of the workshop, led by PRB Chair Dr. Robin Bell, discussed some possible outcomes of the IPY. Workshop participants identified outcomes that can be grouped into four categories: intellectual, societal, international, and agency/U.S. government. Results from this discussion are highlighted in Table 2.

At the conclusion of the workshop Dr. Bell thanked all the IPY workshop participants for their participation, saying that the two days had been highly productive because of the superb contributions all had made to the discussions.

TABLE 5.1 Potential Outcomes of the IPY 2007-2008

Intellectual

Creating a polar legacy for the next 50 years

 

New data that is accessible to all interested persons and institutions

 

Advances in scientific understanding

 

Observational infrastructure for ongoing polar research

Understanding teleconnections and roles of polar processes in global climate/weather

Improving understanding of human impacts on polar regions

Advancing technology for polar science

Improving the breadth and number of interdisciplinary studies

Suggested Citation:"5 Next Steps." National Research Council. 2004. Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008: Report of the Implementation Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11110.
×

Societal

Improving data sharing and data management through creation of accessible metadata systems

Inspiring spirit of discovery

Improving understanding of processes of change, how society is influencing change, and how changes will affect society

Improving environmental predictions

Training next generation of engineers, scientists and leaders

Improving the lives of northern residents by advancing studies of human health

Enhancing management and safety of fisheries

Understanding implications of Arctic Basin ice retreat for shipping and economic development

International

Fostering the continued peaceful use of the poles

Advancing international cooperation

Engaging new partners and additional nations to engage in polar science

Leveraging resources to enhance science through international scientific collaborations

Agency/U.S. Government

Enhancing agency synergisms

Improving management of fisheries

Renewing existing infrastructure and developing new infrastructure

Strengthening U.S. position in the Arctic Council and Antarctic Treaty

Suggested Citation:"5 Next Steps." National Research Council. 2004. Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008: Report of the Implementation Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11110.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"5 Next Steps." National Research Council. 2004. Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008: Report of the Implementation Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11110.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"5 Next Steps." National Research Council. 2004. Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008: Report of the Implementation Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11110.
×
Page 37
Next: References »
Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008: Report of the Implementation Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

The International Polar Year (IPY) 2007-2008 will be an internationally coordinated campaign of polar observations, research, and analysis that will further our understanding of physical and social processes in the polar regions, examine their globally-connected role in the climate system, and establish research infrastructure for the future. Within this context, the IPY will galvanize new and innovative observations and research while at the same time building on and enhancing existing relevant initiatives. It also will serve as a mechanism to attract and develop a new generation of scientists and engineers with the versatility to tackle complex global issues. In 2004, the National Academies' Polar Research Board organized a workshop to explore the challenges associated with these initiatives. Planning for the International Polar Year 2007-2008 summarizes the presentations and discussions from this workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!